What's with people putting words in my mouth in this thread? I didn't say Dunkirk only beat Valerian because of its director. Valerian had fundamental issues and Dunkirk did not.
Also, Dunkirk was funded by Warner Bros. (an American production company) and Nolan is not just British anyway, he's British-American.
You are the one who tied the performance to Valerian being French and Dunkrik being American, and due to how well know the directors are. Not sure how I'm putting any words in your mouth. I just dispute that, regardless of if you think you said that or not.
Dunkrik, directed by a Brit, written by a Brit, acted by Brits. Also literally about British people and the British war effort. A bit odd to insist its not British, imo. No shame in a French movie being annihilated by a British one.
Financed? Valerian was financed by entities from all over the world like many movies, treated as an international investment vehicle, which contradicts you calling it a French movie if financing is what determines a where a movie comes from. Would mean the movie is international, which would contradict your point.
When the BBC finances American things that makes it British? Lol, no. Is Orphan Black British because its British money? No.