Sapiens
Member
Think about the last 4 generations of home console gaming (and to a lesser extent, those potent portables).
8-bit era: Nintendo, Sega and Atari. Atari and Sega doing very poorly. All major players (for their time).
16-bit: Nintendo, Sega and NEC/TTi. NEC failing in the US, MD doing poorly in jpn. Jaguar just totally sucking.
32-bit: Sony wins, Nintendo is merely O.K. and Sega eventually failing miserable (especially in the US).
Current gen: Sony, again, rules the coop, MS doing surprisingly well with XBOX. Nintendo living in their own world with GC and Sega DC....well, not to call it a miserable failure, but it failed miserably.
Will we have at least one loser this generation? I see potential reasons for all 3 new systems doing poorly:
Sony: Too late, too expensive? XBOX 360 takes the reigns?
360: Too early, too underpowered, people wait for PS3 like they did with PS2?
Revolution: Too gimmicky, classics dont translate well... hardcore ninfans lost and general public apathy?
Then again, I can see how all three can co-exist, mainly due to how different Rev is. If it takes off, and PS3 and 360 capture similar sized shares, the next gen bodes well for all three.
Should be really interesting to watch. I wish I had the average joe consumer conceptions of these machines. As it stands, I want all three and its hard for me to recognise faults. The pattern does dictate that we should have a loser amongst the big players though.
So, where would you put your money for failure?
Edit: the title.
8-bit era: Nintendo, Sega and Atari. Atari and Sega doing very poorly. All major players (for their time).
16-bit: Nintendo, Sega and NEC/TTi. NEC failing in the US, MD doing poorly in jpn. Jaguar just totally sucking.
32-bit: Sony wins, Nintendo is merely O.K. and Sega eventually failing miserable (especially in the US).
Current gen: Sony, again, rules the coop, MS doing surprisingly well with XBOX. Nintendo living in their own world with GC and Sega DC....well, not to call it a miserable failure, but it failed miserably.
Will we have at least one loser this generation? I see potential reasons for all 3 new systems doing poorly:
Sony: Too late, too expensive? XBOX 360 takes the reigns?
360: Too early, too underpowered, people wait for PS3 like they did with PS2?
Revolution: Too gimmicky, classics dont translate well... hardcore ninfans lost and general public apathy?
Then again, I can see how all three can co-exist, mainly due to how different Rev is. If it takes off, and PS3 and 360 capture similar sized shares, the next gen bodes well for all three.
Should be really interesting to watch. I wish I had the average joe consumer conceptions of these machines. As it stands, I want all three and its hard for me to recognise faults. The pattern does dictate that we should have a loser amongst the big players though.
So, where would you put your money for failure?
Edit: the title.