The W700 doesn't have a keyboard dock, though.
Its cradle doesn't have a keyboard?
The W700 doesn't have a keyboard dock, though.
It's just a stand with some extras, I think.Its cradle doesn't have a keyboard?
It's got a set of USB ports to plug a keyboard in, but the cradle itself isn't really portable at all.
It's got a set of USB ports to plug a keyboard in, but the cradle itself isn't really portable at all.
The surface has a huge battery though and will have a similar CPU and smaller screen.That w700 could be a nice tablet for school if Surface proves to be too costly or have a bad battery life.
The surface has a huge battery though and will have a similar CPU and smaller screen.
I doubt the surface will suffer in battery life compared to other ivy bridge tablets
Why not get a 10" Windows 8 tablet as well? I'd think that the software situation would be far better considering there's only one 10" Android tablet with Wacom at the moment. No?
I tried to hold off for a light art slate that has minimum requirement for my needs (Core i5/i7, 8GB of RAM, Wacom digitizer, better than SXGA res IPS LCD bigger than 11", swappable battery or min 8 hour of battery) and it looks like the closest one, the Sony VAIO Duo 11, doesn't use Wacom.
So I just bit the bullet on a really nice newegg Fujitsu T902 deal: $400 less than @ Fujitsu website.
You really can't beat a convertible for versatility. You have full voltage Core i5, 16GB max RAM, dual battery slots for hot swap action, And I have 13.3" surface area to draw on. A real desktop replacement for me. And doesn't weight that much (4.4 lbs). And love the fact that Fujitsu's Wacom pens have 2 buttons. 2 button pen that fits in the silo? Yes please.
Ordered it with 180GB Intel Cherryville SSD and 16GB of DDR3 1600 (CAS 10). Should be a speed demon with all my art apps.
I think I like my approach of having a 4.4 lbs 13.3" desktop replacement that can go along with me when I need it, along with a 1.3 lbs 10.1" Android tablet that I can carry about all the time, both running a Wacom pen. I'm set.
You really can't beat a convertible for versatility.
Could happen. The surface pro has a 42 which battery and should do better than ultra books of the same size. I think 8 hours for surfing the web or in office will happenI just want it to last ~8 hours of classroom use and cost ~1k.
I think this is up for debate; I consider the transformers to be more versatile.
The Transformer form factor is mature (can't think of any other way to call it). In the old day it can't be done because neither the cpu nor the OS was ready.
Now both of them are ready. I expect them completely replace the netbook and small laptop market.
Detachable slate/keyboard form factor w trapped batteries is mature for ARM devices because of their very low TDP, but not quite there for Intel Core devices. You need vents and get very low battery life under load (4 hours ish).
I wouldn't mind such form factor if they made the slate a little bigger (2.5 lbs and a bit thicker) if you get SODIMM slots and swappable battery.
With Intel CPUs, you'll have to settle for Atom for such form factor to get decent battery life, but then with their 32bit architecture, OEMs solder on only 2GB of RAM. And the CPU is still In Order, so sometime it hangs for ages. It's fucking annoying...
Will be really interesting when these devices start hitting reviewers, the Atom devices have a lot of questions to answer on power, and on the i3/5/7s we need to know how hot/loud they get and how long their batteries last.
On the i3/5/7 devices I think heat and fan noise will have a big part to play in figuring out what the best design solution is. That and whether or not the transformer mechanisms are durable enough.
Asus is the company that manufactured the MacBook & iBook for Apple, created the Eee netbooks, and popularized the Transformer convertible that everyone is now copying.
I disagree. Right now mobile Atom chips (medfield) are ready. They are in phones and they are not particularly power hunger. In fact I am pretty sure Motorola will announce an intel Android phone in 2 weeks for the US market.
There is another advantage the Atom mobile chip has over the ARM soc, intel's superior fabbing technology.
I see no reason why a medfield intel 10" tablet couldn't be as power efficient as a 10" arm tablet. Intel tablets can dualboot Windows and Android too.
