• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

WSJ: Millennials Unearth Amazing Hack to Get Free TV, the Antenna (Not The Onion)

Syriel

Member
I live in town with perfect reception and OTA absolutely does not look better than cable. I have directly compared them because everyone keeps saying OTA looks better, it simply does not.

You're one of those folks who always has "motion smoothing" turned on because it "looks better," aren't ya?
 

jfkgoblue

Member
You're one of those folks who always has "motion smoothing" turned on because it "looks better," aren't ya?
No...

But I do have cable and I do have an antenna, and literally the only difference was the OTA signal was about a second ahead of the cable one.
 

Dishwalla

Banned
I live in town with perfect reception and OTA absolutely does not look better than cable. I have directly compared them because everyone keeps saying OTA looks better, it simply does not.

It should, because getting the signal directly over the air means it doesn't suffer from the compression that the signal has to have to go through the cable lines.
 

jfkgoblue

Member
It should, because getting the signal directly over the air means it doesn't suffer from the compression that the signal has to have to go through the cable lines.
The compression is minimal and OTA and cable both have either 720p(ABC and Fox) or 1080i(CBS and NBC) resolutions. I keep wanting to see the difference because I feel like I am missing something, but it simply isn't a noticeable difference.
 

Dishwalla

Banned
I mean I don't have cable right now to compare, but every time I've compared them in the past I could tell a difference. The colors in the OTA broadcasts were always more pronounced and brighter, and the contrast was sharper. The cable broadcasts were washed out and slightly blurry.
 

hirokazu

Member
It should, because getting the signal directly over the air means it doesn't suffer from the compression that the signal has to have to go through the cable lines.
OTA is also compressed. The quality will vary between free-to-air OTA or by cable depending on:

  • The bandwidth (and therefore the bitrate) allocated to a particular channel on OTA and cable.
  • The compression method used for broadcast (typically either MPEG2 or MPEG4)
  • Whether the free-to-air channel's feed to the cable provider is a higher bitrate than the OTA broadcast or the same feed as what's going OTA and
  • If not, whether the cable provider will then recompress the feed to the fit the bandwidth they've allocated to that channel (compressing something multiple times using lossy codecs will degrade image quality, particularly if the software or hardware doing it isn't the most efficient and the bitrate isn't very high, as is typical when it needs to be real time and there are bandwidth limitations)
 
Lots of cable companies are getting around that by requiring a box from them to receive the channels. The area here is served by Cox, and I can't simply plug a co-ax into the wall socket to my TV, nothing comes across. I would need to rent a box from Cox(because they won't let you simply buy one, they love getting that monthly fee), and I ain't doing that.

Not legal for them to do that. I'd contact the FCC and file a complaint. Cable companies are required to have local channels through the cable lines whether you're a subscriber or not. You sure your TV isn't set to antenna? It still needs to be and you still have to do a full channel scan.
 

CLEEK

Member
It should, because getting the signal directly over the air means it doesn't suffer from the compression that the signal has to have to go through the cable lines.

What? That's completely wrong. OTA digital broadcasts still require compression. There's only limited bandwidth in the EM spectrum that's available to broadcasters.

Like all digital media, the quality of OTA digital broadcasts comes from the codec used e.g. MPEG2 and the bit-rate. You can have HD broadcasts with low bit rate, and you'll get compression artifacts, as you would if you watch a low bit rate BD rip.
 
1) Turn TV on.
2) Watch.

How is that "too much effort?"

you have to keep track of the schedule

everything made by swedish public service television is put on their website for sometime after broadcasting for streaming at your leisure

and i'd rather watch what i want ad-free using services like hbo and netflix than keep track of the tv schedule
 

Dishwalla

Banned
Not legal for them to do that. I'd contact the FCC and file a complaint. Cable companies are required to have local channels through the cable lines whether you're a subscriber or not. You sure your TV isn't set to antenna? It still needs to be and you still have to do a full channel scan.

