• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Whats the pinnacle of animated film?

My favourite animated movie is Shrek because it has a little bit of something for everybody. From humour, action, romance, adult references and a solid third act, it's the complete package when it comes to covering all the audience needs. I'm referring to Western animation and not specifically efforts from Japan and other countries as those would have a separate category in my opinion.

s-l1600.jpg
 

Happosai

Hold onto your panties
Watership Down, Fire and Ice, Peter Pan, Mulan.
Sorta a mixed bag there but I like the mention of Fire & Ice and Watership Down. Watership Down really was overshadowed as a classic film for those who had not read the book. It's a great one but it would have looked greater had Don Bluth picked it up. Unfortunately, he was still working with Disney during the production if I recall.

I posted a video above of the rotoscoping process shot in Fire & Ice.

There's a bit of contrast between Peter Pan & Mulan. Peter Pan had amazing animation and an amazing production team. Mulan I have in my animation collection but of the Disney Renaissance...it wasn't my favorite. The character designs (not sure who was the key designer...) but it came off looking more like a film adaptation of the art-style Disney Saturday morning shorts were drawn. It didn't get that polished look that you see in Aladdin, Beauty & the Beast or The Little Mermaid. It sorta came off cartoony and feels like by this time Disney was relying heavily on Pixar to cross-over CGI at that time for the visual effects. Just a couple years prior, when animators at Disney wanted something to look at bit more 'real' without using practical measure; they'd hire on the Xerox teams which actually did an amazing job and was much more realistic than modern CGI.

Overall, it's a fun movie (Mulan) but not quite peak in my opinion. I like it too but I didn't see it until I was studying animation about 5-years after it's release; it just felt out of place. To me, Mulan wasn't even the movie that ended the animation side of the Disney Renaissance. According to Disney it ended with Tarzan but I feel it ended the Lion King (looking at the crazy production process) but had one last breath with Pocahontas. Pocahontas gets a lot of bad reviews for that era but from a former storyboard/layout artist perspective...it was a masterpiece in animation (regardless of how flawed the story was). They literally had over 55 animators studying a live model and pencil testing (eventually animating) every expression individually for Pocahontas. That's peak and I think everything sorta dropped from there. Nothing else ever really went that heavy into production with Disney.
 

Happosai

Hold onto your panties
My favourite animated movie is Shrek because it has a little bit of something for everybody. From humour, action, romance, adult references and a solid third act, it's the complete package when it comes to covering all the audience needs. I'm referring to Western animation and not specifically efforts from Japan and other countries as those would have a separate category in my opinion.

s-l1600.jpg
Shrek always felt to me like Dreamworks' first and last great animated film. It's the single CG animated movie that I've gone as far as buying the blu-ray collector's set of. Personally, I despise animation being run entirely with computer without any traditional method. My wife showed me Shrek some 20-years after it came out and I said, "they got it!" I mean, the spirit of what makes a great animated film was all there and it was original. No one else had this story and it was done right. I believe this final version was much better than the earlier planned version with Chris Farley which likely would have been hand drawn. Now the sequels...2 and 4 were good. 3...really didn't move me. Thanks for posting this.
 
There are so many, almost too many to count, but I'm gonna have to give it to Spider-verse.
The latest puss in boots is great too.
For stop motion I'm gonna say paranorman.
 

Ballthyrm

Member
Shocked there aren't more mentions of this. Absolutely bonkers animation. Can't wait for the sequel.



It is quite recent and for my own opinion benefit a bit too much from the glow up it had over the people not used to see anything else other than Pixar / Disney / Dreamwork style for animated movies.

Sure, it's great, for a american feature animation movie quite bold with artistic choices.

But if you grew up like me watching all kind of fucked up anime from a young age and consume a very broad style of european animated movie, spiderverse may not be as shocking or off the wall as it may have been for people used to cookie cutter animation (however great that animation may be)

It's a good movie, lots of very innovative stuff, but no more than older movies than have already been cited.

The second one is looking good, i'm happy sony keeping the hold on it.
 
Sorta a mixed bag there but I like the mention of Fire & Ice and Watership Down. Watership Down really was overshadowed as a classic film for those who had not read the book. It's a great one but it would have looked greater had Don Bluth picked it up. Unfortunately, he was still working with Disney during the production if I recall.

I posted a video above of the rotoscoping process shot in Fire & Ice.

There's a bit of contrast between Peter Pan & Mulan. Peter Pan had amazing animation and an amazing production team. Mulan I have in my animation collection but of the Disney Renaissance...it wasn't my favorite. The character designs (not sure who was the key designer...) but it came off looking more like a film adaptation of the art-style Disney Saturday morning shorts were drawn. It didn't get that polished look that you see in Aladdin, Beauty & the Beast or The Little Mermaid. It sorta came off cartoony and feels like by this time Disney was relying heavily on Pixar to cross-over CGI at that time for the visual effects. Just a couple years prior, when animators at Disney wanted something to look at bit more 'real' without using practical measure; they'd hire on the Xerox teams which actually did an amazing job and was much more realistic than modern CGI.

