There are many other threads linking Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. She lives in New Yorks suburban Westchester County. He owns golf courses all over Westchester County. Mr. Trumps television show The Apprentice aired on NBC. Until last year Chelsea Clinton was employed by NBC. Mr. Trump did his graduate studies at a snooty Ivy League school: Penn. Hillary got her law degree from Yale. See how it all fits together?
http://www.wsj.com/articles/clearly-the-donald-works-for-hillary-1438382894
Google search "Clearly, the Donald Works for Hillary" to read the entire piece.
Numerous experts have described Donald Trumps quixotic presidential candidacy as a gift to Hillary Clinton. His hateful remarks about immigration, his disparaging of John McCains military service and his disrespectful comments about women who breast-feed have put the Republican Party on the defensive.
I love that this piece completely misses the point. Any candidate can make obnoxious, insensitive, idiotic statements - plenty of candidates do! And most would be ridiculed or otherwise completely ignored, as most assumed Trump would be (and he was ignored up until about a month or two ago).
The problem for the GOP is that when Trump makes those statements and panders to the more extreme elements of their voter base, his support seems to go up rather than down, making him a contender in the primaries and a threat to their chances in the general election. As in - the problem isn't Trump, it's the crazy base voters who've unexpectedly taken a shining to Trump and are driving up his chances in the polls.
So the WSJ should really be asking if the GOP base voters are working for Hillary rather than Trump, because they're the ones who are screwing up the GOP's chances in the general election.
I love that this piece completely misses the point. Any candidate can make obnoxious, insensitive, idiotic statements - plenty of candidates do! And most would be ridiculed or otherwise completely ignored, as most assumed Trump would be (and he was ignored up until about a month or two ago).
The problem for the GOP is that when Trump makes those statements and panders to the more extreme elements of their voter base, his support seems to go up rather than down, making him a contender in the primaries and a threat to their chances in the general election. As in - the problem isn't Trump, it's the crazy base voters who've unexpectedly taken a shining to Trump and are driving up his chances in the polls.
So the WSJ should really be asking if the GOP base voters are working for Hillary rather than Trump, because they're the ones who are screwing up the GOP's chances in the general election.
I love that this piece completely misses the point. Any candidate can make obnoxious, insensitive, idiotic statements - plenty of candidates do! And most would be ridiculed or otherwise completely ignored, as most assumed Trump would be (and he was ignored up until about a month or two ago).
The problem for the GOP is that when Trump makes those statements and panders to the more extreme elements of their voter base, his support seems to go up rather than down, making him a contender in the primaries and a threat to their chances in the general election. As in - the problem isn't Trump, it's the crazy base voters who've unexpectedly taken a shining to Trump and are driving up his chances in the polls.
So the WSJ should really be asking if the GOP base voters are working for Hillary rather than Trump, because they're the ones who are screwing up the GOP's chances in the general election.
Well said.
However, the bolded requires a level of self-reflection that I do not think the GOP currently have.
Whenever they get spanked in elections, the GOP always blame the RINOs and GOP candidate not being "conservative enough!"
Will losing a three straight presidential elections finally get GOPers to see the problem with their party?
Nope, not as long as the Tea Party exists. It would only take for someone like Trump or Cruz to run and lose in the general election for the base to realize that they need to push more to the center. Or maybe not. Even in such a scenario, many in the Tea Party would still think that they would need someone even further to the right to win an election. They'll also use their mid-term election wins to justify their ability to win the White House, completely ignoring any data or numbers that say otherwise.
The Dems need to focus on maintaining the White House, gaining as many seats in the Senate during the general elections, and wait for many of the baby boomers to die off. The Tea Party will do the rest.
The only way I believe that he is secretly working for the Democrats is if he decides to run independent to split the Republican vote. Then I'll know he's in it for sabotage.
Midterms keep them thinking they're doing fine.They should have learned this lesson in the last cycle but didn't. The writing has been on the wall for the last 4 or 5 years that pandering to the tea party nutjobs is not going to lead to success but the problem for the GOP is that they can't put the genie back in the lamp now.
This is more about demonizing Hillary and painting her as manipulative and untrustworthy than condemning Trump.I hate that this theory is being echoed.
It's like people can't believe Trump really is this much of a buffoon and they're trying to piece together a reality that he's just some kind of double agent doing it for reason x.
Trump has always been a dumb person. He's getting all of this attention because his remarks make for good headlines and he's also low hanging fruit that can be used to discredit his party.
This attention has actually gotten him some support from voters. It seems like americans are more influenced by publicity whether it be good or bad and name recognition (hence Bush and Clinton being top candidates). Maybe he sees this and is intentionally trying to create controversy.
