• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Who is the most obscure NeoGAF member?

kretos

kretos

Banned
But since you mentioned that user and all of us notice him now how can he be obscure?

giphy.gif
 
Relativ9

Relativ9

Member
I feel like there are so many members that seem to have an air of fame/infamy around them in the way they're refereed to or treated by other members. To get to that level you'd have to post so much that you could never be considered obscure, but if you're not on that level I feel like you might as well be anonymous. So unless they're troll (and thus likely banned) I feel like it'd be hard to have the notoriety needed for anyone to nominate someone for this "prize" but have that person also still be mysterious/ambiguous enough to quality.

Cause if it's just whoever has a long standing account with zero/little posting history than I'm assuming thousands of members would qualify with equal standing.
 
O-N-E

O-N-E

Member
MiyazakiHatesKojima said:
I've always loved discovering an obscure member on GAF.

Whether it was someone who was here since the 2000's or someone with a peculiar avatar and mysterious aura to them.

For me personally, I think the most obscure NeoGAF has to be D Dr.Uckmann because the chances of him being Neil Druckmann is very strong, but also strangely obscure.

Who's your most obscure NeoGAF member, GAF?
Click to expand...

I don't have a doubt D Dr.Uckmann is Neil.
 
F

Foamy

Unconfirmed Member
Relativ9 said:
I feel like there are so many members that seem to have an air of fame/infamy around them in the way they're refereed to or treated by other members. To get to that level you'd have to post so much that you could never be considered obscure, but if you're not on that level I feel like you might as well be anonymous. So unless they're troll (and thus likely banned) I feel like it'd be hard to have the notoriety needed for anyone to nominate someone for this "prize" but have that person also still be mysterious/ambiguous enough to quality.
Click to expand...

Tell us how you really feel.
 
Relativ9

Relativ9

Member
Foamy said:
Tell us how you really feel.
Click to expand...

I feel like I'm being persecuted for saying how I feel, I feel like that has no place on GAF and expressing what I feel like should be not only allowed but encouraged. I feel like it goes without saying that when writing a post on a forum not a lot of thought was put into the quality of the writing or sentence structure. I feel like there are also a lot of other faults you could point out from the two lines you quoted about what I feel like, for example; right before saying "I feel like" after the first "I feel like", I wrote "they're troll" which I have no idea why I wrote, I feel like I probably meant to say "they're trolling" turning the noun into a verb so it makes sense with the context and the plural "they're"...but I feel like that's neither here nor there.

No but yeah that's a bad habit of mine, i used to say "ikke sant?" all the time when I was younger (essentially norwegian for "right?") after statements, I finally kicked the habit after going into uni and having to do more presentations and I feel like :)D) I've mostly lost all that now, but I do still have some phrases I overuse from time to time...I think of them as my own personal Sorkanisms (just far more frequent, and less poetic/charming) :D

On topic, @Foamy has an avatar I've seen around a bunch without being able to hold you to any sort of personality trait; kinda obscure. Young account though.
 
Last edited:
BlackOlivesMatter

BlackOlivesMatter

Banned
Relativ9 said:
I feel like I'm being persecuted for saying how I feel, I feel like that has no place on GAF and expressing what I feel like should be not only allowed but encouraged. I feel like it goes without saying that when writing a post on a forum not a lot of thought was put into the quality of the writing or sentence structure. I feel like there are also a lot of other faults you could point out from the two lines you quoted about what I feel like, for example; right before saying "I feel like" after the first "I feel like", I wrote "they're troll" which I have no idea why I wrote, I feel like I probably meant to say "they're trolling" turning the noun into a verb so it makes sense with the context and the plural "they're"...but I feel like that's neither here nor there.

No but yeah that's a bad habit of mine, i used to say "ikke sant?" all the time when I was younger (essentially norwegian for "right?") after statements, I finally kicked the habit after going into uni and having to do more presentations and I feel like :)D) I've mostly lost all that now, but I do still have some phrases I overuse from time to time...I think of them as my own personal Sorkanisms (just far more frequent, and less poetic/charming) :D

On topic, @Foamy has an avatar I've seen around a bunch without being able to hold you to any sort of personality trait; kinda obscure. Young account though.
Click to expand...
Let me guess, you're an ass scientist too
 
Tesseract

Tesseract

Banned
Relativ9 said:
I feel like there are so many members that seem to have an air of fame/infamy around them in the way they're refereed to or treated by other members. To get to that level you'd have to post so much that you could never be considered obscure, but if you're not on that level I feel like you might as well be anonymous. So unless they're troll (and thus likely banned) I feel like it'd be hard to have the notoriety needed for anyone to nominate someone for this "prize" but have that person also still be mysterious/ambiguous enough to quality.

Cause if it's just whoever has a long standing account with zero/little posting history than I'm assuming thousands of members would qualify with equal standing.
Click to expand...
good ideas go up, bad ideas go down

the rest is in your head, m8
 
GAMETA

GAMETA

Banned
Relativ9 said:
I feel like there are so many members that seem to have an air of fame/infamy around them in the way they're refereed to or treated by other members. To get to that level you'd have to post so much that you could never be considered obscure, but if you're not on that level I feel like you might as well be anonymous. So unless they're troll (and thus likely banned) I feel like it'd be hard to have the notoriety needed for anyone to nominate someone for this "prize" but have that person also still be mysterious/ambiguous enough to quality.

Cause if it's just whoever has a long standing account with zero/little posting history than I'm assuming thousands of members would qualify with equal standing.
Click to expand...

It's like this in every forum out there. You're either a known user or a random.

I find it hard to get traction here on GAF, maybe it's a language/humor/cultural barrier as well..

Anyways, gotta flood, bro!
 
Last edited:
SirTerry-T

SirTerry-T

Member
That fella (?) with the funny thing in his avatar...you know the one. Like a funny little thing doing a thing.
Pete something?

Nah, just remembered, got confused with that fella on the internet.
Carry on.
 
Last edited:
F

Foamy

Unconfirmed Member
I've been told im one of the most important Neogaf members. Or was it impudent?
Maybe it was Impotent?
Well it was one of those words anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Virtues of Ancient Rome
45
2K
Liljagare replied
Korean Netflix Show Review: Mr Plankton *SPOILERS*
12
11K
near replied
  • Locked
Politics... be always careful what you wish for.
4
926
TehDark replied
Introducing Improvements for NeoGAF Gold Live Updates
Staff 2 3
146
11K
GigaBowser replied
Life is Strange: Double Exposure | Review Thread
Analysis Review
17
2K
rkofan87 replied
Top Bottom