In fact I don't know see why people want to use i5 to run on mobile devices. If you can't run a particular program on 5 watt atom chip, you should slim down your software until it runs; not putting a 20 watt chip in it to brute force the problem. That's so wrong on so many levels.
Intel wants sell more expensive i series chips, so they came up with a "ultrabook" scheme and Microsoft is hilariously buying into it. Going by the ultrabook sales number the general public know whats up.
I've been toying around in the IFA with most if not all convertible tablets and they are giving me a somewhat ugly vibe. Cheap plastics and uneven quality materials ahoy, plus shoddy keyboards and terrible (and I mean terrible) latching mechanisms that require way more effort from the user than they really should.
There are some exceptions like the ones from ASUS (both of them are pretty damn solid, even if the release mechanism is a bit crud) and a few others I can't really talk about, but so far they feel low budget-ish. Noticiably above the utter crap that were the first generation of netbooks, but slightly below the earliest ultrabooks. On the plus side, all of them are REALLY snappy, from the RT versions to the x86 ones, Atoms included. Seeing Windows 8 flying on an ARM device is something else.
Also, the U500 is the bomb, yo. Feels and looks like a real fucking winner.
If anybody has questions I'll be glad to answer them to some extent (before somebody claims I'm a bullshitter, mods can check that I've been in Berlin these days by looking at my IP history).
I was told that most units were basically production-ready samples with final materials and I believe it. I mean, Windows 8's launch is around the corner, surely production has already started somewhere.Thanks for the report. Don't forget that those are still pre-production models, so the build quality is not necessarily representative for the consumer versions.
ASUS's 15-inch ultrabook with optional discrete graphics. Really sweet machine. On the tactile side, HP also had a new 15-inch ENVY ultrabook with a 1080p IPS touch screeen that looked like a million bucks, although being an ENVY I expect something really pricey.What is the U500?
I was told that most units were basically production-ready samples with final materials and I believe it. I mean, Windows 8's launch is around the corner, surely production has already started somewhere.
ASUS's 15-inch ultrabook with optional discrete graphics. Really sweet machine. On the tactile side, HP also had a new 15-inch ENVY ultrabook with a 1080p IPS touch screeen that looked like a million bucks, although being an ENVY I expect something really pricey.
Did you see the Series 9 with the insane resolution? How was Windows 8 in it, I mean, did it scaled well or everything was really small?
I've been toying around in the IFA with most if not all convertible tablets and they are giving me a somewhat ugly vibe. Cheap plastics and uneven quality materials ahoy, plus shoddy keyboards and terrible (and I mean terrible) latching mechanisms that require way more effort from the user than they really should.
There are some exceptions like the ones from ASUS (both of them are pretty damn solid, even if the release mechanism is a bit crud) and a few others I can't really talk about, but so far they feel low budget-ish. Noticiably above the utter crap that were the first generation of netbooks, but slightly below the earliest ultrabooks. On the plus side, all of them are REALLY snappy, from the RT versions to the x86 ones, Atoms included. Seeing Windows 8 flying on an ARM device is something else.
Also, the U500 is the bomb, yo. Feels and looks like a real fucking winner.
If anybody has questions I'll be glad to answer them to some extent (before somebody claims I'm a bullshitter, mods can check that I've been in Berlin these days by looking at my IP history).
Did they had any 3d somewhat intensive game running on those atom tablets? I'm really curious about how they are going to perform...I've been toying around in the IFA with most if not all convertible tablets and they are giving me a somewhat ugly vibe. Cheap plastics and uneven quality materials ahoy, plus shoddy keyboards and terrible (and I mean terrible) latching mechanisms that require way more effort from the user than they really should.
There are some exceptions like the ones from ASUS (both of them are pretty damn solid, even if the release mechanism is a bit crud) and a few others I can't really talk about, but so far they feel low budget-ish. Noticiably above the utter crap that were the first generation of netbooks, but slightly below the earliest ultrabooks. On the plus side, all of them are REALLY snappy, from the RT versions to the x86 ones, Atoms included. Seeing Windows 8 flying on an ARM device is something else.
Also, the U500 is the bomb, yo. Feels and looks like a real fucking winner.
