• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wkd BO 0407-0917 - Baby & the Beast still Going In Style, auds con. to Ghost ScarJo

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can just start at 4 or 5 and get the gist of things if you want to follow the more recent superhero soap opera take on the franchise.

This is true.

People like to shit on 4 but that film is the one that actually rebooted the series so that Fast Five could happen.

I really liked the race between Brian and Torotto a lot. It was a lot of fun and a great throwback to FF1.

"Re-routing..." and "Still the bustah..."
 

border

Member
I do not get why the sequel to Trainspotting is being rolled out like a low-key A24 acquisition.

The owner of our local independent theatre posted on their Facebook that they practically had to beg to show the movie, and that everyone interested should please come out this weekend since they need to prove that they can open these limited release films earlier.

I thought it was maybe not the best idea to stake their reputation on a sequel to a 20 year old cult favorite, but the neighborhood is hip enough that maybe it'll work out.
 

Pachimari

Member
If he doesn't get punched in the face the second they're good I'll be salty



lol he fuckin' died in Tokyo Drift

There's some real weird continuity shit with that & F&F

Um...that happens in the 3rd one, my friend.

Are you watching them out of order or sumshiet?
Oh yeah, Tokyo Drift happens after F&F4.

I'm watching them in order. I started last year with F&F1 and went from there. But it has been a few months since I watched Fast Five.
 
Baffling opinion of Kong considering Gareth Edwards' anemic Godzilla kicked off the universe.

It's not baffling at all. Kong is a fucking terribly made movie. Sure it's louder and has more action, but none of it fucking means anything. Not that these movies have to be meaningful in a larger sense, but the shit that happens in them should actually carry some sort of weight.

It's basically just Vogt-Roberts running around the theater with a binder full of concept art and riffling through it like a flipbook while excitedly shouting "AND THEN THIS, & THIS OH LOOK A SUNSET"

Edwards' Godzilla is flat at times, and likes to tease moments more than pay them off, but it also contains weight, and its scale actually makes an impression beyond "oh, what a pretty postcard." And when it does pay those moments off, it pays them off. Vogt-Roberts spends a whole lot of time building set-pieces that end with nonsensical VFX farting (e.g. Shea Whigham)
 
Scarlet Witch and Quiksilver's subplot massively dragged that film down for me.

Could have done with less of that schlock and more of the actual monster whose name is in the title.
 

kswiston

Member
I guess this is the weekend where people stop questioning whether Beauty and the Beast will make it to $1B :p


A couple of weeks ago, I made a graph comparing BatB's worldwide run to other films that ended up in the $1.05-1.35B range. Here's an update:

gQns3dr.png


Keep in mind that BatB still has Japan to open in. Finishing somewhere above Civil War is likely.

EDIT: For films that had advanced overseas openings, "week 1" is the film's international total as of the Sunday before the domestic opening.

EDIT2: the last data point is the eventual WW total. Some of these films took a long time to hit their WW totals. Others got there quickly.
 
It's not baffling at all. Kong is a fucking terribly made movie. Sure it's louder and has more action, but none of it fucking means anything. Not that these movies have to be meaningful in a larger sense, but the shit that happens in them should actually carry some sort of weight.

It's basically just Vogt-Roberts running around the theater with a binder full of concept art and riffling through it like a flipbook while excitedly shouting "AND THEN THIS, & THIS OH LOOK A SUNSET"

Edwards' Godzilla is flat at times, and likes to tease moments more than pay them off, but it also contains weight, and its scale actually makes an impression beyond "oh, what a pretty postcard." And when it does pay those moments off, it pays them off. Vogt-Roberts spends a whole lot of time building set-pieces that end with nonsensical VFX farting (e.g. Shea Wigham)

So, what Gareth Edwards did with Godzilla.

I'm not even big on Kong but at least it has things like characters with personalities. I'll give him that the atomic breath scenes are better than Kong's monster battles.
 
Didn't help in Godzilla that
they killed their best actor and character

Didn't help it in Kong, either. It probably would have hurt Kong more than it did Godzilla if anyone in Kong even halfway resembled a character

(Whigham & Reilly aside)

So, what Gareth Edwards did with Godzilla.

Not at all. There are cool images in Edwards film, and he lets those images sit there. He legitimately establishes an atmosphere, even if he doesn't really do much with it half the time.

Vogt-Roberts isn't even establishing atmosphere. Hell, there's not much establishment, period. He sucks at geography. Hence the flipbook comment. Comic-book imagery is just rattling by at full clip and he's hoping you'll be "oh, cool" as much as he is.
 

shintoki

sparkle this bitch
This is true.

People like to shit on 4 but that film is the one that actually rebooted the series so that Fast Five could happen.

I really liked the race between Brian and Torotto a lot. It was a lot of fun and a great throwback to FF1.

"Re-routing..." and "Still the bustah..."

While it rebooted the franchise, it also felt like the most lifeless one. It was great to see the cast back really.
 

kswiston

Member
Dat Frozen late spike is kinda of insane.

Did it have a ton of OS markets that it hit long after the phenomenon started, K-Swizz?

Frozen had a staggered worldwide launch that took months to finish rolling out. Japan was in March I think. It was #1 there forever.

EDIT: The domestic run was unusual as well. Frozen was at $192M after 4 weekends, and ended up breaking $400M.
 
While it rebooted the franchise, it also felt like the most lifeless one. It was great to see the cast back really.

