ourumov said:Look for it in the gas station...Above the 4$ price tag.
Wow .. you're so edgy. So witty.
:rolleyes
ourumov said:Look for it in the gas station...Above the 4$ price tag.
Himuro said:4? It jumped to 2.75 here last night..wtf..
Ark-AMN said:What Darian says... I love my suburbs thank you very much, so fuck off.
jett said:Welcome to the rest of the motherfucking world.
Not that I know a lot about the subject...But main concern of analysts right now is China and the increasing trend of the medium class to buy a car. Nothing new...except for the fact that there are a lot of medium class chinese.SailorDaravon said:I wasn't suggesting that we'd hit peak oil; most people who think we already have probably have no idea what they're talking about. But there's no question that demand is outstripping supply; of COURSE prices are going to go up, and will probably just continue to rise really. I don't think we'll hit the point where people will actually completely stop buying gas for at least 15-20 years (when it's 40 a gallon or god knows what).
chaostrophy said:I'm sure the populations of India and China will gladly fuck off and quit their industrializations so suburbs can remain sustainable longer, as long as you keep speaking up in defense of your lifestyle. Good for you!
You do realize that "Peak Oil" and "Demand Outstriping Supply" have nothing do do with one another, right?SailorDaravon said:I wasn't suggesting that we'd hit peak oil; most people who think we already have probably have no idea what they're talking about. But there's no question that demand is outstripping supply; of COURSE prices are going to go up, and will probably just continue to rise really. I don't think we'll hit the point where people will actually completely stop buying gas for at least 15-20 years (when it's 40 a gallon or god knows what).
Squirrel Killer said:You do realize that "Peak Oil" and "Demand Outstriping Supply" have nothing do do with one another, right?
ourumov said:
Well...You can always ask to one of your comrades...
Anyways if the railway system sucks so much as you say, the administration should do something.
Are you from the U.S.? I'm asking because unlike many parts of Europe, our federal government has very little to do with public transportation. Most are funded from individual cities and state governments.ourumov said:Look for it in the gas station...Above the 4$ price tag.
Anyways it might sound VERY obvious and everything you want...But if I pointed that is because considering the Bush thesis or even the Democrat part I see this pretty unlikely. A lot of people would see a thing like this like an attack to the American Way of Life and probably be against it.
Squirrel Killer said:You do realize that "Peak Oil" and "Demand Outstriping Supply" have nothing do do with one another, right?
xabre said:Why is the subject of peak oil taboo with some people, or even current global oil supply limitations? It isn't too difficult to see where the pressure on oil prices is coming from, that is underlying supply constraints and a speculative market. Total global oil supply most likely has not peaked yet, there is still a very small swing capacity available. Truth be told is that it doesn't matter, light sweet crude (you know the stuff most easily made into gasoline) has peaked and this is not in dispute, the light and sweet stuff is now in decline like it or not, go ask OPEC. Most of the stuff coming out of Saudi Arabia these days is heavier and more sour oils, which are most costly and take longer to refine into gasoline.
So again, its a market driven by supply side limitations and speculation. Other events such as Iraq and the recent hurricane just add fuel to the fire and the overall trend is upward, and nothing short of a recession is going to point a stop to rising oil prices so you all better get used to it and expect much worse to come.
IT HAS BEEN CALCULATED THAT IF EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA DID
NOT PURCHASE A DROP OF GASOLINE FOR ONE DAY AND ALL AT THE SAME TIME, THE
OIL COMPANIES WOULD CHOKE ON THEIR STOCKPILES.
AT THE SAME TIME IT WOULD HIT THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY WITH A NET LOSS OF OVER
4.6 BILLION DOLLARS WHICH AFFECTS THE BOTTOM LINES OF THE OIL COMPANIES.
THEREFORE SEPTEMBER 1st HAS BEEN FORMALLY DECLARED "STICK IT UP THEIR
BEHIND " DAY AND THE PEOPLE OF THESE TWO NATIONS SHOULD NOT BUY A SINGLE
DROP OF GASOLINE THAT DAY.
THE ONLY WAY THIS CAN BE DONE IS IF YOU FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO AS MANY
PEOPLE AS YOU CAN AND AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN TO GET THE WORD OUT.
WAITING ON THE GOVERNMENT TO STEP IN AND CONTROL THE PRICES IS NOT GOING TO
HAPPEN. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE REDUCTION AND CONTROL IN PRICES THAT THE ARAB
NATIONS PROMISED TWO WEEKS AGO?
REMEMBER ONE THING, NOT ONLY IS THE PRICE OF GASOLINE GOING UP BUT AT THE
SAME TIME AIRLINES ARE FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES, TRUCKING COMPANIES ARE
FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES WHICH EFFECTS PRICES ON EVERYTHING THAT IS
SHIPPED. THINGS LIKE FOOD, CLOTHING, BUILDING MATERIALS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES
ETC. WHO PAYS IN THE END? WE DO!
WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE. IF THEY DON'T GET THE MESSAGE AFTER ONE DAY, WE
WILL DO IT
AGAIN AND AGAIN.
SO DO YOUR PART AND SPREAD THE WORD. FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO EVERYONE YOU
KNOW. MARK YOUR CALENDARS AND MAKE SEPTEMBER 1ST A DAY THAT THE CITIZENS OF
THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA SAY "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"
Uh? Most European cities fund their own public transportation too.AirBrian said:Are you from the U.S.? I'm asking because unlike many parts of Europe, our federal government has very little to do with public transportation. Most are funded from individual cities and state governments.