Overall, it's a fun movie (Mulan) but not quite peak in my opinion. I like it too but I didn't see it until I was studying animation about 5-years after it's release; it just felt out of place. To me, Mulan wasn't even the movie that ended the animation side of the Disney Renaissance. According to Disney it ended with Tarzan but I feel it ended the Lion King (looking at the crazy production process) but had one last breath with Pocahontas. Pocahontas gets a lot of bad reviews for that era but from a former storyboard/layout artist perspective...it was a masterpiece in animation (regardless of how flawed the story was). They literally had over 55 animators studying a live model and pencil testing (eventually animating) every expression individually for Pocahontas. That's peak and I think everything sorta dropped from there. Nothing else ever really went that heavy into production with Disney.
Watership Down certainly would have looked better and smoother with Don Bluth at the helm but I personally think it probably would have lost a lot of it's charm. It most likely wouldn't have featured blood and some one the characters wouldn't have looked as disgusting. The movie Plague Dogs has a very similar animation style. I'm not sure if the particular style has a specific name but many things about both movies have a very realistic, brutal and dreary feel to them even in scenes that are portraying something beautiful. Something that other animation studios didn't do at the time as far as I'm aware.

Understand exactly what you're sating about Mulan. I just think there tons of cool shots in that movie that benefitted from the CGI implementation. I'm certainly more of a fan of hand animation though. Peter Pan is definitely a better movie in every aspect.

And I totally agree about Pocahontas. That movie is incredible. And the songs especially are so good. Which is probably why I like Mulan so much too haha. The plot is what it is but I'm not sure they could have done anything much better with the movie's material. I never realized that many people worked on the animation for it. If I recall, Mother Willow is also partial CGI.
 

Happosai

Hold onto your panties
Watership Down certainly would have looked better and smoother with Don Bluth at the helm but I personally think it probably would have lost a lot of it's charm. It most likely wouldn't have featured blood and some one the characters wouldn't have looked as disgusting. The movie Plague Dogs has a very similar animation style. I'm not sure if the particular style has a specific name but many things about both movies have a very realistic, brutal and dreary feel to them even in scenes that are portraying something beautiful. Something that other animation studios didn't do at the time as far as I'm aware.

Understand exactly what you're sating about Mulan. I just think there tons of cool shots in that movie that benefitted from the CGI implementation. I'm certainly more of a fan of hand animation though. Peter Pan is definitely a better movie in every aspect.

And I totally agree about Pocahontas. That movie is incredible. And the songs especially are so good. Which is probably why I like Mulan so much too haha. The plot is what it is but I'm not sure they could have done anything much better with the movie's material. I never realized that many people worked on the animation for it. If I recall, Mother Willow is also partial CGI.
Bluth's animators weren't shy on blood (which is shown a couple times in Secret of NIHM) but agreed that the final product we have is great. The three movies I'd put into that category as 'real' (exuding Bakshi films which were known for being targeted for adults) would be: Watership Down, The Plague Dogs and The Last Unicorn. Heck, check out the different animator segments in the Garfield: His 9-Lives movie...it wasn't for kids either and had some incredible animation beyond the general Phil Roman / Lee Mendleson style (which does appear in a few segments)

I think Disney would have impressed more with Mulan if they'd taken a step back on the CG scenes and thought about a Xerox team. Cross-over animation worked better that way.

Pocahantas almost didn't happen due to the numerous production setbacks and other corporate issues Disney was juggling in 94/95. The Goofy Movie came out the same year as a "contractual settlement" and means to outsource their cinematic toon studio. Pocahantas I think was in the early production stages around the time of Aladdin but in typical Disney style...they wanted something else. The final production similar to Beauty & the Beast was the result of production delays, turnover and Disney simply struggling (without moral support from their corporate ladder), to keep their animation department alive.

There was CG used in the final production of the film. Mother Willow did originally have a b & w pencil test but it ultimately came down to only painting the background and inserting a CG face in later in post-production.
 
For me it’s gotta be Ninja Scroll. I’m just talking from an artistic, animation view and I wanna say without looking it up that it’s all hand drawn? Someone correct me if I’m wrong please.
 

STARSBarry

Gold Member


As much as I love Do You Remember Love... I just adore Macross Plus even more. The events are ignored in Macross 7 (which came after) outside a few of Sharon Apples songs being played. But I kind of wish they would do a follow up with the consequences of Sharon Apple and AI within the universe, rather than the ultra generic idol stuff of Frontier and Delta.

Honestly with how virtual idols are actually a thing in Japan now, it would be more relevant than ever.
 
Last edited:

tkscz

Member
the-secret-of-nimh.%7Bformat%7D


p9651_p_v8_ae.jpg


MV5BNDVhZjVmZWYtYTE0OC00MGFjLWI1YWQtZmJhNmE5NzI4ZWE4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMzczMzE2ODM@._V1_.jpg

Don Bluth's original Trilogy of movies that went WAY harder than they needed to.