Just tried to hook a cable straight from the wall outlet to my small TV, get nothing but blue screens on both cable mode and antenna mode, even after a scan. Well that's not completely true for some reason channel 16 on cable is the color bars.

I remember last year or the year before Cox around here kept putting out that they were going to cease offering the analog signal of their services, including the broadcasts(here those are channel 2, 10, 13, 43, etc). When they started this process one by one channels disappeared from the analog signal, instead giving way to a splash screen saying the channel was only available vie digital, which required a box. Think it was May of last year the last of the analog channels were finally removed, and now you have to have a box of some type between the wall outlet and the TV to get anything at all. If I try and view channel 10-1(NBC) or whatever via the wall outlet only, my TV displays a "scrambled" message.

Also refer to this: http://www.courant.com/consumer/bottom-line/hc-bottom-line-cox-all-digital-20141215-column.html
A Federal Communications Commission ruling in late 2012 allows cable providers to shut down unencrypted basic channels — major networks ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC and PBS, and public access. Unencrypted analog signals were easily shared (or stolen) by wiring multiple televisions from a single cable feed using a splitter. The encrypted digital signals are unwatchable without a decoder box.

Cable companies, as part of the FCC ruling, must offer basic-cable customers who have no set-top boxes in the house — often the poor or elderly — either a set-top box or, where applicable, a CableCard free for two years. Medicaid recipients get a box at no cost for five years.
So while there are options to help ease the burden for certain people, cable companies are no longer legally required to offer CBS/NBC/ABC/etc for free straight through the wall outlet.

What? That's completely wrong. OTA digital broadcasts still require compression. There's only limited bandwidth in the EM spectrum that's available to broadcasters.

Like all digital media, the quality of OTA digital broadcasts comes from the codec used e.g. MPEG2 and the bit-rate. You can have HD broadcasts with low bit rate, and you'll get compression artifacts, as you would if you watch a low bit rate BD rip.

What I mean is the signals go through more compression on a cable system than they do OTA, because those cable lines host far more channels than the OTA spectrum in any given city.
 
The way they made it sound back when they had the transition to HD, I actually though they *were* stopping broadcast of local stations. In fact I was pretty sure they mentioned on many of our local stations we wouldn't be able to watch any more.

Now I guess I just never figured they were still there but I suppose that makes sense.
 

hirokazu

Member
Also refer to this: http://www.courant.com/consumer/bottom-line/hc-bottom-line-cox-all-digital-20141215-column.html

So while there are options to help ease the burden for certain people, cable companies are no longer legally required to offer CBS/NBC/ABC/etc for free straight through the wall outlet.
You guys don't have mandatory OTA broadcasts in the US? What are these local free-to-air channels and what area are they supposed to be serving if you can't receive them without cable?

What I mean is the signals go through more compression on a cable system than they do OTA, because those cable lines host far more channels than the OTA spectrum in any given city.
Not necessarily, see my previous post.

The way they made it sound back when they had the transition to HD, I actually though they *were* stopping broadcast of local stations. In fact I was pretty sure they mentioned on many of our local stations we wouldn't be able to watch any more.

Now I guess I just never figured they were still there but I suppose that makes sense.
It sounds to me like the FCC completely fucked up the DTV transition if people are misinformed at what's going on. In Australia we got a ton of ads and info to make sure even 100 year old retirees understood what needed to be done to continue watching free-to-air.
 

JettDash

Junior Member
You guys don't have mandatory OTA broadcasts in the US? What are these local free-to-air channels and what area are they supposed to be serving if you can't receive them without cable?

Um, there are free OTA channels though not everyone lives in range of them. His point was regarding getting those channels for free via cable.
 

Arc

Member
Yeah generally an indoor antenna is going to kind of suck though, even in major cities. Need that rooftop for reliable signal.

Absolutely untrue. I live outside of Boston and get perfect HD with my $12 antenna inside my bedroom.
 

hirokazu

Member
Um, there are free OTA channels though not everyone lives in range of them. His point was regarding getting those channels for free via cable.
Yeah, that's what I'm asking because I'd have expected these channels to be receivable by aerial unless you live in the remotest of places, but I guess it's different in the US.