If anybody has questions I'll be glad to answer them to some extent (before somebody claims I'm a bullshitter, mods can check that I've been in Berlin these days by looking at my IP history).
It felt great, quite probably one of the best ones. It also looks like the most business minded of the group, definitely not a toy.did you test out the Sony Vaio Duo 11? If so, what was your impression with that?
ASUS and Sony. Oddly enough I didn't like Samsung very much. Still, for those not looking for a tablet-thing nor concerned about the size, HP's Spectre XT TouchSmart Ultrabook is some real hot stuff.Just curious but which of the tablets seemed to have the best build quality... From the total package perspective. I am more than likely going to get a surface anyways but would be curious which one to be looking at in comparison from the ones shown there.
Most manufacturers were incredibly skittish about showing anything besides Microsoft apps, but ASUS had some decent looking dungeon crawler (just don't ask me for names) and it ran silky smooth on its Vivo Tab RT.Did they had any 3d somewhat intensive game running on those atom tablets? I'm really curious about how they are going to perform...
Reading some Acer Aspire S7 impressions, man this thing sure looks like high quality.. form Acer..
Most manufacturers were incredibly skittish about showing anything besides Microsoft apps, but ASUS had some decent looking dungeon crawler (just don't ask me for names) and it ran silky smooth on its Vivo Tab RT.
Did Asus showed this same game on their vivo tab (the non RT version)?
Atoms tablets are bassicaly netbooks without KB. But higher end tablets will be bassicaly using ultrabook parts, so there's no reason to assume they will be weak or have bad battery life
Not that I know of, but it is not like I camped there
Some dude (I think it was some ASUS staffer, but I'm not sure) gave it a brief run while the rest of us hovered around.
I've been toying around in the IFA with most if not all convertible tablets and they are giving me a somewhat ugly vibe. Cheap plastics and uneven quality materials ahoy, plus shoddy keyboards and terrible (and I mean terrible) latching mechanisms that require way more effort from the user than they really should.
Also, the U500 is the bomb, yo. Feels and looks like a real fucking winner.
Reading some Acer Aspire S7 impressions, man this thing sure looks like high quality.. form Acer..
What i'm curious is to see if the atom tablets can actually compare to the RT devices in performance, if they perform close enough i'm thinking about getting one due the stylus support...
Atom's get a bad rap. I used to have a hp311 with a 1.6ghz atom and it was really bad. However that was 3 years ago now .
I have a brazos 1.6 dual core in my media server and it runs windows and alot of programs just fine. I see now reason why a late 2012 atom wouldn't offer similar or better performance.
In a tablet it should be just fine.
Have you tried the HP Envy X2? I watched an 11 minute video of it somewhere and the latching mechanism seemed pretty great. Seemed easy to remove the tablet and inserting it was somehow helped by magnets.
Edit: I asked a couple of companies about cradles and they told me that they had no interest in them at the moment.
My preliminary tablet recommendations to everyone depending upon what you're looking for:
Low-cost iPad replacement w/ MS Office: Surface RT
iPad replacement w/ legacy app support: HP Envy X2
Gamer/Power-user: Asus Transformer Book
Ultrabook replacement: Asus Taichi
I'm contemplating the Samsung route (with Samsung Ativ S and Samsung Ativ Atom Smart PC) or the Asus/Nokia Route (Nokia WP8 phone with ASUS Vivo Atom.)
Will the Atom be able to do what a standard laptop does? I'm spec-illiterate, so that's why I'm asking.
Oh damn RT takes a lot longer.Well according to this video the boot-up time on the atom was better then the RT.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPVct0jAAKs
I know that doesn't directly pertain to overall performance, but at least it bodes well.
Oh damn RT takes a lot longer.
EDIT:
Also, some new pictures of the IdeaPad Yoga from IFA: ideapad yoga 13
It's actually one of the form factors I find most interesting. I'd have to hold one to see how acceptable it is to have the keyboard on the back, but at least you get a full, capable notebook with the tablet.
Hope we'll get the full specs and prices soon.