No pictures or diagrams for Delusions of Gender so the ebook version should be perfectly fine.
Eh. The ebook version isn't even a significant savings compared to the paperback.
No pictures or diagrams for Delusions of Gender so the ebook version should be perfectly fine.
Yup, apparently it's chronological now.
Weird that they're messing with the order now, some 63 years after the first book was published.
Weird that they're messing with the order now, some 63 years after the first book was published.
I thought they changed the order ages ago?
Finished Hunger Games, moving on to Catching Fire!
Just finishing up
I really enjoyed that series, although the first book was a fair bit better than the others.
I recently completed A Dance with Dragons by George R. R. Martin.The quality of the writing is definitely better than that of book 4, and some of the less interesting characters (Sansa and Samwell in particular) are thankfully absent. Tyrion's chapters are a disappointment, with him pretty much out of the game for the entire book; the loveable little prick does return to form in his final chapter, however. Daenerys and company remain dreadfully boring. The most interesting theme of the book is reversal of fortune (usually good to bad) and how a character deals with the change -- some never learn (Cersei), some strive to do better (Jaime), some are broken (Theon). Still it feels as if 90% of this book is simply build up to the payoff in the last 100 pages.
ADWD was the biggest disappointment for me due to the POV's involved... I'm one of the rare people who preferred AFFC to ADWD
Finished:
The Shining Girls by Lauren Beukes
Meh, it was disappointing. A time traveling serial killer sounds like a good premise for a book, but the time traveling thing was just a gimmick and not really fleshed out. The killer didn't have a satisfying motivation. The ending was pretty weak. And the time traveling didn't make sense.
Emperor of thorns by Mark Lawrence
Some people are crazy and like their ebooks. :OEh. The ebook version isn't even a significant savings compared to the paperback.
now on to this:
What did you think of Wool? It was a fun series but I just never felt quite satisfied...
why would you read a book with no words
Some people are crazy and like their ebooks. :O
Actually I'm the crazy one who can never convince myself to get the ebook version because I like the feel of paper too much.
E-books obviously have certain advantages (like the fact that you can carry lots of them around with you), but for many book buyers their main appeal is that theyre cheaper. Against that, the Codex Group finds that people of all ages still prefer print for serious reading; e-book sales are dominated by genre fictionlight reading. This may be just a prejudice that will vanish as e-books become more common. But we do read things differently when theyre on a page rather than on a screen. A study this year found that people reading on a screen tended to skip around more and read less intensively, and plenty of research confirms that people tend to comprehend less of what they read on a screen. The differences are small, but they may explain the persistent appeal of paper. Indeed, hardcover sales rose last year by a hundred million dollars.
For many people, as a number of studies show, reading is a genuinely tactile experiencehow a book feels and looks has a material impact on how we feel about reading. This isnt necessarily Luddism or nostalgia. The truth is that the book is an exceptionally good piece of technologyeasy to read, portable, durable, and inexpensive. Unlike the phase-change move toward digital that we saw in music, the transition to e-books is going to be slow; coexistence is more likely than conquest. The book isnt obsolete. Barnes & Noble just needs to make sure it isnt, either.
This is how reading is for me - I retain information better and concentrate better when I'm reading paper (and I find this is also true for when I've read things printed out, not just books) - and a good part of my enjoyment comes from the look, feel, and smell of a book.
As much as I like the feel of a physical book (especially a nice thick paperback), I really, really love getting instant dictionary lookups on a kindle. Being able to just touch an unfamiliar word and get a definition is invaluable when reading, especially with older or more challenging books. Since I got a kindle in 2010, the only physical books I've bought (outside of schoolwork) have been Mark Z. Danielewski's stuff, for obvious reasons. Which I guess are pretty much the pinnacle of creating atmosphere via a book's physicality.
It happened in 1994! I do like how there's an argument for both sides though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chronicles_of_Narnia#Reading_order
That's pretty cool. I've only ever read them in chronological order, as the box set I have presented them in that way. I wonder how differently I would feel had I read them in the original sequence.
