Mmmh wonder if Dr. Doom could work with these guys?They got "kinda Mole Man" at the end of their movie
Fox still seems pretty confident about going forward with Fant4stic 2.
This could just be false bravado, as there's nothing to be positive about in terms of the F4's future in Fox's hands given these box office numbers.
Wasn't that the original vibe that the 2005 film was supposed to have when Peyton Reed was attached to it? I thought I remember hearing about him wanting to make it set in the 60s.Slashfilm guys were talking about how F4 could work as a retro film - say a film set in the 70s.
I'd dig it. Actually, no, it would still bomb because this is the lamest group of superheroes on the planet.
The Incredibles was Fantastic Four done better.
Exactly, & we all know how that turned out. I'm going with false bravado for now.Sony said similar things right after ASM2 came out if I remember right.
Wasn't that the original vibe that the 2005 film was supposed to have when Peyton Reed was attached to it? I thought I remember hearing about him wanting to make it set in the 60s.
Yup. Fox's initial attempt at the property was getting the guy who just made them some money on "Down With Love" to apply that same aesthetic to Fantastic Four. I don't remember why it fell apart though. Might have been cost.
Yup. Fox's initial attempt at the property was getting the guy who just made them some money on "Down With Love" to apply that same aesthetic to Fantastic Four. I don't remember why it fell apart though. Might have been cost.
Exactly, & we all know how that turned out. I'm going with false bravado for now.
When was the last time you heard a movie studio say "we fucked up, and we know we fucked up"? Especially this close to release, it'll kill whatever tiny legs the movie might actually have.
LOL didn't Trank kinda already say that, though?
Could FF be the biggest superhero movie bomb ever? I mean it has everything going against it.
Catwoman production cost 100m and opened to less than $17m back in 2004.
Catwoman production cost 100m and opened to less than $17m back in 2004.
The real winner of the weekend is The Gift; it was tracking at half of what it made with a solid chance of making under 5M this weekend. Great reviews managed to triumph over the poor tracking and abysmal marketing. Excellent start for STX; no one would've guessed The Gift domestically would make more than Fantastic Four opening weekend.
Welp Trank isn't going to work for a major studio ever again.
I thought the production cost of FF was 122m. That would put it close, right?Catwoman production cost 100m and opened to less than $17m back in 2004.
Haha, but Trank's gone rouge for a while now and can't be counted as part of "the studio." In fact, he's tweet probably sank the movie even more.
It really did turn out to be a perfect storm for the movie. With $60M worldwide this week and horrible word of mouth in every country, there's a real possibility it won't even cross the $100 million mark ever.
So do you guys think Ant-Man will make it to 400mil?
Exactly, & we all know how that turned out. I'm going with false bravado for now.
Sony said similar things right after ASM2 came out if I remember right.
Someone was walking out the door with 75 million in their pocket. It certainly wasnt on the screen.
Basketball scene required extra time and money in the editing room.
I admit I'm not massively into conics but no one seems to be talking about fox keeping the FF rights for the next few years so they can use the villains in the X men movies. Would they not really fit in that universe?
I admit I'm not massively into conics but no one seems to be talking about fox keeping the FF rights for the next few years so they can use the villains in the X men movies. Would they not really fit in that universe?
They could but I think to keep the rights they still have to make a FF movie. Seems like a lot of work when there's so many xmen villains.I admit I'm not massively into conics but no one seems to be talking about fox keeping the FF rights for the next few years so they can use the villains in the X men movies. Would they not really fit in that universe?
Probably cost and that Down With Love wasn't a huge hit either. Even if the budget was low, it only made $20m domestic.
Shaun the Sheep is, imho, a classic. Check it out if you have not already
Fox doesn't own animated rights as far as I'm aware.That tweet is gonna haunt Trank for a hot minute.
Edit: is there any reason Fox couldn't try an animated stab at the franchise? I mean Big Hero 6 and Incredibles have shown that families will eat it up, and you don't have to worry about "grounding" anything.
Worldwide Updates:
Fantastic Four - $60M
Terminator Genisys - $322M
Mission Impossible: rogue Nation - $265M
Pixels - $131M
Jurassic World - $1.581B
Minions - $913M
Inside Out - $635M
Ant-Man - $326M
Fantastic Four will be the first Marvel/DC failure since the Avengers launched.
How good/bad is this?
please be bad
So do you guys think Ant-Man will make it to 400mil?
I admit I'm not massively into conics but no one seems to be talking about fox keeping the FF rights for the next few years so they can use the villains in the X men movies. Would they not really fit in that universe?
Sony isn't FOX
Sony is... probably the absolute worst major movie company. It doesn't hurt as an overhead that the entire company was bleeding money and probably would have taken any life-raft they could get
The real winner of the weekend is The Gift; it was tracking at half of what it made with a solid chance of making under 5M this weekend. Great reviews managed to triumph over the poor tracking and abysmal marketing. Excellent start for STX; no one would've guessed The Gift domestically would make more than Fantastic Four opening weekend.
And even then, Sony didn't actually sell the rights. They basically just agreed to a cross-licensing deal (Marvel can use Spider-Man characters in Avengers, and Sony if they'd like to can use Marvel characters) with the added bonus of having Feige as a producer. Sony's still paying for the production of the new Spider-Man movie, and conversely gets to keep the profits (I don't think Marvel actually gets any money as part of the deal).
Which is why I continue to believe that Fox is not going to out-and-out sell the Fantastic Four rights. If Sony didn't agree to that deal when they needed money, why would Fox agree to it when they don't?
Because they want something that Marvel has.
And even then, Sony didn't actually sell the rights. They basically just agreed to a cross-licensing deal (Marvel can use Spider-Man characters in Avengers, and Sony if they'd like to can use Marvel characters) with the added bonus of having Feige as a producer. Sony's still paying for the production of the new Spider-Man movie, and conversely gets to keep the profits (I don't think Marvel actually gets any money as part of the deal).
Which is why I continue to believe that Fox is not going to out-and-out sell the Fantastic Four rights. If Sony didn't agree to that deal when they needed money, why would Fox agree to it when they don't?
I want to know what say Marvel has in the new Spider-Man movie.
I want to know what say Marvel has in the new Spider-Man movie. They've watched Sony run it into the ground twice now, without Marvel having some input I don't get what is supposed to be different this time. Or do they just hope that even if the stand-alone Sony stuff is shit, people will still be excited when he's in Marvel produced stuff?