AirBrian said:Are you from the U.S.? I'm asking because unlike many parts of Europe, our federal government has very little to do with public transportation. Most are funded from individual cities and state governments.
fennec fox said:There's also the fact that the current price spike is due to a natural disaster, not Peak Oil. It's off topic.
ourumov said:No I am not from the US and proof of it is I didn't know a fuck about the US railway system. I know that government in the US is pretty different from European countries in the sense that it has little to no relation with a lot of "public stuff". That's why I didn't see so obvious the fact that government should do something to change this.
It's not that they have to build and entire railway network using the contributors money (like it happens here for most of the stuff) but they could encourage companies in some way to improve this.
I *believe* (I use * because it's not I know what the average US citizen thinks about it) that there is a potential market for interurban ways.
The idea of driving a car less scares you? Hell, I'm dancing in the streets... even as it makes me all sweaty.whytemyke said:Like, the effect of this is honestly starting to really scare me in regards to what it'll do to Michigan.
The idea of millions of people in my community losing their jobs because we're driving cars less scares me. Quit thinking of this in such one-dimensional terms, man. It's not just about "driving cars less"... it's about people losing jobs, and that'll fold over into their own local communities having less money, schools having less money, etc etc etc. Despite what environmentalists will say, this is definitely BAD for the American economy, beyond description.fennec fox said:The idea of driving a car less scares you? Hell, I'm dancing in the streets... even as it makes me all sweaty.
Poody said:i hardly ever read chain mail but here's something interesting.
Peak Oil is a theory concerning the long-term rate of fossil fuel extraction and depletion. The Supply-Demand curve is an economic model that describes, explains, and predicts changes in the price and quantity of goods sold in competitive markets.xabre said:What?Squirrel Killer said:You do realize that "Peak Oil" and "Demand Outstriping Supply" have nothing do do with one another, right?
It also assumes that absolutely nothing will replace the current technology of gasoline-fueled cars, which a lot of the not-so-smart Peak Oil posters assume and which there's no evidence for.whytemyke said:The idea of millions of people in my community losing their jobs because we're driving cars less scares me. Quit thinking of this in such one-dimensional terms, man. It's not just about "driving cars less"... it's about people losing jobs, and that'll fold over into their own local communities having less money, schools having less money, etc etc etc. Despite what environmentalists will say, this is definitely BAD for the American economy, beyond description.
It's pretty clear now. I thought people didn't use the rail because driving a car was pretty cheap to them due to cars and gas prices in NA...I didn't know that other options such as the rail were inexistant or pretty bad.Culex said:The biggest problem we in the US have is that there is no commuter railway infrastructure. You basically drive a car, or you're fucking walking. Unless you live in a city, where there's subways, no average American can financially or logistically afford to take a train to work these days.
DarienA said:Short answer because people tend to pull the Peak Oil subject out like it's going to happen tomorrow and society is going to collapse and we'll be living in a Mad Max world next week and there is NOTHING be done at all to address alternate sources of energy(even if those are processes are being stymied by different factors there IS movement there).
Yeah, Michigan's dying. It's already got the highest unemployment in the country and that won't be going down any time soon. People don't understand how immense the automotive industry's influence is on the entire state.whytemyke said:This sucks... seriously, people. Unless you live in Detroit, you can't possibly understand what it's like to watch civillization basically come apart around you. Like, the effect of this is honestly starting to really scare me in regards to what it'll do to Michigan.
I thought many EU governments have more authority over public transportation than the US government does (well, at least for trains)? I thought EU governments require more uniformity and subsidize more as well. My mistake if I'm wrong.Funky Papa said:Uh? Most European cities fund their own public transportation too.
xabre said:That's not a realistic scenario, but peak oil is nevertheless far more credible than you realise. Most would talk about a prolonged recession, gradually deepening over time but we ain't there yet. Where we are, is in a unique position to see a steady and gradual increase in oil prices that show no signs of topping anytime soon. Now oil prices don't just soar from $30 two years ago to the $70 of today without an underlying cause. Speculators aren't going to bid up the price without being confident of a return on their investment.
The fact is global demand is exploding and the supply side of the market is having difficulty keeping up, short of weakening demand this is not going to change . So what are you going to be saying two years from now when oil is over a $100 a barrel and you're paying over $5 at the pump for a gallon? And you will be. I think people need to start getting used to it.
So what are you going to be saying two years from now when oil is over a $100 a barrel and you're paying over $5 at the pump for a gallon? And you will be. I think people need to start getting used to it."
DarienA said:Ok I'm going to need clarification on this... what is the point you're trying to make?
:lol :lol He's got a point there, especially here in east Texas.Downtown generally sucks, and the rest of the city is old shit buildings.
chaostrophy said:My point was that those of us on this board who criticize suburbia, and other Americans like us, are not going to be what ends suburbia, whenever it ends up going away. Americans in general like suburbia and cheap gas too much for the government to increase gas taxes or pass any of the other policies that us environmentalists/new urbanists/whatever would like to see. It's increased demand for oil from China, India, and other countries that are currently going through mass industrialization that's going to drive the price of oil up to the point where a suburban lifestyle is too expensive for the masses. And when it happens, we aren't to blame.
Certain trains are funded by the government, but subways, buses and streetcars are paid by the cities.Some of them, specially buses, are contracted with private companies. That means higher taxes, of course.AirBrian said:I thought many EU governments have more authority over public transportation than the US government does (well, at least for trains)? I thought EU governments require more uniformity and subsidize more as well. My mistake if I'm wrong.
EDIT: What are UK's PTAs considered then?
xabre said:. Speculators aren't going to bid up the price without being confident of a return on their investment.
.