I am kind of curious how these people supposedly "skip around" on an e-reader. For me, one of the biggest weaknesses of a Kindle is the amount of effort you need to expend in order to "skip around". With a paper book, i can riffle through the pages to get to any chapter i want, use a finger or a bookmark to note down the page, and then do it again. This is invaluable for studying from a textbook when you need to reference and cross-reference and cross-cross-reference.
Doing that on a KIndle would just be a nightmare.
Thanks.No pictures or diagrams for Delusions of Gender so the ebook version should be perfectly fine.
Yeah, the dictionary lookup is the best feature that makes stick with ebooks for now. Plus Kobo/Kindles are very lightweight and certainly beat carrying around a 1k pages book. Honestly at this point the only time I go with a physical copy is if the preferred translated version isn't available or I just happen to grab the book at the library.As much as I like the feel of a physical book (especially a nice thick paperback), I really, really love getting instant dictionary lookups on a kindle. Being able to just touch an unfamiliar word and get a definition is invaluable when reading, especially with older or more challenging books. Since I got a kindle in 2010, the only physical books I've bought (outside of schoolwork) have been Mark Z. Danielewski's stuff, for obvious reasons. Which I guess are pretty much the pinnacle of creating atmosphere via a book's physicality.
I am kind of curious how these people supposedly "skip around" on an e-reader. For me, one of the biggest weaknesses of a Kindle is the amount of effort you need to expend in order to "skip around". With a paper book, i can riffle through the pages to get to any chapter i want, use a finger or a bookmark to note down the page, and then do it again. This is invaluable for studying from a textbook when you need to reference and cross-reference and cross-cross-reference.
Doing that on a KIndle would just be a nightmare.
Always wondered what I would do if I had to flip back to a certain event while reading on a Kobo. I probably would just ignore it and do nothing.
With Kobo you can use the highlight feature. Just highlight a section and it'll be listed for whenever you want to go back to it. I use it from time to time if there's a quote I want to remember.
Ah but here's the rub, you might not know that you want to refer to something until you've read past it. I can personally attest to this while I was reading Book of the New Sun. There were many places where I wanted to go back real quick to double check on something but that was rendered, more or less, impossible by the nature of e-readers.
After really enjoying the first half of "The Walk", I'm struggling a little with the second half. Where the first half was the character building and story moving on, the second half is just place and action descriptions. Constantly.
I hated this about the Dragon Tattoo book, where every single action was described, mentioning the contents of a bin for example. Some description is good to set the scene but too much just feels like filler ... and that's what this is starting to feel like.
It's only a short book so I'll finish this part but not sure I'll carry on with the series.
Finished:
The Shining Girls by Lauren Beukes
Meh, it was disappointing. A time traveling serial killer sounds like a good premise for a book, but the time traveling thing was just a gimmick and not really fleshed out. The killer didn't have a satisfying motivation. The ending was pretty weak. And the time traveling didn't make sense.
I read it when it first came out and that's exactly what I thought, which is unfortunate since her previous book was so good.
Ultimately the book felt empty because there was no reason or rhyme to both the killings and the time travelling and the serial killer himself remained a mystery despite far too many chapters devoted to him. The book didn't really work in the end. It would have been a great novella but its a shallow 300 page novel.
Ah but here's the rub, you might not know that you want to refer to something until you've read past it. I can personally attest to this while I was reading Book of the New Sun. There were many places where I wanted to go back real quick to double check on something but that was rendered, more or less, impossible by the nature of e-readers.
Ah but here's the rub, you might not know that you want to refer to something until you've read past it. I can personally attest to this while I was reading Book of the New Sun. There were many places where I wanted to go back real quick to double check on something but that was rendered, more or less, impossible by the nature of e-readers.
Finished:
As someone who worships at the alter of Vonnegut, my opinion when it comes to this book may be a bit biased, but I feel these short stories are every bit as important as Vonnegut's novels when it comes to his contribution to literature. I'm repeating myself in this thread but his ability to capture pieces of the human experience in such simple, heartfelt prose is remarkable. Even the lesser known stories like "D.P." and "The Euphio Question" are incredibly impactful. I'd highly recommend it to someone who is just starting, or wants to start reading Vonnegut.
.