Who here is still using 56k? (plus: pictures of attractive women)
- Thread starter Socreges
- Start date
- Status
Ned Flanders
Banned
I don't take it personally, but then again, I have a huge cock.
soundwave05
Member
Is that Elle Macpherson in the first pic?
Jill Sandwich
the turds of Optimus Prime
Glad it's safe for work!
I'm on dial up still, but not for much longer as my new house has a DSL socket, which saves me some stupid fee.
I'm on dial up still, but not for much longer as my new house has a DSL socket, which saves me some stupid fee.
I'm getting unlimited hours+downloads on DSL for a cheaper monthly fee than i used to pay for dialupMrPing1000
Member
photoshop girls really are unappealing to me
norinrad21
Banned
I really don't get the deal with Lohan, but anyway i will fuck Alba RAW
soundwave05
Member
Yes but who's nipples are those? :lol
That's Elle MacPherson, right?
That's Elle MacPherson, right?
fse
Member
C. Images
Images of a sexual or profane nature are discouraged. Images presenting exposed genitalia, bared buttocks, and/or female nipple/aureola are not allowed. Outside of this, common sense and a "safe-for-work" rule should be the primary considerations. Also, spamming the forum with the same image is not allowed and is subject to banning. Avatar image size should not be greater than 90 pixels by 120 pixels, and no greater than 150k in size.
Images of a sexual or profane nature are discouraged. Images presenting exposed genitalia, bared buttocks, and/or female nipple/aureola are not allowed. Outside of this, common sense and a "safe-for-work" rule should be the primary considerations. Also, spamming the forum with the same image is not allowed and is subject to banning. Avatar image size should not be greater than 90 pixels by 120 pixels, and no greater than 150k in size.
mattiewheels
And then the LORD David Bowie saith to his Son, Jonny Depp: 'Go, and spread my image amongst the cosmos. For every living thing is in anguish and only the LIGHT shall give them reprieve.'
This Creed fan speaks the truth.norinrad21 said:
Yes. I've been on dial-up since like 1993 or something like that. And yeah, I do take it personally when I see "56k no" or some other assclown message in a thread's title. Always wanting to set boundaries and look down on people.
Well, the jokes on you. I strike back the only way I know how. I run a clan of 56k disrupters. We swarm popular game servers and start hacking away at our CTF teammates all while causing you lag. Mwahahha!
I've been waiting YEARS for Verizon to bring DSL to my area. The only other option is some company that wants to charge $99 a month for a cable-modem connection. Despite being on dial-up for circumstances beyond my control, I am still ridiculed; therefore, until broadband users learn to have respect, if I see you playing HALO, your ass is mine.
Well, the jokes on you. I strike back the only way I know how. I run a clan of 56k disrupters. We swarm popular game servers and start hacking away at our CTF teammates all while causing you lag. Mwahahha!
I've been waiting YEARS for Verizon to bring DSL to my area. The only other option is some company that wants to charge $99 a month for a cable-modem connection. Despite being on dial-up for circumstances beyond my control, I am still ridiculed; therefore, until broadband users learn to have respect, if I see you playing HALO, your ass is mine.
I was still on 56k up until a couple months ago, and I never really understood why people would put 56k warnings on a post with just 1 picture. Hell, even in giant picture threads with tons of pictures everywhere, it just takes a few seconds longer for them to load... doesn't make my PC implode or anything.
- Status