Poltergust
Member
We all know that there's more to Election Day than the presidential vote. In addition to voting people into federal, state, and local position, each state has their own very important ballot measures for the electorate to also decide on. So, describe what measures your state has and how and why you're voting Yes or No for them.
Here in Florida, we have 4 proposed Amendments that will be voted on on Election Day.
Amendment 1:
I'm voting NO for this. This may all seem well and good at first glance, but it is in fact a trick to get people to allow legislators to impose fees on people who have their own solar equipment, completely eliminating net metering and defeating the point of owning solar equipment in the first place. This amendment actually does not grant any extra rights to individual citizens, which is what makes it so devious.
This will allow energy companies to essentially have complete control over solar power because they don't want private citizens to produce their own electricity. This absolutely cannot happen. If you live in Florida, please spread the word on this deception and explain what this amendment will actually do.
Moving on...
Amendment 2:
Voting YES on this for extremely evident reasons. It's infuriating that this amendment did not pass in 2014 despite obtaining a majority of YESes, because under Florida law any ballot measure needs to obtain >60% of the total vote in order to pass.
Amendment 3:
Voting YES because I have empathy.
Amendment 5:
Voting YES because why not.
Yeah, the biggest issue in my state is definitely going to be Amendment 1. I can't imagine most people voting YES for it once they know what the purpose of it is.
Here in Florida, we have 4 proposed Amendments that will be voted on on Election Day.
Amendment 1:
Rights of Electricity Consumers Regarding Solar Energy Choice said:This amendment establishes a right under Florida's constitution for consumers to own or lease solar equipment installed on their property to generate electricity for their own use. State and local governments shall retain their abilities to protect consumer rights and public health, safety and welfare, and to ensure that consumers who do not choose to install solar are not required to subsidize the costs of backup power and electric grid access to those who do.
I'm voting NO for this. This may all seem well and good at first glance, but it is in fact a trick to get people to allow legislators to impose fees on people who have their own solar equipment, completely eliminating net metering and defeating the point of owning solar equipment in the first place. This amendment actually does not grant any extra rights to individual citizens, which is what makes it so devious.
This will allow energy companies to essentially have complete control over solar power because they don't want private citizens to produce their own electricity. This absolutely cannot happen. If you live in Florida, please spread the word on this deception and explain what this amendment will actually do.
Moving on...
Amendment 2:
Use of Marijuana for Debilitating Medical Conditions said:Allows medical use of marijuana for individuals with debilitating medical conditions as determined by a licensed Florida physician. Allows caregivers to assist patients medical use of marijuana. The Department of Health shall register and regulate centers that produce and distribute marijuana for medical purposes and shall issue identification cards to patients and caregivers. Applies only to Florida law. Does not immunize violations of federal law or any non-medical use, possession or production of marijuana.
Voting YES on this for extremely evident reasons. It's infuriating that this amendment did not pass in 2014 despite obtaining a majority of YESes, because under Florida law any ballot measure needs to obtain >60% of the total vote in order to pass.
Amendment 3:
TAX EXEMPTION FOR TOTALLY AND PERMANENTLY DISABLED FIRST RESPONDERS. said:Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to authorize a first responder, who is totally and permanently disabled as a result of injuries sustained in the line of duty, to receive relief from ad valorem taxes assessed on homestead property, if authorized by general law. If approved by voters, the amendment takes effect January 1, 2017.
Voting YES because I have empathy.
Amendment 5:
Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to revise the homestead tax exemption that may be granted by counties or municipalities for property with just value less than $250,000 owned by certain senior, low-income, long-term residents to specify that just value is determined in the first tax year the owner applies and is eligible for the exemption. The amendment takes effect January 1, 2017, and applies retroactively to exemptions granted before January 1, 2017.
Voting YES because why not.
Yeah, the biggest issue in my state is definitely going to be Amendment 1. I can't imagine most people voting YES for it once they know what the purpose of it is.