I get that he and his team wanted to go after Disney, but Disney in the 80's (until Great Mouse Detective) wasn't exactly releasing anything that impressive.

These three movies have SOUL. Each of them in their own way being far more gut wrenching than they needed to be, but was exactly what they needed to give them that drive.

Bluth's animation style has something spectacularly whimsical about it. Just the way he does water, lighting, shadow and particles is still unmatched in terms of 2D. Characters are so expressive that silent scenes can be felt by face alone.

Plus Bluth knows how to draw and animated a fat woman and I have to give him props for that
tumblr_mwrd95K3EQ1r9isu5o2_250.gifv
ImaginativeValuableIvorybilledwoodpecker-max-1mb.gif

I don't think there is a better animated movie at portraying what a mother would go through for her children than the secret of NIHM and how fucked up NIHM itself was. Admittedly I haven't seen this one in a while and I need to rewatch it.

My god, I STILL get chills when Fievel finally reunits with his family just because of every moment they don't meet up but are literal feet away. It killed me as a kid when his family finally saw he was alive only for him to fall into a pit. He lived, but they weren't aware and you can feel that.

Land Before Time made me numb to the death in Lion King cause you can't top the death of Littlefoot's mom. God as she spoke to him you can here the life fading from her the actress did way too well. The difficulty of their journey could be felt. The absolute defeat when the bigger dinosaurs stole their food in that one scene still pisses me off. The fuckers ran through a damn mountain wall to steal it and they just left. I hated every moment of that scene.
 

Happosai

Hold onto your panties
the-secret-of-nimh.%7Bformat%7D


p9651_p_v8_ae.jpg


MV5BNDVhZjVmZWYtYTE0OC00MGFjLWI1YWQtZmJhNmE5NzI4ZWE4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMzczMzE2ODM@._V1_.jpg

Don Bluth's original Trilogy of movies that went WAY harder than they needed to.

I get that he and his team wanted to go after Disney, but Disney in the 80's (until Great Mouse Detective) wasn't exactly releasing anything that impressive.

These three movies have SOUL. Each of them in their own way being far more gut wrenching than they needed to be, but was exactly what they needed to give them that drive.

Bluth's animation style has something spectacularly whimsical about it. Just the way he does water, lighting, shadow and particles is still unmatched in terms of 2D. Characters are so expressive that silent scenes can be felt by face alone.

Plus Bluth knows how to draw and animated a fat woman and I have to give him props for that
tumblr_mwrd95K3EQ1r9isu5o2_250.gifv
ImaginativeValuableIvorybilledwoodpecker-max-1mb.gif

I don't think there is a better animated movie at portraying what a mother would go through for her children than the secret of NIHM and how fucked up NIHM itself was. Admittedly I haven't seen this one in a while and I need to rewatch it.

My god, I STILL get chills when Fievel finally reunits with his family just because of every moment they don't meet up but are literal feet away. It killed me as a kid when his family finally saw he was alive only for him to fall into a pit. He lived, but they weren't aware and you can feel that.

Land Before Time made me numb to the death in Lion King cause you can't top the death of Littlefoot's mom. God as she spoke to him you can here the life fading from her the actress did way too well. The difficulty of their journey could be felt. The absolute defeat when the bigger dinosaurs stole their food in that one scene still pisses me off. The fuckers ran through a damn mountain wall to steal it and they just left. I hated every moment of that scene.
Aside from the stories...Bluth was willing to push his teams to give Disney-level animation output but target a much broader audience. He dove further in fantasy and realism than 80's Disney wanted. The impossible happened too. He beat Disney and possibly put the pressure on them which started their Renaissance after the Land Before Time crushed Oliver & Company at the box office. He hit a snag after All Dogs Go to Heaven and his films became more mediocre in the 90's. But his team (despite encounter multiple financial issues) in the 80's was peak for that decade.

Now, if Katzenberg had not cut up the assembly version of the Black Cauldron...Disney may have gone head to head.
 

tkscz

Member
Aside from the stories...Bluth was willing to push his teams to give Disney-level animation output but target a much broader audience. He dove further in fantasy and realism than 80's Disney wanted. The impossible happened too. He beat Disney and possibly put the pressure on them which started their Renaissance after the Land Before Time crushed Oliver & Company at the box office. He hit a snag after All Dogs Go to Heaven and his films became more mediocre in the 90's. But his team (despite encounter multiple financial issues) in the 80's was peak for that decade.

Now, if Katzenberg had not cut up the assembly version of the Black Cauldron...Disney may have gone head to head.
Bluth is a lot like George Lucas in that left unchecked the story of his movies tend to go off the handle. The original 3 from the 80s were heavily supervised by Spielberg who dropped Bluth's team after Land Before Time, which is why things felt off with All Dogs go to Heaven and onward (though I still enjoy that movie and Rockadoodle).
 

gow3isben

Member
- Lion King
- Mulan
- Kung Fu Panda
- Megamind
- Hercules
- Tarzan
- An American Tale
- Tangled
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom