Really? You don't count Casino Royale as more recent and great?
I don't think it's great, no. It's a good Bond film, but none of them would make my all time list.
Really? You don't count Casino Royale as more recent and great?
Not sure what you mean by "great" but 100 years from now people will look at the box office numbers and say, "Damn, they loved that Avatar movie."
I'm assuming some of GAF hates Skyfall for some reason since it hasn't been mentioned yet.
Is this thread about the last classic action film, or great one?.. Because 2014 was full of great action films.
I agree with this to a big extent.
A brutal big budget romp, dry humour with A-Listers hamming it up, memorable relatable sub-characters with Terrorists duking it out violently in New York with bombs amongst other things
You will not see this kind of movie ever again. Dat initial explosion and the Subway Bomb would never make it.
You'd be correct. But I'll elaborate a little. Start with the trailers that alluded to some serious "mission gone wrong" mindfucks. Leading you to believe "skyfall" was actually a mission that bond thought he'd completed, rather than.....the name of thee ranch he grew up on? What? That's the whole skyfall reveal?
Then how about its only Daniel Craigs third movie and all movie long he is referred to as a relic who is over the hill.....he just got double 0 status! And wasn't the reason they brought him in in the first place was to get back to young bond? Back when he was a bruiser and wasn't the suave debonair agent that he's been with sean connory and pierce brosnan? Yet already they act like he's too old to do the job???
Then lets talk about the fact that Quantum of Solace was a direct sequel to Casino Royale. At the end of Solace the storyline has not yet been resolved, and were lead to believe the next movie will be a continuation of that storyline, yet skyfall has nothing to do with royale or solace, and in fact seems to take place 20 years later, I mean if I'm to assume bond is no longer young like he was supposed to be in royale it must have been much later.
Skyfall was a dissapointment in every imaginable way. Even the action and pacing were poor.
Edge of Tomorrow was pretty good.
Also Dredd
Good:
John Carter (Worts and all)
The Lone Ranger (Despite the bad framing device of the story)
Guardians of the Galaxy (Under developed supporting characters and all)
Great:
MI: 4
Jack Reacher
Edge of Tomorrow
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
I will agree that Edge of Tomorrow truly fits the OP's criteria.
The not so big budget John Wick and Dredd films do too.
To me those things aren't interchangeable.
2014 was full of good action films, some had great aspects, but none had the full package.
No mention of Dredd and Rambo 4? Or are we only counting movies with 100+ Million dollar budgets?
These seem like incredible shallow reasons that have nothing to do with the movie itself. Why would anyone care about how the title ties in to the movie? And why would that make it terrible if it wasn't what you expected? Daniel Craig was never young Bond. Dude was like 40 when they casted him for Casino Royale. Bond can never really be a young guy, he needs to seem seasoned yet still attractive.
Leaving behind the Quantum plot from QoS was a positive in my eyes, because QoS's plot was really strange and uninteresting, and they never did a good job of making the organization Quantum seem particularly menacing or interesting. The villain's big bad plot in the movie is to blackmail a general in some South American country to have to buy overpriced water owned by the villain...
The third act was disappointing. All I could think of, all I can still think of, is that I watched a grown-up version of Home Alone unfurl on screen. Some of the action was really silly and Silva met with a really dumb ending as I recall as well (but at least I remember his name, unlike the guy in QoS).
No, people keep mentioning Dredd.
They shouldn't. It wasn't big budget. It was mid-budget. It wasn't really a "hollywood action film," either. In fact, everyone kept saying it was ripping off "The Raid," (it wasn't) which is about as not-Hollywood as you can get. Plus it was independently produced, and was only distributed by a "Hollywood" studio (Lionsgate)
No, people keep mentioning Dredd.
They shouldn't. It wasn't big budget. It was mid-budget. It wasn't really a "hollywood action film," either. In fact, everyone kept saying it was ripping off "The Raid," (it wasn't) which is about as not-Hollywood as you can get.
Dredd was fun as hell. So was Rambo. Neither of them were big-budget Hollywood action films. Rambo was a mid-budget actioner as well, made out of country and with not a lot of Hollywood dollars.
I think you need to set some parameters for what you mean by both "Big-Budget," "Hollywood" and "Action Movies"
For example, a "Hollywood" movie usually means it came out of the American studio system, and had at least half of its budget paid for by one of the big studios: Universal, Fox, Disney, Sony/Columbia, Warners, etc. etc.
I thought Dredd was mostly a UK production?
No, people keep mentioning Dredd.
They shouldn't. It wasn't big budget. It was mid-budget. It wasn't really a "hollywood action film," either. In fact, everyone kept saying it was ripping off "The Raid," (it wasn't) which is about as not-Hollywood as you can get. Plus it was independently produced, and was only distributed by a "Hollywood" studio (Lionsgate)
Dredd was fun as hell. So was Rambo. Neither of them were big-budget Hollywood action films. Rambo was a mid-budget actioner as well, made out of country and with not a lot of Hollywood dollars.
I think you need to set some parameters for what you mean by both "Big-Budget," "Hollywood" and "Action Movies"
For example, a "Hollywood" movie usually means it came out of the American studio system, and had at least half of its budget paid for by one of the big studios: Universal, Fox, Disney, Sony/Columbia, Warners, etc. etc.
You're over analyzing the question...
What about White House Down? I enjoyed that movie a lot but I don't know if it fits all the criteria.
Anyone got any Prediction's if any 2015 films will scratch the same itch? I figure Fury Road could be one, maybe the Force Awakens too. I'm really optimistic for the new Mad Max. The Trailer looked like what I thought future action flicks would be like when I was a kid.