Support NeoGAF

[BossLackey]

For me, it's 10-20 hours. Feels like the sweet spot.

A full story can be told, you can fully explore the mechanics of a game, but it doesn't overstay it's welcome.

I'm slowly backing away from longer games because I just do not have the attention span to dedicate 40, 80, or god-forbid 100+ hours to ONE video game.

 

[TintoConCasera]

Depends on the type of game. I don't mind spending hundreds of hours in a game like Elden Ring or RimWorld.

 

[Mortisfacio]

10-20 hours for me. I like the idea of 40+ hours, but there needs to be a lot of care to gameplay, writing and world building. Majority of 40+ hour games are only 40+ hours because they're littered with a bunch of slop to make them this long. I don't need or want that.

 

[jshackles]

Voted 20-40 hours since that's a good average. Some longer JRPGs I love so much that even after 100 hours, I don't want them to end. Similarly, some games can start to feel like a chore before even the 10 hour mark.

 

[DKehoe]

As long as it continues to feel fresh.

 

[cireza]

More than 40 hours is very risky. Probably reaching that playtime for bad reasons.

 

[Artistic]

Depends the genre.

For me, I expect 40 hours minimum for a RPG. Anything outside of that, I'm OK with 10-20 hours.

 

[MrAlwaysRight]

10-20 hours for sure, if i get to around 8 hours and i check online how many more missions or levels or whatever structure it has and i'm not halfway through i'm already pulling the plug, nobody's got time for that.

 

[Danjin44]

I don't care if the games 10 hours long or 100 hours as long as it's satisfying.

 

[BossLackey]

10-20 hours for sure, if i get to around 8 hours and i check online how many more missions or levels or whatever structure it has and i'm not halfway through i'm already pulling the plug, nobody's got time for that.

This is EXACTLY me.

Who the fuck has time for games that are dozens and dozens of hours long!?

Like, truly, I do not understand.

If you're a kid with no money and a ton of free time, Persona 5 Royal sounds great.

Outside of that, I don't get it (and I've tried many times to)

 

[pudel]

I really like long games. (if not made artificially long with fetch and nonsense stuff). Games under 10hrs I usually dont even consider buying/installing.

 

[ReyBrujo]

10-20 personally for the vast majority of games. However for dungeon crawlers I don't mind if they reach hundreds because I start those games with a "this is going to be a constant grind, repetitive enemies, advancing a little and backtracking a lot, one bad step and whole party is wiped and have to start from scratch" mentality. For other games I start them thinking they are "unique", unique environments, skills, enemies, plot, etc, and when they start repeating stuff it makes me really tired mentally. Take Devil May Cry, it's a "6 hours" game according to HLTB, just 22 or 23 stages, but they had like 4 bosses and they came again and again, 3 times each, so I grow tired, it's not a surprise or a shock but utter boredom.

Oh, and HLTB statistics, don't even get me started with them, statistics are so fucked up, since only hardcore people use it it says a game lasts 10 hours and completionist (I guess with a guide) takes 20 hours, but it takes me 20 just to finish the game. So I take completionist as my target time to finish the game. And others report the "in-game time clock". Sure, I finish the game in 5 hours and 45 minutes according to the in-game clock, but it doesn't account all the times I had to reset to load a file so in the end I spent 12 or so hours, over twice.

I try not to spoil myself looking at how many stages there are available, I like that being a surprise. However some games I felt they could have been better with less stages.

 

[BossLackey]

I really like long games. (if not made artificially long with fetch and nonsense stuff). Games under 10hrs I usually dont even consider buying/installing.

To me, these shorter games feel more "concentrated".

Long games (outside of a few exceptions like Elden Ring) feel like they're taking 20 hours of content and spreading it over 80 hours of game.

I'd rather have a bowl of flavorful soup than a bucket of broth water.

 

[AJUMP23]

10 to 20 is pretty good. I have 75 hours in Silksong, but if there was a no damage mode I would turn that on.

 

[MagiusNecros]

Where is the 200+ hours option?

 

[ssringo]

Main 10 to 20
Extra is another 10 to 20

 

[BossLackey]

Where is the 200+ hours option?

 

[Magic Carpet]

Where is the 200+ hours option?

That's World of Warcraft territory, No longer in the realm of 'ideal'.

 

[saintjules]

I am semi-retiring games now for the last few years because they're so long to get through. But I keep buying them anyway.

Anyway, a 10-20 hour experience would be nice. For JRPGs, I think 30-40 is plentiful provided they keep me engaged and not full of samey sidequests.

 

[HercRaato]

Depends on the game. RPGs 50-120ish hours. Other genres 10- 20 hours Usually is good. Just give me a good game (mechanics) or a good story.

 

[Humdinger]

10-20 hours is the sweet spot for me. I will make exceptions for longer games that really suck me in, but that hasn't happened in many years.

I still enjoy some games that run 30-40 hours, but I typically will ignore most side activities to keep the experience relatively tight. I still find myself impatient with long cutscenes, though, which games in this range often have.

 

[MagiusNecros]

That's World of Warcraft territory, No longer in the realm of 'ideal'.

Nah that is Monster Hunter, PSO, Musou and Xenoblade X territory.