I think it was because it was the movie that had the worst villain.Braga was complete trash and had no charisma. Even Cole Hauser in 2Fast was better.
 

kswiston

Member
I wonder if that matches up with when "Let it Go" started to seriously take off as a single.

I think so. Also, that was around the start of the December holidays.

It was $192M after 4 weekends though. I forgot to skip the first weekend when it released in a single theatre (for a $243k weekend total).
 
I vaguely remember sing-a-long screenings starting up somewhere in there as well. January-February ish? Might be remembering that wrong, though.
 
They tried that for Moana, but the worldwide total was less than just Domestic + Japan for Frozen.

The craziest part of 'Let It Go' was, it made Idina Menzel (a traditionally Broadway actress) into a household name. That kinda shit didn't happen to Paige O'Hara or Jodi Bensen, like at all.
 
Didn't help it in Kong, either. It probably would have hurt Kong more than it did Godzilla if anyone in Kong even halfway resembled a character

(Whigham & Reilly aside)



Not at all. There are cool images in Edwards film, and he lets those images sit there. He legitimately establishes an atmosphere, even if he doesn't really do much with it half the time.

Vogt-Roberts isn't even establishing atmosphere. Hell, there's not much establishment, period. He sucks at geography. Hence the flipbook comment. Comic-book imagery is just rattling by at full clip and he's hoping you'll be "oh, cool" as much as he is.

I mean, Edwards literally concocts more and more ludicrous reasons for Aaron Taylor-Johnson's character to encounter and survive monsters. Big difference between the two is Vogt-Roberts embellishes in it while Edwards is self-serious. But if someone asked me who between them I'd want directing the crossover, my answer would be "can it be neither?"
 

caliph95

Member
I mean, Edwards literally concocts more and more ludicrous reasons for Aaron Taylor-Johnson's character to encounter and survive monsters. Big difference between the two is Vogt-Roberts embellishes in it while Edwards is self-serious. But if someone asked me who between them I'd want directing the crossover, my answer would be "can it be neither?"
Truly it should be Colin Trevorrow
 
Big difference between the two is Vogt-Roberts embellishes in it while Edwards is self-serious.

I don't think his "embellishing in it" is the real difference. Of course the situations are going to be contrived to some degree - that's just a monster movie given. The difference is in the staging of how the encounters go. Edwards isn't self-serious about how those scenarios are staged, he's concerned in the set-piece playing out convincingly

Vogt-Roberts doesn't give a shit how his sequences play out so long as the moments he wants highlighted get captured.

You know that video about Moments vs. Scenes that Nerdwriter did about Batman v. Superman? It applies even moreso to Kong: Skull Island. There are no scenes in that movie. Fuckin' none. It's all just moments.

Anyway, depending on how Dougherty does with Godzilla II, it'll probably be his if he wants it.
 
I don't think his "embellishing in it" is the real difference. Of course the situations are going to be contrived to some degree - that's just a monster movie given. The difference is in the staging of how the encounters go. Edwards isn't self-serious about how those scenarios are staged, he's concerned in the set-piece playing out convincingly

Vogt-Roberts doesn't give a shit how his sequences play out so long as the moments he wants highlighted get captured.

You know that video about Moments vs. Scenes that Nerdwriter did about Batman v. Superman? It applies even moreso to Kong: Skull Island. There are no scenes in that movie. Fuckin' none. It's all just moments.

Anyway, depending on how Dougherty does with Godzilla II, it'll probably be his if he wants it.

We'll just keep going in a circle here because I find myself nodding with your take on Vogt-Robert if applied to Edwards.

Truly it should be Colin Trevorrow

Only if it overlaps with Star Wars 9.
 
Really happy to see Your Name posting such solid numbers. Doing over 5k per theater makes a decent expansion either next week or tge one after more likely as well.

Great movie if you haven't seen it yet btw.
 

kswiston

Member
I feel like we have generally overpredicted the major MCU films post Iron Man 3. Partially because foreign exchanges have been poor since 2015, and partially because the franchise has so much hype here and in other online communities.

I am going to say around $375M domestic, and in the neighbourhood of BvS Worldwide, for GotG 2.
 

Pachimari

Member
I feel like we have generally overpredicted the major MCU films post Iron Man 3. Partially because foreign exchanges have been poor since 2015, and partially because the franchise has so much hype here and in other online communities.

I am going to say around $375M domestic, and in the neighbourhood of BvS Worldwide, for GotG 2.
GotG2 is gonna break the billion dollar mark ww.

I can't remember, was Braga the villain of F4 or F5?
 
I feel like we have generally overpredicted the major MCU films post Iron Man 3. Partially because foreign exchanges have been poor since 2015, and partially because the franchise has so much hype here and in other online communities.

I am going to say around $375M domestic, and in the neighbourhood of BvS Worldwide, for GotG 2.

I feel like these billion dollar predictions are gonna be closer to the mark this time partially because it's Guardians, whose estimation has only grown in the meantime, and its stance as being part of—but largely set outside—the Marvel continuity porn going on in the main flights 'n' tights series will help.

I think that'll also help Ragnarok. They'll basically get sold as being all the fun of the Marvel series without any of the angst/continuity that comes along with it. You get to have it all in one concise 2hr package.
 

kswiston

Member
Guardians had the biggest domestic share of all of the Phase 2-3 MCU films, and that was back when foreign exchange was good. The first film would have made $680M at current rates.
 
Guardians look to be the first big movie after F8 hits, April is fairly slim otherwise.

Then Guardians is fairly safe until Alien: Covenant, unless we think Guy Ritchie's King Arthur movie will be big.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom