If you've ever been in a full stadium at a real match you know why. It's more than just a sport, it's more than just about winning or losing, it's more than fun. It's an identity that unites.
i take it you won't be supporting the USA come the world cup?
I have no trouble understanding people supporting non-winning teams.
My issue in soccer is that mid level teams aren't exciting to watch. Soccer is such a difficult sport that unless its being played at a high level, it often just looks sloppy and amateurish most of the time.
5 years ago my team were placed into administration and were relegated to the 3rd tier of English football.
This season we sit 8th in the Premier League and are one of the best teams to watch in the league.
It's been a pretty great fucking ride.
Why do you Americans like socialism in sport so much anyway?
What happens when (hypothetically speaking of course because the same four teams always win, etc) your team needs to host the championship final in their 2,000 seat capacity "stadium"?5 years ago my team were placed into administration and were relegated to the 3rd tier of English football.
This season we sit 8th in the Premier League and are one of the best teams to watch in the league.
It's been a pretty great fucking ride.
What happens when (hypothetically speaking of course because the same four teams always win, etc) your team needs to host the championship final in their 2,000 seat capacity "stadium"?
i think the more pertinent question would be, how do you feel that your mid-table club has no fucking shot of ever winning the league? Every year it is the same fucking teams contending for the title.
What happens when (hypothetically speaking of course because the same four teams always win, etc) your team needs to host the championship final in their 2,000 seat capacity "stadium"?
What happens when (hypothetically speaking of course because the same four teams always win, etc) your team needs to host the championship final in their 2,000 seat capacity "stadium"?
I don't see how that worked out for Southampton. You sold a proven talent to another team who then flipped him for 10 times what you were compensated for.we did have a chance to keep him, he was under contract and an asset of the club. but realistically, it makes more sense to cash out and strengthen the team elsewhere, because out-of-contract players can move for free. now we have luke shaw instead in bale's position, another academy success!
and maybe he'll be sold this summer too, which would disappoint me as a fan. but the system ultimately works because it encourages teams like southampton to develop their own players in a sustainable manner, and the effects of this are felt through the years.
my childhood hero was matt le tissier, one of the most talented players in the country at the time and yet he chose to stay with southampton for his entire career. there's nothing stopping players doing that now, but if they don't want to stick around it's best that they move on. i'm okay with it it's part of supporting the team. i like knowing that i'm not following a bunch of mercenaries.
I don't see how that worked out for Southampton. You sold a proven talent to another team who then flipped him for 10 times what you were compensated for.
I support Sheffield Wednesday, my home town team.
Fair point about the proven thing. I still think it's a problem though. If the lower tier teams were consistent in their ability to monetize their talent you might see more variety at the top, but you don't.Spurs were about to sell Bale for dramatically less than they paid for him before he had is breakout season with them
He wasn't exactly proven when he left us with a handfull of games at LB in the championship.
It's kind of impossible right now. Top teams can offer way higher salaries and have the added plus of playing for a team with better players and possibly contending for trophies. Players will always want to leave their current clubs for a club that offers 10x the salary and more, barring very few exceptions(not counting players like Totti, Gerrard, Xavi and Del Piero who've always played for a (semi-)top team and earn shitloads of money, except maybe Del Piero who relegated with his team like a bunch of other players).Fair point about the proven thing. I still think it's a problem though. If the lower tier teams were consistent in their ability to monetize their talent you might see more variety at the top, but you don't.
European sports teams are not like american sport.
Teams are not franchises from brands.
You do not support for BULLS which now they're on chicago or LAKERS they're now on Los Angeles.
Teams are attached to a city and sponsors is just a way to get money. European sports teams have territorial, political and economical feelings. That's why.
I don't want to get too sidetracked, but that's the reason i don't understand the popularity of college sports in the US. I'm not a big fan of the major american sports but i would assume that the skill disparity between the leagues and the college teams is huge, why is it that they're so successful anyway?
That is the coolest name for a team that I have ever heard.
That is the coolest name for a team that I have ever heard.
I absolutely love it.
Completely unique as far as I know in world football. Particularly in a country full of Towns, United's, City's, Wanderers and Rovers.
Quite a lot of history behind that name as well. We were originally called just "The Wednesday" and were formed in 1867. "The Wednessay" were a cricket team before then for many years as well.
Here are some names I like (in English Football):
Shaw Lane Aquaforce
Roman Glass St George
Romulus
Thurnby Nirvana
Tytherington Rocks
Vauxhall Motors
Whitehawk
Arnold Town
Billingham Synthonia
Bemerton Heath Harlequins
Black Country Rangers
Cockfosters
Continental Star
Diss Town
Eversley & California
Godmanchester Rovers
Metropolitan Police
Northwich Victoria
Peacehaven & Telscombe
A full list is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_football_clubs_in_England
I absolutely love it.
Completely unique as far as I know in world football. Particularly in a country full of Towns, United's, City's, Wanderers and Rovers.
Quite a lot of history behind that name as well. We were originally called just "The Wednesday" and were formed in 1867. "The Wednessay" were a cricket team before then for many years as well.
My mum's local team was Abergavenny Thursdays. So there's that.
Not specifically related to that, but, as a result of that, I just learned there's a town in Wales whose English name is Mold.
i think the more pertinent question would be, how do you feel that your mid-table club has no fucking shot of ever winning the league? Every year it is the same fucking teams contending for the title.
Every time I see this thread I feel like writing something in it because it's football related. But I can't really say something on this matter. D:
Because it's your home team? To me it's disgusting that people that have no connection to a city or place root for some random ass team. It's like bitch you live in Nebraska. You root for the Royals, the Huskers, the Chiefs, and Creighton maybe. You don't get to root for the Dodgers.
What's the point in North American sports fans watching regular season games when they don't really matter in the grand scheme of things
That right there is a ridiculous question, and one I'd have on the same level as what the OP asked
Yeah, I actually stopped for a beer at a bar in Omaha when I was there a couple of years ago, and I can't remember the name of it, but it was all Yankees themed. They had all these jerseys hanging on the wall, maybe a statue of DiMaggio.
Saddest shit in the world.
Conversely, I don't get the point of supporting Bayern or Real Madrid. Oh look, we're going to win our 6th European Cup, etc. It's not like you haven't won it before.
So the point of cheering for any team is to experience success as a fan, almost like a leech attached to a carcass, sucking on the success, season after season? Reeks of desperation, "Yeah i like Miami Heat, Oklahoma City, San Antonio Spurs, Red Sox, Yankees, and [insert_team that won_the superbowl]
Are all american fans just plastic glory hunters? I doubt that. There is something romantic about cheering for your local team, no matter how small or insignificant it is. Its what sport is all about, the community, your friends, the legacy.
And that is why football (soakker) is the biggest sport in the world, it involves everyone on multiple levels. If you want to a be a fraud, plastic, glory hunter you can be that, if you want to be involved with your local team, you can do that, or you can just stick with your nation. Something for everyone.
I'm from Southeast Michigan, my teams are the Lions, Red Wings, Tigers, and Pistons. I've seen those 4 teams combine for about 8 championships in my lifetime, and they were some of the best fucking years of my life. What the OP is talking about (and later clarified despite being dogpiled by people who didn't read), is that he can't imagine being just as excited to move up a league or "not get relegated" as if it's some grand achievement for your team.
Exactly. North American fans don't "glory hunt" (we call it bandwagoning) anymore than European fans. The thing is, North American sports franchises - even if you cheer for teams that have won nothing for 50 years - Cleveland area sports teams for instance, those franchises are always aspiring to win their respective league championships. Cleveland Browns fans don't expect the Browns to win the Super Bowl every year. They expect the Browns to continue to build a team that can one day, down the road have a realistic chance of winning the Super Bowl.
What the OP is talking about (and later clarified despite being dogpiled by people who didn't read), is that he can't imagine being just as excited to move up a league or "not get relegated" as if it's some grand achievement for your team.
The only thing I don't like (cheering for Blackburn in the English Championship) is that it's virtually impossible to follow the team, given I don't live in England, now that they're not in the Premier League.
You support Blackburn Rovers...? I guess we can never truly be friends then.
Why in god's name did you choose to support them? Even if you're not from the UK?
But unless I'm mistaken most American sports don't have a league structure that allows a fight against relegation or progression (or plummet) through divisions in the same way that football does?
In England there are 92 teams spread across 4 professional divisions. And below that, there are numerous other national and regional "non-league" levels where the same relegation/promotion rules apply. There's a vastly greater spectrum of movement that teams can potentially climb or fall, and thus a far greater spectrum of relative success.
The vast majority of football teams and football fans will never see their team win the Premier League. Most will never see their team win a major trophy. So "success" can and has to be found elsewhere.
A "great escape" for a relegation threatened team can feel just as euphoric for the fans of that club as winning a trophy feels for the big teams. Arguably more so, given how rare those moments are for the vast majority of teams and fans in the game.
I think the OP's point of this thread was that is NEVER going to happen for the vast majority of Euro football teams, which is sort of a shame and takes away a bit of drama I'm sure.
Someone posted that Herm Edwards .gif earlier and it's perfect. The entire point of pro sports in the US is "You play to win the game".