koam said:How exactly can a game look good technically? Wait you're not talking about graphics. What exactly are you asking for, technical in which area? more polys? more mapping features? better lighting?
You can take a piece of shit and apply 10 million graphic effects on it, but it will still be a piece of shit. A game like Riddick has lots of technical stuff going on, but because there's no art direction in the game, in 5 years, it will look like shit. Whearas a game that doesn't use many techniques but has good art direction, say Metroid Prime 2, will always look good.
Redbeard said:He's talking about graphics. You're talking about art.
And Riddick has great art direction, by the way.
Speevy said:Riddick - Great art direction? The only part I saw that even resembled art was the sky part at the end.
Characters were especially generic. Don't get me wrong. The normal mapping and the technical prowess of the whole prison is very impressive. But artistic it is not.
For a test, think about the various enemies, robots, weapons, and scenes in the game. Would you ever think about any of that and say to yourself "Wow, what a unique vision."
And I love Riddick. The 7 hours that it lasts are great.
koam said:Riddick does not have great art direction at all. It just looks good because of all the effects. I've played through most of it and i found it looked good, but it doesn't have much going for it in terms of art direction.
As for your first comment, what is the difference between graphics and art? You can't have graphics without art.
IJoel said:You people...
Riddick is, obviously, based on a movie. It has limitations in terms of art design. You can't really compare it from an art perspective because it does precisely what it needs to do in that department, given its limitations.
Now, Enclave, from the same developer, has some really great art elements, and some of the best texture work, to this day, on any platform.
koam said:That's a poor excuse. Look at the picture I showed of Riddick. Everything is blocks and squares and is carefully placed. Look at this random pic of the movie, notice how nothing is perfect looking.
![]()
Here's another
![]()
drohne said:i think re4 is the best looking console game to date, but there are dozens of games it doesn't "blow away." mgs3 is very nearly its equal. and from a strictly technical perspective, the 60fps ninja gaiden is its clear superior.
Kaijima said:From pure bleeding-edge display of hardware power, the Team Ninja XBox games overpower RE4. Regardless of any "plastic" or anime look, Ninja Gaiden are powerhouse examples. .
:lol :lolshpankey said:Hell, there's tons of games that look better than RE4, both technically and artisitically....
the 2 Prince of persia games (tops all in my opinion)
the 2 Halo games
SantaCruZer said:oh no...
cue 400 replies.
sirris said:RE4 would be the best if it actually used real spectral lighting. The models and environments are astounding. Accurate lighting is its only bane.
CrimsonSkies said:Dead or Alive Ultimate is about as good as it gets right now graphically on consoles.
nathkenn said:I just dont get the love for halo or ninja gaiden. I think the engineers who worked on the graphics engines are awesome but the art direction =\
shpankey said:Hell, there's tons of games that look better than RE4, both technically and artisitically....
the 2 Prince of persia games (tops all in my opinion)
the 2 Halo games
the new Oddworld Stranger game
DOA:U
GT4
Rallisport Challenge 2
Ninja Gaiden
Burnout 3
...just to name a few.
As far as GCN goes, it's definately the best you can get on that platform. But elsewhere there is a plenty that beats it.
except you contradict yourself here quite a bit, unless it wasnt actually prince of persia sot/ww that i played on my gamecube.shpankey said:Hell, there's tons of games that look better than RE4, both technically and artisitically....
the 2 Prince of persia games (tops all in my opinion)
the 2 Halo games
the new Oddworld Stranger game
DOA:U
GT4
Rallisport Challenge 2
Ninja Gaiden
Burnout 3
...just to name a few.
As far as GCN goes, it's definately the best you can get on that platform. But elsewhere there is a plenty that beats it.
Miburou said:Eh, RE4 looks great overall, but from a purely technical perspective it's not that hot. It's letter boxed all the time, runs at 30fps (with occasional slowdown), has some weird color banding, and the texture quality is inconsistent. I'd say Ninja Gaiden easily blows it away graphically.
nathkenn said:On my widescreen HD RE4 looks amazing in progressive scan, i never noticed any slowdown or graphical ugliness
Hahahahaah, imagine a carpet in that photograph!IJoel said:IT'S A PRISON!
![]()
Fire the architects for POOR ART! This real life prison has too many boxy structures!
Prine said:Riddick, Ninja Gaiden, DOA Ultimate and Rallisport Challenege 2
Just imagine how RE4 would look if it was specifically built for XBox :0 !!
koam said:Notice the lack of "squares". Everything is rounded or has some form of unique shape. The walls tiles each look different. There are imperfections that make it look more believable. The floor has carpeting with a nice motif on it. That's art direction.
Shaheed79 said:Actually I would definitely call that art direction. What else would you call it?
Redbeard said:I'd call it stylistic choice. RE4's art direction is not good because it has rounded shapes and decorative items strewn around, it's because of the color palette, the way the designers use light, shadow, and 3D space to evoke mood.
Personally I think the RE4 shot koam posted is a terrible example, as the lighting scheme is boring and undramatic.