What's so bad about Killzone?
- Thread starter Littleberu
- Start date
Mister Zimbu
Member
dark10x said:
Yes, it is. Halo 2 has NOTHING on ut2k4.
How does overhype talk about the quality of the game? I keep seeing this futile argument over and over again to bash Halo2 (among others), when the hype a game amasses has absolutely no impact on the quality of the game... only on expectations, which are typically an extremely personal affair.
[/random rantish question]
[/random rantish question]
Musashi Wins!
FLAWLESS VICTOLY!
Wario64 said:
ohhh man it's teh shit!1! it's like ut2004 made luv to half-life!
It's fun. It's not especially feature filled. It's not as good as SOCOM.
Mister Zimbu said:
What do you mean? UT2004 has shit close quarters play mechanics and great long range while it's the opposite for Halo 2. The gameplay in both games is very solid and I think Halo 2's online matching system is quite brilliant as well. I do tend to prefer Halo 2 at this point, however, as I can't stand the jump fest that is UT combat. Onslaught mode is really the only worthwhile mode in the game at this point. I've grown out of the rest. Too simple, too dated.
What's the problem?
Usually people who make comments like this are the ones who are least likely to have played any PC FPS online in the first place.
yes..thats why i have call of duty ( with expansion) battlefield 1942,battlefield forgotten hope mod,battlefield vietnam,battlefield desert combat, unreal tournament 2004.operation flashpoint and a miriad of mods and addons,day of defeat,counterstrike ghost recon and all the addons
yeas..i dont have played any pc fps in the first place
xbox live will do for some console guys.but side to side ( plus pc online is FREE) with the pc online scene its almost a gamespy matchmaking and nothing else,plus the ppl who pay the service must do as a server, when u play a 60 players battlefield battle u will understand what i mean
yes..thats why i have call of duty ( with expansion) battlefield 1942,battlefield forgotten hope mod,battlefield vietnam,battlefield desert combat, unreal tournament 2004.operation flashpoint and a miriad of mods and addons,day of defeat,counterstrike ghost recon and all the addons
yeas..i dont have played any pc fps in the first place
xbox live will do for some console guys.but side to side ( plus pc online is FREE) with the pc online scene its almost a gamespy matchmaking and nothing else,plus the ppl who pay the service must do as a server, when u play a 60 players battlefield battle u will understand what i mean
Zer0 said:
How much is your internet connection? I ask of course becuase it's not free is it? Give that people pay different monthly fees for thier internet connections and being that Xbox Live will set you back a couple of candy bars for a month I think you should put this card back up your sleeve. It's a fanboys argument and it's stupid.
GamerDiva said:
Maybe sending it through Altavista might help?
ENG to JPN to ENG translation:
"This PC FPS of beginning being the online, as to be least been something which truth seems, usually the people who comment. Me (expansion of obligation) the battlefield 1942 of battlefields the call of the desired family which is forgotten, flash point and miriad and addons of battle and non realistic tournament 2004.operation of the desert of Vietnam and the battlefield of mods and day of defeat, why it possesses counterstrike recon illusion depending upon the battlefield whether and all addons yes. thats yeas. i when the play of u which does not do fps of PC of beginning fight u of the battlefield of 60 players understanding, the will where xbox has lived because of the console guys.but side PC and it is free) almost it takes part the PC online scene and (the online Gamespy matchmaking it does for the sake of, those which I mean ppl which service without fail pays necessity and it does what, as the server"
There we go, it's atleast understandable now :lol