I didn't say 1000+ hours lol

 

[semiconscious]

there's no such thing. i love elden ring & resident evil biohazard equally...

 

[ChorizoPicozo]

30 hrs is the sweet G spot (G = Gamer) after that, the game has to have the mechanical/systems to mess around to find the "META".

 

[Poppinfresh]

RPGs/JRPGs: 60 - 100 hours is the sweet spot.

Everything else: 20 - 60, depending on the game.

Less than 20, and I really don't feel like I'm getting my money's worth these days.

 

[PauloRoberto]

There is no sweetspot... there is the sensation a game is NOT making you do repeated tasks or showed repated contents/quests for the sake of pretending it's longer than it should have been. It that regards, i believe Astrobot and Elden Ring are very good examples of that. Totally different durations, but when the game starts to feel stale, it's in the ending/near the ending.

 

[Mr Hyde]

10-20 hours is my sweet spot nowadays. It's the perfect length. But as I prefer RPGs, I often tend to play games that are around 20-40 hours long. It can be cumbersome sometimes but I usually manage since it's a genre I love. If it's over 50 hours I tend to zone out and drop it. 100 hours are very rare. It needs to be GOAT quality like Elden Ring, The Witcher 3 or Tears of the Kingdom if I'm gonna play long games like that. Otherwise it's a big nope.

 

[pudel]

To me, these shorter games feel more "concentrated".

Long games (outside of a few exceptions like Elden Ring) feel like they're taking 20 hours of content and spreading it over 80 hours of game.

I'd rather have a bowl of flavorful soup than a bucket of broth water.

Nah, there are also "good long games". And I play also lots of simulation type games as well (Satisfactory, Dyson Sphere Program, Kerbal Space Program, X4, Planet Coaster...such stuff) where you can get lost yrself for hundreds of hours.

 

[TintoConCasera]

That's World of Warcraft territory, No longer in the realm of 'ideal'.

I have more than 200 hours on a bunch of games and they are all single-player.

Some games are just too good.

 

[R6Rider]

I typically prefer if games are between 15-20 hours long.

Granted, different genres cater to longer play times like RPGs.

 

[DreamcastSkies]

Depends on the genre

 

[S0ULZB0URNE]

If they want $60+ from me I need either a super lengthy game or a multiplayer mode/s.

 

[The_hunter]

Bring back the 20 hour single player game.

 

[RoboFu]

As long as it needs to be but not longer.

MGS1 is a perfect example of that.

 

[Angry_Megalodon]

I don't have a preference. If they give me quality and no filler, I will be glad there's lot of it.

Silksong and E33 has lots of top quality content. On the other side of the spectrum you have Ubisoft. I'd pay the same price for a refined AC experience instead of a 100-hour slop.

 

[Skitso]

Something like Cyberpunk or Witcher, I would wish it never ends, but other than those types of games, somewhere around 20h.

 

[Bondo]

10-20hrs is good enough for me.
Recently Mafia Old Country and MGS3 Delta hit that wonderful sweetspot. At my max 60hr is pushing it.

 

[Holammer]

somewhere between 2 to 400 hours.

 

[xrnzaaas]

Depends on a game and genre. I'd say around 10-20 hours for shooters and action adventure games, but with tactical games, Yakuza's or racing games with good career modes I'm happy when it's 50+. 100 hours is usually enough no matter the genre.

 

[ToneyJ]

10-20 is perfect.

Maybe 8-10 hours for action games meant to be replayed.

 

[Fbh]

For most games I'd say 10-20.
For RPGs I think the main story being 20-30 with another 10-20 of optional side content is great.

I don't have a preference. If they give me quality and no filler, I will be glad there's lot of it.

Silksong and E33 has lots of top quality content. On the other side of the spectrum you have Ubisoft. I'd pay the same price for a refined AC experience instead of a 100-hour slop.

Yeah I agree.
My problem with long games isn't really that they are long, it's that the vast majority of them feel like they run out of steam way before they are actually over

 

[Rival]

Depends on the type of game. Like Last of Us part 2 I felt like it dragged on a bit too much. Some strategy game or rpgs I can play endlessly. A standard PS style single peer game make that 16-20 hours and I'm good with it.

 

[NeverYouMind]

~6 hours with great replayability.

 

[cireza]

Where is the 200+ hours option?

Back then I had a friend that logged 1 entire year of playing in 3 years. So basically, 8 hours per day for 3 years in a row.

 

[Stratostar]

 

[MagiusNecros]

Back then I had a friend that logged 1 entire year of playing in 3 years. So basically, 8 hours per day for 3 years in a row.

That's a bit much.

 

[ReBurn]

15 or 20 minutes

 

[Melon Husk]

10-20 hours but replayable

 

[forsakkenSoul]

It really depends on the type of game and how good the story is. If it's an RPG like Dragon Age, with a large world to explore, interesting characters and a good amount of side quests, you can't really expect it to be finished in less than 15 hours. I recently completed Dragon Age: Origins and it took me almost 70 hours, which felt like a reasonable amount of time for what it offered.

For more linear games with less exploration and depth, I think something around 10 to 20 hours is ideal. Anything longer than that really needs to have an exceptional story to make the extra time worth it.

 

[simpatico]

Dark Souls is perfect in a lot of ways, but none more so than breadth.