hunger games seems to be some hot business right now. aren't they YA novels?
hunger games seems to be some hot business right now. aren't they YA novels?
The Hunger Games is engaging and a page-turner, but it's painfully mediocre IMO.
Allow me to clarify.A novel has to hit 'engaging' and 'page-turner' just to be considered mediocre now? Those two buzz words alone would suggest that the novel's at least above average.
The Hunger Games is engaging and a page-turner, but it's painfully mediocre IMO.
Still loving 11/22/63, I'm about a third of the way through now.
I guess all this Hunger Games backlash is due to the coming movie or whatever? Don't really get it; I thought the book was wonderful.
The incongruity of these two statements hurts my head.
This.I agree with it, though it is kind of difficult to explain. There are some interesting concepts in the story/world that I wanted to see play out, and the writing is very simple, so it goes by very quick. However, the actual story and characters is really uninteresting, and, I thought, just got worse as the story went on.
No, I agree. I felt the latter two weren't nearly as strong as the first. I'm just taken aback that people are so critical of the first one.
Yes and it's painfully obvious. The concept for the world is actually really interesting, but the lead character keeps getting in the way by being all wrapped up in being a huge cock tease in this dumbass love triangle. She also handles murdering random strangers surprisingly well as long as she's never spoken to them much before. I've read the first two books now though so might as well finish. Think I'll try Battle Royale after.
Battle Royale manga is fantastic, way better than the movie.
Finished Mortal Engines and can't find the second book in ebook form, so I'm debating what to read now.
Considering:
- Dragonriders of Pern (have had on backlog for 20 years, no joke)
- Mr. Fox
- A Monster Calls
- another Larry McMurtry novel
- Miss Peregrine's Home...
- the one that most would suggest I read: the Border Trilogy
Still loving 11/22/63, I'm about a third of the way through now.
I'm 2/3 through The Hunger Games (first book) and story-wise it's cliche after cliche, writing is so poor like I'm reading bad movie script. I've decided to finish at least the first book but...does it get better later on?
I suggest A Monster Calls. It's a pretty quick read, but made me all emotional.
I guess all this Hunger Games backlash is due to the coming movie or whatever? Don't really get it; I thought the book was wonderful.
Finished Mortal Engines and can't find the second book in ebook form, so I'm debating what to read now.
Considering:
- Dragonriders of Pern (have had on backlog for 20 years, no joke)
- Mr. Fox
- A Monster Calls
- another Larry McMurtry novel
- Miss Peregrine's Home...
- the one that most would suggest I read: the Border Trilogy
I'm about 2/3s through, and to say that I'm ready for it to end would be a big understatement. I've about had all of 'small town American charm as reported by Stephen King' that I can stand. HALF this novel could have been cut without any damage to the story.
I took a many year break from King and then read Bag of Bones on a lark and haven't touched him since. I should have learned my lesson with that bloated bit of sap...
Battle Royale manga is fantastic, way better than the movie.
Just started up ...
Beyond the Blue Event Horizon by Frederik Pohl
I'm already a bit disappointed thatit's not continuing Robinette's story. But I'm sure I'll probably like it just the same. It's already interesting that they've found a fully loaded Heechee food mining facility.
Finished over the weekend:
Moved straight on to:
A lot of people have told me I'm at the point where this series gets boring, but if anything I'm enjoying it more now than I did the first couple of books. Something just clicked about two thirds of the way through book 4 and I am just devouring book 5
I was too impatient. This book/series is awesome! Ordering book 3 now.
The writing is fine in The Hunger Games. It's simple and easy to read with good pacing, thats why I pretty much read the book in one go.
Right, I imagine what people mean by "not good" is "not beautiful" or "not complicated". There's a time in place for all styles, and I think Collins chooses one that's appropriate for the tone and story she wants to tell. Of course that doesn't mean everyone has to like it, but I think it's good and appropriate.
Can't go wrong with Mr. Fox or the Border Trilogy. At least, the first two books of the Border Trilogy.
I actually thought the 2nd book was much more clever, mainly because the author kinda HAD to explain everything and he did a very good job of it. It was intricate, complex, emotional and thoughtful. A very good climax to a strange and wonderful story.I loved Hyperion, but felt like Fall was a huge letdown. The first was so clever in its structure and story, but the second felt so much more mundane. Maybe I read them too close together, but I still haven't gotten around to the next in the series.
When I first read these, I wasn't a big reader. And I enjoyed them. But looking back now, I realize how boring and slow the first book was, and how contrived and annoying the 2nd was. Afterwards, I read Carl Sagan's Pale Blue Dot and completely forgot about Larsson's series. For the better, in retrospect. Very mediocre overall and undeserving of all the hype.Finished all the Stieg Larsson books.
Girl With the Dragon Tattoo - The best.
Girl Who Played With Fire - Decent, but goes a bit too outlandish.
Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest - Terrible and tedious.
When the mystery in the books is on going they can be pretty enjoyable. When the mysteries are not on going they can be pretty bad. I genuinely have no idea why these are so popular especially since I found the third book to be one of the most dull and tedious things I have ever read.
Also trying to track down some Ezra Pound poetry collections.
And the novel's better than the Manga!
That's the impression I get from those comments, too.
You may not like it, but there's nothing "bad" about Collins' writing. It's simple and perfectly-paced.
http://i.imgur.com/X8B9n.png
http://i.imgur.com/X8B9n.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
Now that's [i]something[/i]. I wonder if the guy is crazy or just the master of sarcasm.
http://i.imgur.com/X8B9n.png
Just reposting this from the 50 movies/books thread. I'm interested in hearing what some other people have to think about it.
Book 1: Breakfast of Champions by Vonnegut
The book was interesting though I sort of lost the focus of it midway through. I know Vonnegut states in the book that he isn't interested in making a statement but the book certainly feels like he's making one. I just couldn't figure out what it was.
One of the more noticeable things (partly due to the year it was published) was the flagrant use of the n-word in a way that seemed both intentional and colloquial. Kind of a "we call them N-words because they are N-words and that isn't necessarily a bad thing" yet the way it was done seemed to call such use into question without ever doing so. I don't know if I'm reading into what I shouldn't or if that was intended.
I did just absolutely plow through this book so I didn't give it the same attention I give the books I analyze for my classes... I won't be surprised if I missed something obvious.
Now reading:
It's about time I started with this series, I bought the books almost 19 years ago.
Just reposting this from the 50 movies/books thread. I'm interested in hearing what some other people have to think about it.
Book 1: Breakfast of Champions by Vonnegut
The book was interesting though I sort of lost the focus of it midway through. I know Vonnegut states in the book that he isn't interested in making a statement but the book certainly feels like he's making one. I just couldn't figure out what it was.
One of the more noticeable things (partly due to the year it was published) was the flagrant use of the n-word in a way that seemed both intentional and colloquial. Kind of a "we call them N-words because they are N-words and that isn't necessarily a bad thing" yet the way it was done seemed to call such use into question without ever doing so. I don't know if I'm reading into what I shouldn't or if that was intended.
I did just absolutely plow through this book so I didn't give it the same attention I give the books I analyze for my classes... I won't be surprised if I missed something obvious.