I had a mental crisis while trying to remember one. Usually the sequels of the franchises I played are miles away compared to their predecessors. Being way more polished, way more interesting or in general: BETTER.
And if the first game didn't get me, I would rarely bother playing the next ones.
However, Doom 3 is what probably stands out the most from my collection. Doom and Doom 2 were good, even in the time I played 'em.
Doom 3 just felt sluggish, and boring, totally different from the two. It had some good things like more bosses, cut scenes and stuff, but the whole "horror like" environment didn't work well with the shooter that the previous games were.
Also on PC was full of glitches and incompatibility errors, therefore rendering the game unbeatable (at least on the PC I had back then, maybe now it would work).
I would say I didn't like Doom 2016 either, but I can't label it as "bad sequel". It was just overrated.
For a mainstream console player was a bomb compared to the mediocre FPS released in the past years, but for me, who played tons of different shooter titles, it was just Doom 2 re-made and made super ignorant, without adding nothing specifically interesting (except Glory Kills, those were cool).