Finished:
The Pale King by David Foster Wallace
Occasionally beautiful, occasionally frustrating. Reading the notes from Wallace at the end made me sad. The book was going to be sooooo much more than what it is now. But there's still a fair amount of insight and good prose in what's available. It's worth reading for the big ideas and a few absolutely gorgeous chapters, but don't expect anything more than faint whispers of plot. My favorite bits included.Toni Ware's trailer park upbringing, the "death of civics" conversation, and the psych ward story
Almost forgot that Dust came out - is it worth reading? I finished Shift recently but didn't enjoy it nearly as much as I did Wool.
So since I'm running out of books to read, I'll be ordering a new 3-book batch soon. Right now I have in my cart:
Red Seas Under Red Skies
Neuromancer
And the third book is a tossup between The Shining Girls and Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore.
Any of you read either of those two and willing to help me decide on which one to read? I've read good and bad things about both books, but I like both their descriptions. I guess whichever I don't order will get bumped a little further down the wishlist, but I'll end up reading both eventually.
I rented Murakami's The Wind-up Bird Chronicles from my library. But after hearing about it being abridged and losing about 10-15 percent of its story, is this story still worth reading? I love Kafka on the Shore, and I really liked what I read of Sputnik's Love, before I had to turn it back in to the library.
Anyone know a good eBook on understanding serial killers?
Also, how is Ready Player One? I am somewhat interested in reading it because some of the characters being Hikikomori.
Also, how is Ready Player One? I am somewhat interested in reading it because some of the characters being Hikikomori.
Also, how is Ready Player One? I am somewhat interested in reading it because some of the characters being Hikikomori.
I can't compare it to the Japanese original, but I really loved Wind-up Bird Chronicle. It did not feel incomplete or abridged in any way. In fact, the story feels fairly loose with lots of wonderful meandering into all sorts of nooks and crannies that aren't really nessecary.
I would count it as one of the best books I've read recently, and I thought it was much better than Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World, which I read shortly afterwards.
It seems pretty much a love it/hate it book. I thought it was great fun, and a bit ridiculous at times, but the book clearly knows it and states that very fact at times. Gaming/Anime/80s references a plenty, so I had a blast reading it really.
I liked it as well. Thought it was a fun read.
It's an amateurish novel that gets by thanks to an interesting premise and appeal to nostalgia/pop cultural references.
anyone pick up Night Film yet?
Dat dere gubments hushed it up.I'm listening to Dan Brown's latest, Inferno because I find them generally mindlessly entertaining and it's a good kind of inconsequential book after reading a number of meatier tomes but I'm baffled. So, the protagonist Robert Langdon has saved the world from an evil pope, somehow did something about Jesus in DaVinci Code which also saved the world though I can't for the life of me remember how and also stopped some lunatic tattooed dude from I guess destroying the world yet, in his latest adventure, NONE OF THOSE PREVIOUS ESCAPADES IS EVER MENTIONED.
When describing Langdon he is still just a professor of symbology and art history. Not three time World Champion of Saving the World from history-obsessed lunatics.
What the fuck?
Dat dere gubments hushed it up.
He's the Indiana Jones of Christendom... Or perhaps Christendumb.Has the government ever played a role in any of these books? Your comment about this abysmal fiction is ignorant! (I wish I were still so ignorant).
But seriously, it's written mostly from Langdon's point of view. He participated in those events yet he never ponders them and is constantly wondering "how did I get into this mess?!" Not ever the more logical "how do I get into these messes?"
At least John McClane is fucking self-aware enough to know that it's ludicrous for one cop to get in so many damn predicaments!
anyone pick up Night Film yet?
It's on my bed at my place in LA.
I'm about halfway through it. It's really good.
Anybody reading the kindle version of Night Film?
Anybody reading the kindle version of Night Film?
MMA-GAF book club pick of the month?
I'm reading a Kobo version, which I'm guessing is pretty much the same thing. Did you want me to check something?
God dammit, all those buzz words appeal to me I'm sure I'll crack and read it after I'm done with Art of Fielding.Let's do it.
It's really very good. The construction of the narrative evokes the feeling of playing an old Sierra adventure game. The Gabriel Knightesque story helps create that aesthetic too.
I'm reading a Kobo version, which I'm guessing is pretty much the same thing. Did you want me to check something?
Let's do it.
It's really very good. The construction of the narrative evokes the feeling of playing an old Sierra adventure game. The Gabriel Knightesque story helps create that aesthetic too.
Legit question drm. I love my Kobo, but hate the kobo store with a passion, so I just buy from Amazon, and use Calibre to get my books onto my Kobo. Are you unaware of such capabilities? Because it's nice to be able to partake in the mystery of wondering what the Kindle dailies will be. It's a bit of extra work, but the Amazon prices sure beat the nonsense Kobo has.
I thought the book included some images. I was just wondering if you had any trouble viewing them on an e-reader.
Reading Romance of Three Kingdoms against my better judgement. I can't keep track of all threes names man.
Indiana Jones never pretends that there is no reason for him to be doing the things he is doing. There is limited call back in those stories in part to convey that this is just kind of what he does. In Inferno, it's like this is a wholly different parallel universe where none of the other events ever took place. It's especially bizarre because in the other books he DOES touch on past escapades.
Old prose is funny. It's a lot of pontificating and people being slain with no actual descriptions of the killing. A lot of "and then this happened and then THIS happened".