I've been reading about her in Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. This woman is so full of it, and not to mention takes things way out of context to the point where you wonder if she has some serious issues. I think she does.
Example - This was taken from a New York Times article...
...and she somehow came up with this:
She put that in her book, Slander.
This woman should not be allowed to publish anything. I'm sorry. Hell, she shouldn't be allowed to write after I saw something she so proudly claims in her new book:
...might as well consider her a Neo-Fascist.
You want to talk about a threat to our national security? How do you think a member of Al Queda would feel after reading that? You know, if she made a valid point I would defend her even if it did make us look bad. But it's not a valid point. It's bitter, vile, disgusting hatred coming from the mind of a brainwashed fundamentalist.
"How to talk to a liberal (if you must)." Give me a break. For one, Ann, you need to have your facts straight if you want to talk to a liberal (what about moderates? Oh I'm sorry, all moderates must be liberals today). That MIGHT be boring to you, but that's the way the world works (unless you're Ann Coulter, then you can make stuff up and/or seriously modify existing information for a better read, even if that makes it 100% inaccurate!)
Her books are bestsellers. I can't fathom why people would even want to believe half the things she is talking about. People like Al Franken are considered liars, yet Ann Coulter is "fair and balanced." That's messed up. You know, most of the reason why fundamentalist loons don't listen to liberals and believe conservatives is probably because conservative pay more attention to issues like religion in school, censorship, banning abortion etc. -- all the things that are important to parents. That's fine. But it's sad that just because liberals AREN'T as supportive of these things, that instantly makes them immoral in everything they do and thus they have no credibility for anything they say.
Also, Al Franken's book, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" is a great read, pick it up if you haven't already...
Example - This was taken from a New York Times article...
Think about it. If everyone flew naked, not only would you never have to worry about the passenger next to you carring box cutters or exploding shoes, but no religious fundamentalists of any stripe would ever be caught dead flying nude...
...and she somehow came up with this:
New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman sniffed that racial profiling was not "civilized." He blamed twenty years of relentless attacks by Muslim extremists on -- I quote -- "religious fundamentalists of any stripe."
She put that in her book, Slander.
This woman should not be allowed to publish anything. I'm sorry. Hell, she shouldn't be allowed to write after I saw something she so proudly claims in her new book:
Her 9/11 comments: "I am often asked if I still think we should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity. The answer is: Now more than ever!"
...might as well consider her a Neo-Fascist.
You want to talk about a threat to our national security? How do you think a member of Al Queda would feel after reading that? You know, if she made a valid point I would defend her even if it did make us look bad. But it's not a valid point. It's bitter, vile, disgusting hatred coming from the mind of a brainwashed fundamentalist.
"How to talk to a liberal (if you must)." Give me a break. For one, Ann, you need to have your facts straight if you want to talk to a liberal (what about moderates? Oh I'm sorry, all moderates must be liberals today). That MIGHT be boring to you, but that's the way the world works (unless you're Ann Coulter, then you can make stuff up and/or seriously modify existing information for a better read, even if that makes it 100% inaccurate!)
Her books are bestsellers. I can't fathom why people would even want to believe half the things she is talking about. People like Al Franken are considered liars, yet Ann Coulter is "fair and balanced." That's messed up. You know, most of the reason why fundamentalist loons don't listen to liberals and believe conservatives is probably because conservative pay more attention to issues like religion in school, censorship, banning abortion etc. -- all the things that are important to parents. That's fine. But it's sad that just because liberals AREN'T as supportive of these things, that instantly makes them immoral in everything they do and thus they have no credibility for anything they say.
Also, Al Franken's book, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" is a great read, pick it up if you haven't already...