EDIT: I just re-read the FCC ruling and it's not that the FCC ruled that cable companies providing FTA on their service can encrypt those channels, but that they don't have to carry those FTA channels if they don't want to. That's ridiculous when large swathes of the population aren't covered by the OTA footprint and it's no wonder a lot of people don't know OTA is available - because there are areas where it just isn't.

Now why Dishwalla's local cable provider is providing FTA channels but are encrypting them and putting them behind their subscription service is a whole other question.
 

BobLoblaw

Banned
Antenna is still how I get my NFL fix. CBS, Fox, and NBC. Fox's shitty 720p feed still boggles the mind. I have Directv Now for ESPN, but the production values on MNF are so awful, I rarely watch.
 
Antenna TV is awful though

100% Free uncompressed audio and HD video is somehow worse than pay to watch compressed signals coming from cable companies?

edit. For anyone curious to try, there is a $35 Winegard outside antenna that will pick up just about any signal. Indoor is hit and miss depending on your location and just isn't that great. My Winegard picks up over 70 HD channels.
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Winegard-Freevision-Outdoor-HDTV-Antenna-FVHD30H/203972856

I mounted this on the outside of my house, pointed it to where I knew the signal was coming from (websites can help if you put in your zip code), ran the coax to my TV in about 15 minutes. I then ran optical from my TV to my receiver and I get full 5.1 audio in addition to my free HD. I mostly use this for free NFL games in the fall.
 

Dishwalla

Banned
Now why Dishwalla's local cable provider is providing FTA channels but are encrypting them and putting them behind their subscription service is a whole other question.

Because the FCC ruled that Cox doesn't have to provide them for free, so naturally they are gonna lock it behind a slight paywall. Gotta make that money somehow.

I even still have Cox internet, just not the TV service. This house is wired for it and has an active signal going through it, but I can't get TV through those lines unless I pay for a box. Which I don't want to do.
 

JettDash

Junior Member
Yeah, that's what I'm asking because I'd have expected these channels to be receivable by aerial unless you live in the remotest of places, but I guess it's different in the US.

I live like 75 miles from the city where the ABC/CBS/NBC/Fox stations are. Too far to get the OTA broadcasts. It isn't a remote place though.
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Are you kidding? Sometimes the antenna channels are better IQ than cable/satellite because it's uncompressed

Old school antenna was definitely awful though.

Honestly, I didn't know you could get free OVER THE AIR antenna channels until super recently maybe 6 years ago and I'm 30 so this doesn't surprise me.

It's compressed but it's 19Mbps.
 

Syriel

Member
Yeah, that's what I'm asking because I'd have expected these channels to be receivable by aerial unless you live in the remotest of places, but I guess it's different in the US.

EDIT: I just re-read the FCC ruling and it's not that the FCC ruled that cable companies providing FTA on their service can encrypt those channels, but that they don't have to carry those FTA channels if they don't want to. That's ridiculous when large swathes of the population aren't covered by the OTA footprint and it's no wonder a lot of people don't know OTA is available - because there are areas where it just isn't.

Now why Dishwalla's local cable provider is providing FTA channels but are encrypting them and putting them behind their subscription service is a whole other question.

The bolded is true. Most of the US gets the standard broadcast networks OTA for free. Just toss up an antenna and you're good.

If there is anything remotely resembling a city, you're good.
 

J@hranimo

Banned
My Dad tried doing this in the house and it worked sometimes.

It's a good idea but varies with your area and of course the weather.
 

EctoPrime

Member
You can also record multiple channels at once with a dvr if it has multiple tuners and build a giant backlog of content to watch in just a few weeks.
With a basic digital converter box you can even connect it to a vcr to record and still use your analog tv. Even the HD channels if the box downscales the output. Considering most televisions got dumped years ago the scenario will be unlikely that many would do it though.
 
