If you've ever wanted to try sweat, jizz, and cheese together just lick a controller at your local gaming convention and taste the flavor of the new millennium!Eeeew. Haven't Chobot's parents taught her not to lick demo handhelds at gaming conventions?
If you've ever wanted to try sweat, jizz, and cheese together just lick a controller at your local gaming convention and taste the flavor of the new millennium!
If you've ever wanted to try sweat, jizz, and cheese together just lick a controller at your local gaming convention and taste the flavor of the new millennium!
Are all of you guys still buying the Wii U at launch?
Wait what
chrome://echofon/content/user-view.xul?screen_name=Nova_Crystallis
"Wii U launches in September in Japan"
since this is also still a speculation thread...
Ok in that rumored specs list after E3 there is written "GPU referred to as GPU 7"
So what exactly does that mean?
If that refference comes from AMD then it is about the use of CrossfireX technology?
Could that mean Nintendo used an AMD like chipset with integrated graphics and boost that one with the additional GPU?
I know I'm a bit confused now but I love to speculate how it could be.
BTW here is the AMD link:
http://support.amd.com/de/kbarticles/Pages/737-GPU-7-Howtoconfiguremultiple.aspx
Or Jessica Chobot licking a Vita
I am more ashamed of myself for being turned on by that gifIs that a demo unit? Yum, delicious nerd hand gunk!
fixedIs it strange I had no idea who either of these people were...
Google tells me one is a former actor and the other is a child wrestler?
Riddle me this, though, how many of you are going digital only?
Yup, provably, but a bit reluctantly due to lack of quality third party announcements. I do think however, being Nintendo, I will get a lot of good games for me and my kids to play together. I also think there's a tonne of potential with the GamePad, so I hope Nintendo can capitalise on it. Oh, and Zelda and Metroid.Are all of you guys still buying the Wii U at launch?
No way. I am happy to buy digital for small games that I won't want to sell or dont care about keeping. However for games I might want to play in the future, I trust my cupboard more than I trust a company to keep them on their servers.Riddle me this, though, how many of you are going digital only?
And another embarassing Wii U thread on the gaming side
Lawd forgive us!
Embarrassing? I'm not sure what you m- gyaaaaauuuurggh :-/
Coming soon: "How would Jesus have presented Wii U at E3?"
I know I have quoted my own post but by now I've not seen an answer to it.
Would be really nice if some of the ppl who know about the Wii U tech (Devs) could says if that is a possibillity.
Or if that even will give any advantage if used in the right way...
Thanks in advance!!
And another embarassing Wii U thread on the gaming side
Lawd forgive us!
not possible....
Wiiu just have enough power or room to house 2 gpus. You would have nothing left for CPU.
not possible....
Wiiu just have enough power or room to house 2 gpus. You would have nothing left for CPU.
Well that would depend on the complexity of each GPU. It'd be pointless though so I agree its not happening.
BTW why is everyone always saying WiiU is to small??
Analogue triggers would be nice addition but are hardly necessary. Same with multi-touch, which is even more unnecessary. The comments ive seen about Multitouch in particular are a little crazy and ridiculous, considering its inclusion would have absolutely zero to add to any game or anything else but would jack up the price of the entire console. I think some are confused into thinking it needs have all amenities of tablet completely forgetting that it is in fact a console controller that has buttons.
Because people have agendas
Was the GC that much weaker than the Xbox?
And the GC doesn't mean anything in this type of comparison because GPUs today are a different animal when it come sto heat
But the GC had the same "problems" when it came to space and heat as the Xbox, but Nintendo found another way round it that MS.
So the comparison is very valid, even if the problems are different.
But the GC had the same "problems" when it came to space and heat as the Xbox, but Nintendo found another way round it that MS.
So the comparison is very valid, even if the problems are different.
Who am I to stop people deluding themselves into thinking case volume has no relation to airflow and cooling of modern hardware? Hardware runs on magic and fairy dust after all.
Who am I to stop people deluding themselves into thinking case volume has no relation to airflow and cooling of modern hardware? Hardware runs on magic and fairy dust after all.
This has probably been discussed countless times, but how expensive are analogue triggers?
I would assume that since every PS360 controller has them, the price couldn't be that high. And (probably) with every next gen controller also having them, the price would drop even more. The only reasons I could come up with why they shouldn't put analogue triggers in it is the price, or even reducing the size of the controller.
No it isn't, engineering wise, they were completely different. Having the power supply built in, having an hdd & dvd drive contributed a lot to the space. Plus consoles gpu/cpu were were a lot different in 1999 compared to modern hardware today
There is only one person I see with an agenda here.
Case volume has an effect, certainly, but it's not the only thing that does.
Certainly it doesn't have much of an effect on airflow. You can have a case the size of a suitcase, but it would still run too hot if the vents weren't there, or even if they were there in but in the wrong place.
Someone a while back mentioned pressing another button for the "waggle" before, I guess like SMW with the separate spin jump button..
Right, but modern hardware has a tendency to heat up fast, and greater case volume is required to ensure adequately sized fans and good airflow keep your hardware cool.
As bg said, the original Xbox packed more in the case than the GCN did. It had a bigger disk drive, and internal. It had a HDD. The power brick was internal. Additionally, the Xbox had quite modern hardware for the time, producing a lot of heat.
Size matters, this is a fact, and there is no agenda.
Right, but modern hardware has a tendency to heat up fast, and greater case volume is required to ensure adequately sized fans and good airflow keep your hardware cool.
As bg said, the original Xbox packed more in the case than the GCN did. It had a bigger disk drive, and internal. It had a HDD. The power brick was internal. Additionally, the Xbox had quite modern hardware for the time, producing a lot of heat.
Size matters, this is a fact, and there is no agenda.
Whoa, it's BurnBurn. Congrats on making it in.
Thank you for proving my point.
But you're missing mine and maybe I'm not being clear enough. The GPU's raw power increase also lead to a huge increase in their heat/TDP. Just because 10 years ago GC was arguably able to keep up with Xbox despite it's size doesn't mean the same thing today because GPUs are hotter. If we took those same form factors and applied the power of today's GPUs with their heat. The GC would probably be able to handle a Cape Verde at best. Xbox would be able to handle a Pitcairn. That power gap is MUCH wider than it would be 10 years ago.
But you're missing mine and maybe I'm not being clear enough. The GPU's raw power increase also lead to a huge increase in their heat/TDP. Just because 10 years ago GC was arguably able to keep up with Xbox despite it's size doesn't mean the same thing today because GPUs are hotter. If we took those same form factors and applied the power of today's GPUs with their heat. The GC's case would probably be able to handle a Cape Verde at best. Xbox's case should be able to handle a Pitcairn. That power gap is MUCH wider than it would be 10 years ago.
See I'mI've been thinking about this a lot, and have finally come up with a solution, I think.
I won't be going digital-only, but since I do like to buy an additional sealed copy of my favorite games, I might go the "buy-digital-at-midnight + buy-sealed-physical-copy-later" route instead. (This would also ease my mind about wearing-out the disc drive's moving parts.)
For games/series that I like less, I'll go digital-only. In my eyes, physical media is big for preservation purposes.
Are all of you guys still buying the Wii U at launch?
But there are different ways to keep the system cool that putting it in a bigger case.
And as mentioned above, the WiiU is not going to have an internal psu, it's not going to have a HDD, etc, so the fact that it's smaller the the 360 has no bearing on anything at all.
And we don't even know if it's going to be small compared to the 720
Yeah but the Wii U is not that small when we compare it to the X360 as the Gc was compared to the Xbox!
And plus we don't know the ps4 and Durango sizes so...kind hard to tell he is small don't you think?
But those ways are also limited and can be expensive to a BoM. Both of us have a similar argument when it comes to Wii U (what's not on the inside), but my argument hasn't been that the case doesn't limit what Nintendo could put into it. It's that the case can handle more than what Nintendo allows. Beyond that there's only so much the case can handle and with the raw power vs heat of GPUs, the gap you saw 10 years ago when looking at form factor is not comparable to what you can see today. The pace of GPU heat grew too fast.
I've made the same argument for PS360 in that they could be better designed for cooling, which in turn would suggest they could handle more power as well.
But those ways are also limited and can be expensive to a BoM. Both of us have a similar argument when it comes to Wii U (what's not on the inside), but my argument hasn't been that the case doesn't limit what Nintendo could put into it. It's that the case can handle more than what Nintendo allows. Beyond that there's only so much the case can handle and with the raw power vs heat of GPUs, the gap you saw 10 years ago when looking at form factor is not comparable to what you can see today. The pace of GPU heat grew too fast.
I've made the same argument for PS360 in that they could be better designed for cooling, which in turn would suggest they could handle more power as well.
Wii U is small. Or better yet to make it clearer, its volume is small.
Yeah but compared to what?
Who am I to stop people deluding themselves into thinking case volume has no relation to airflow and cooling of modern hardware? Hardware runs on magic and fairy dust after all.
Compared to what I'd have liked to see Nintendo have in a next gen console. What I think a next gen console should look like wouldn't work in that case. And even that GPU on a 28nm process would push it too close for Wii U's case as is.
No, it won't release in September.
Consider this a new info/confirmation whatever.
Are all of you guys still buying the Wii U at launch?
But those ways are also limited and can be expensive to a BoM. Both of us have a similar argument when it comes to Wii U (what's not on the inside), but my argument hasn't been that the case doesn't limit what Nintendo could put into it. It's that the case can handle more than what Nintendo allows. Beyond that there's only so much the case can handle and with the raw power vs heat of GPUs, the gap you saw 10 years ago when looking at form factor is not comparable to what you can see today. The pace of GPU heat grew too fast.
I've made the same argument for PS360 in that they could be better designed for cooling, which in turn would suggest they could handle more power as well.
Wii U is small. Or better yet to make it clearer, its volume is small.