demosthenes
Member
I need to see sicario this week. Looks amazing.
You do, was amazing.
I need to see sicario this week. Looks amazing.
Somewhere Disney is seething and punching orphans in response to the Martians debut.
Interstellar and Europa Report.I am very happy the Martian is doing well. How long has it been since we had such an earnestly pro-science pro-exploration movie?
The Martian is just really damn likable. Just enough drama to sustain 130 minutes, light enough for mass appeal, big cast of great A-list actors to fill the characters out, with an assured visual sense from Ridley Scott. You walk out of it feeling good, you tell people, "Oh yeah, the Martian! That was a good one". The definition of a crowd-pleaser.
Should hold up really well over the rest of the month.
Budget for Hotel Transylvania 2?
Budget for Hotel Transylvania 2?
- Movie and television studio Lions Gate Entertainment Corp is in advanced talks to merge with John Malone's premium TV cable network Starz, the Los Angeles Times reported, citing sources.
He's working on his original movie Can You Imagine? He's had a deal to develop it with Sony and been doing that on the side while the Hotel Transylvania series and the Popeye attempt happened, so now his primary focus is on getting that greenlit. Hopefully Sony rewards him with a go for production and faithful backing, but who knows.Hope Genndy comes up with a more interesting animation next time. I don't want him stuck on sequels even if I really liked the first Hotel Transylvania cause his signature style was present in it.
Pan's Thursday previews take was $650k. Jupiter Ascending made $1M during its previews.
Boxoffice.com is predicting $16.5M for Pan this weekend.
I'm still trying to figure out who Pan was even for. Its too dark and self-serious for kids, too loud and garish for adults. Its a origin story nobody asked for. Its a narrative that takes place before the fun shit happens.
why
Pan was doomed since they had jackman in that ridiculous getup.
I'm still trying to figure out who Pan was even for. Its too dark and self-serious for kids, too loud and garish for adults. Its a origin story nobody asked for. Its a narrative that takes place before the fun shit happens.
why
No clue why this ever even happened. Nobody gives a fuck about Peter Pan.
But watch, Disney will make money off of Tinkerbell.
So this year has seen 3 major ($70M+ budget) bombs for WB, 2 for Universal, 1 for Disney (maybe 2 depending on what Strange Magic cost), and 1 for Fox.
I don't know that Strange Magic would "count" though? I thought I heard that the film was largely finished pre-sale to Disney, and Disney didn't really put much money into finishing/releasing it once they had it.
They are pretty much the only ones having success with the live action fairy tale/children's story stuff recently.
Didn't Universal make cash over Snow White?
Also, Universal didn't have any financial participation in Legendary's projects - they were solely distributors - Legendary assumed the costs.
But I get your point kwiston
I'm still trying to figure out who Pan was even for. Its too dark and self-serious for kids, too loud and garish for adults. Its a origin story nobody asked for. Its a narrative that takes place before the fun shit happens.
why
Blackhat did so poorly that there is no way they didn't lose money just off distribution. Seventh Son probably lost money on distribution at least domestically as well. But obviously that is a better place to be in than having Tomorrowland or Pan on your ledger.
I'm surprised Disney didn't take a writedown for Tomorrowland - it's failure is equivalent to John Carter.
But watch, Disney will make money off of Tinkerbell.
So this year has seen 3 major ($70M+ budget) bombs for WB, 2 for Universal, 1 for Disney (maybe 2 depending on what Strange Magic cost), and 1 for Fox.
There's also Pixels.
No clue why this ever even happened. Nobody gives a fuck about Peter Pan.