You'd be amazed at the signal quality you can get by tethering a spool of copper to your tv and setting it on a high shelf.

I think he was talking about the content, not the quality.

He's right. Ain't shit on those 20-30 free channels I was getting. Unless you like paternity tests.
 

Souzetsu

Member
The switch from analog to digital and the HD quality channels that came with it blew my mind, but it just came too late. Now I don't use anything other than Internet-based video.
 

smisk

Member
I've thought about getting one of these, but I don't watch local channels enough. Only sport I watch is baseball which is only through cable :(
 

Apath

Member
Been using one for years. Works pretty well even in my first floor unit and the picture quality is great. Saves me over $150/mo by allowing my to cut out my cable bill.
 

SRG01

Member
100% Free uncompressed audio and HD video is somehow worse than pay to watch compressed signals coming from cable companies?

edit. For anyone curious to try, there is a $35 Winegard outside antenna that will pick up just about any signal. Indoor is hit and miss depending on your location and just isn't that great. My Winegard picks up over 70 HD channels.
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Winegard-Freevision-Outdoor-HDTV-Antenna-FVHD30H/203972856

I mounted this on the outside of my house, pointed it to where I knew the signal was coming from (websites can help if you put in your zip code), ran the coax to my TV in about 15 minutes. I then ran optical from my TV to my receiver and I get full 5.1 audio in addition to my free HD. I mostly use this for free NFL games in the fall.

Alternatively, there's plenty of DIY projects for OTA antennas: http://www.instructables.com/id/Quick-Makeshift-HDTV-Antenna/
 

night814

Member
I work in a nursing home with 250 patients and at least 200 have an antenna like this. They work most of the time and the residents get by just fine watching network shows and local news.
 

Drkirby

Corporate Apologist
I bought a decent powered Antenna, but due to where my Apartment is (2nd floor of 4 floor building, windows faces out to a courtyard) I don't get many channels, which kind of sucks. I can't even use my Clock Radio to listen to the station I want due to how much the signal gets blocked, and I have to step out to the balcony to talk on my cellphone.
 

Dishwalla

Banned
The antenna I use right now has an inline amplifier in it that plugs into a power outlet, but the antenna works better when I don't have it plugged into the power outlet. Never figured that out.

I get every TV station I'm supposed to receive as said by rabbitears.info, except WSKY-TV for some reason. Have tried many times to pull that station in, and I simply can't.
 

Rest

All these years later I still chuckle at what a fucking moron that guy is.
(Not The Onion)

MKmZtTz.gif
 

Staccat0

Fail out bailed
People always say "I get 20 channels with my antenna", but neglect to mention that's like 5 different PBS channels, 3 Christian evangelical channels, 2 Spanish channels, and 1 channel that plays nothing but reruns of TV shows from the 50's.
TBF it's free and cable is mostly trash too.

Streaming plus a nice digital antenna is a great way to live. Sometimes it's nice being able to watch something as it happens without a lotta bullshit.

If my cable company would give me a sweetheart deal on the 3 channels I give a fuck about I would be in. Getting NBC and PBS for free is aight.
 

SubjectNineteen

Neo Member
So, will we see those unsightly TV antennas sprouting up from rooftops like skeletal metal trees again? We had one of those for decades. And then we got a satellite dish. But of course this was in the '90s, so the dish was the size of a merry-go-round. We have Direct TV now, though I never use it. The rest of my family does, though.

Have modern TV antennas evolved to be relatively small now? I honestly have never seen one. I can only conceptualize the big gangly antennas of old. If one was of a manageable size, I'd actually consider getting one, as I'd like to watch the local news now and again.
 

Fox Mulder

Member
I think you mean great. Way better quality than the compressed shit you get through cable.

It still depends on distance to the broadcast tower or terrain. I worked with Dish Network and they gave them free when they had local channels takedown disputes. Theyd send me out to hook up the shit and people would sometimes still not pick up channels and get pissed.
 
Top Bottom