StealthGoblin
Banned
Why isn't the theory of everything being played in every cinema and being beamed into space?
It does feel like they've drained the talent from Pixar though, not sure if there is the pool of people available for both of them to be firing on all cylinders.
Gravity will end up making more money on a much smaller budget. Cool.
Well, I'm not sure we can say that $500M WW as a lock as not doing well. I think it will finish sub $600M though.Glad interstellar isnt doing well. The movie was not good. Hopefully Nolan will refocus and continue to be amazing.
I wonder how will this experiment of Paramount handling domestic and WB handling worldwide distribution pan out for those two companies. And who has video and TV rights?
Interstellar is trash, I've made sure to let all my friends know. Awful movie. Glad to see it sinking.
lol Iooking at this thread we need a name for those who hate Nolan and his movies like the opposte of nolanites because everyone can see this in this thread
What do we call them
There hasn't been a mass exodus from Pixar to Disney Animation. Disney just needed to be re-organized so the talent there could start making good movies again and John Lasseter was able to do that.It does feel like they've drained the talent from Pixar though, not sure if there is the pool of people available for both of them to be firing on all cylinders.
It's not really sinking though. $500M+ on a $160M budget is a success story.
That's not true. It's one of the most entertaining movies I've ever had the pleasure of seeing in a theater.Interstellar is trash, I've made sure to let all my friends know. Awful movie. Glad to see it sinking.
Interstellar wasn't good. People saying that it's the successor to 2001: A Space Odyssey are nuts.
Nolan has so many people salty. I understand not liking the movie, but calling it trash and calling Nolan a fraud? lol. where's the hate hard tag when you need it. It would be more interesting if you put thoughts and arguments behind these vacuous posts instead.
Also the movie is successfull already. Thus, stop polluting the thread with innane crap.
I think a lot of the hate comes from people putting Nolan on such a high pedestal. We had reports of people crying at the end of TDKR, we have people calling Interstellar this generation's 2001: A Space Odyssey, we had pretentious articles leading up to the release of Interstellar talking about how great of a person Nolan is and how unique he is as a director. It gets tiresome, so people have much less tolerance or issues in his movies. Not saying it's right, but that's at least partially why.
Referring to a 39% second week drop as "sinking" is one of the worst analyses I've seen in these threads.
Interstellar wasn't good. People saying that it's the successor to 2001: A Space Odyssey are nuts.
Interstellar is probably going to close in the high 500m worldwide. That's good but you can bet the movie was expected to do more.
Interstellar is trash, I've made sure to let all my friends know. Awful movie. Glad to see it sinking.
Reminds me of Peter Jackson's King Kong's situation, although that one was more expensive.
Is anyone so happy to see Disney make such a big comeback like the 90's?
Interstellar is probably going to close in the high 500m worldwide. That's good but you can bet the movie was expected to do more.
Reminds me of Peter Jackson's King Kong's situation, although that one was more expensive.
ITT: I learned that salt had reached interstellar levels.
I'm not sure if "Heaven's Gate Syndrome" applies yet to Nolan. I found Intersteller bad, but nowhere near as bad as Jackson's King Kong or the SW prequels, so maybe he'll be humbled before he flies off the reigns too much.
As an example of Cimino's fanatical attention to detail, a street built to his precise specifications had to be torn down and rebuilt because it reportedly "didn't look right'. The street in question needed to be six feet wider; the set construction boss said it would be cheaper to tear down one side and move it back six feet, but Cimino insisted that both sides be dismantled and moved back three feet, then reassembled.
In yet another egregious example, Cimino had an irrigation system built under the land where the major battlefield scene would unfold, so that it would remain vividly green, to contrast with the red color it would later be awash with after the bloody carnage.
Heaven's Gate sure is a fun film to talk about. Maybe I'll actually watch it one day!
Glad interstellar isnt doing well. The movie was not good. Hopefully Nolan will refocus and continue to be amazing.
For better or for worse, Nolan is too budget-conscious to ever fall into the same trap as Michael Cimino did. Nolan doesn't strike as the type that would do something like this:
Or this:
Or in another example that was presented in a book-only interview with Tom Noonan about the film, Cimino had ordered an entire house to be built on the set, which was then detonated with dynamite. This wasn't for a scene that was planned for the film: he just wanted to see what it would look like on film.
Heaven's Gate sure is a fun film to talk about. Maybe I'll actually watch it one day!
Michael Ciamino killed his career turning a $7 million movie into a $40 million boring slow paced extravaganza that was loved by european audiences, Nolan made a $176 million slow paced, boring at times extavaganza that is loved/hated by pretty much all audiences.I'm not sure if "Heaven's Gate Syndrome" applies yet to Nolan. I found Intersteller bad, but nowhere near as bad as Jackson's King Kong or the SW prequels, so maybe he'll be humbled before he flies off the reigns too much.
It's a letdown only in the sense that Inception made $825M WW.I don't think studios can really view Interstellar's overseas performance as disappointing. It should wind up finishing with a similar overseas total as Gravity without the benefit of 3D. No doubt they were hoping for a better domestic take though.
Also, it's not like a director whose last 4 films have all exceeded 500M worldwide (across 3 unrelated properties no less) will suddenly find himself hurting for funding.
So Beyond the Lights is actually GOOD?
Didn't expect that. Trailers made it look so...not good? lol
Interstellar wasn't good. People saying that it's the successor to 2001: A Space Odyssey are nuts.
Wait, people are actually saying that? Man...
Is anyone so happy to see Disney make such a big comeback like the 90's?
Yeah, it'd have been AMAZING to get this kind of comeback with hand drawn animation, but as is it's kind of bittersweet.I can't care as much back then with their shift to 3DCG
Yeah. I feel like that's been turned into ammunition. Stupid comparison to begin with.I think people were only saying that before the movie actually released. Good or bad, it holds very little in common with 2001.
Yeah. Agreed. People tend to overstate this, the movies have been "good", but I'm not sure any of them have been great (well besides Tangled). I'll need to go watch Big Hero 6 soon.I dont think any of the new Disney movies are near the really great Pixar movies, just very consistently good. I am very excited for Inside Out. I love the premise.
Yeah. I don't know what the fuck everyone is talking about. 500+ is a great number, although domestic will come in under what they expected. Nolan's last two original flicks are going to both be above 500M worldwide. That's a pretty huge success.Referring to a 39% second week drop as "sinking" is one of the worst analyses I've seen in these threads.
Yeah that will never happen with Nolan. His movies consistently come under budget, and it's reported that Interstellar came under budget by a considerable margin. He's spoken before about having to be mindful/respectful of the people that invest in his productions.
It's a letdown only in the sense that Inception made $825M WW.
Still, it will be a very profitable movie and studios will be lining up to bid for his next project.