Exactly. I love it.Murdoch empire upset they can't control the story with Trump so they throw out a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
I don't particularly care much for Trump, but I will say his run for president is interesting as outlets that are usually so used to controlling the narrative don't know how to deal with him because they can't get their hooks into him and control him with promises of funding.
They should have learned this lesson in the last cycle but didn't. The writing has been on the wall for the last 4 or 5 years that pandering to the tea party nutjobs is not going to lead to success but the problem for the GOP is that they can't put the genie back in the lamp now.
I don't get why this pic is being used against Trump. Have Republicans never come in contact with Democrats before this or something? It's total hypocrisy.
1) This must be an odd time to be a moderate or establishment Republican. It has to be really uncomfortable for them to be aligned with the far right base. So I can understand if they would prefer to avoid reckoning with their political coalition and instead take this as another opportunity to throw out weird conspiracy theories about Hillary.
2) I'm pretty sure Trump's ego would prevent him from doing what this article is suggesting.
3) If I were a moderate Repub I'd be more worried about how Trump's success seems to be based on a platform that is essentially "loud racist Democrat." Trump's campaign just seems to be a white-supremacist populist movement, and it should be terrifying to everyone that this is striking a cord with ~20-25% of the Republicans.
This is the Republicans working to destroy Trump. They know he doesn't stand a chance in the general election. The party leaders are going to destroy him so he doesn't win.
Reap what you sow I guess.
This is the Republicans working to destroy Trump. They know he doesn't stand a chance in the general election. The party leaders are going to destroy him so he doesn't win.
Reap what you sow I guess.
Trump said if doesn't get a fair shot by Republicans he'll go 3rd Party, which will destroy them right back so they can't win.
As for not standing a chance, who knows? He's polling really high. Time will tell if he says something TOO stupid and I think Thursday will be a telling day, since IIRC that's when the 1st debates are. How he handles himself there is anyone's guess (including Trump). I'm going to wait until then to make a judgment about his chances.
They can't though. They can't touch Trump. That's why all of this is hilarious.
"Your state is a pile of shit." is exactly the kind of criticism everyone should be leveling towards Walker. Minnesota and Wisconsin are not all that different demographically or culturally. They're two of the most similar states in the country to be honest. Yet Minnesota is doing well while Wisconsin has done nothing but flounder under Walker's leadership. The political contrast between the two states is like night and day. It's clear that Walker is a terrible governor, so why the hell should he be given the national equivalent of that state position?
I'm amazed more Republicans DON'T bring this up
I think it's impossible for Trump to stop being a douche.Though he kind of has to stop being a douche as well. That may get the base, but up against Hillary it's a losing strategy.
I'm amazed more Republicans DON'T bring this up
"Your state is a pile of shit." is exactly the kind of criticism everyone should be leveling towards Walker. Minnesota and Wisconsin are not all that different demographically or culturally. They're two of the most similar states in the country to be honest. Yet Minnesota is doing well while Wisconsin has done nothing but flounder under Walker's leadership. The political contrast between the two states is like night and day. It's clear that Walker is a terrible governor, so why the hell should he be given the national equivalent of that state position?
I'm amazed more Republicans DON'T bring this up
They don't bring it up because most of them AGREE with Walker's policies. Just as most of them agree with Brownback's policies in Kansas, to name another Republican-led state that is falling apart.
Everything I've read about Walker and his handling of the state sounds exactly like what Jindal's been doing here in Louisiana, only without all the crazy prayer rallies. And unions were already broken here."Your state is a pile of shit." is exactly the kind of criticism everyone should be leveling towards Walker. Minnesota and Wisconsin are not all that different demographically or culturally. They're two of the most similar states in the country to be honest. Yet Minnesota is doing well while Wisconsin has done nothing but flounder under Walker's leadership. The political contrast between the two states is like night and day. It's clear that Walker is a terrible governor, so why the hell should he be given the national equivalent of that state position?
I'm amazed more Republicans DON'T bring this up
Well, the problem is that they have been successful with this nuttery....but only in their heavily gerrymandered districts and during mid-term elections. But for a national presidential election.....what they are selling doesn't work well anymore. War & gay-bashing are not a winning formula.They should have learned this lesson in the last cycle but didn't. The writing has been on the wall for the last 4 or 5 years that pandering to the tea party nutjobs is not going to lead to success but the problem for the GOP is that they can't put the genie back in the lamp now.
Exactly. Trump would be terrifying as an actual president but right now his statements don't toe the party line at all, and its fucking awesome. Sometimes that means forgetting to dogwhistle and just being racist. Other times it means saying "hey your state is shitty because you don't pay for anything"
![]()
Trump is the unforeseen variable in the equation...
Correct. Trump is really going to beat us. We have no chance against him. Vote for him in the primaries Republicans, and you'll totally beat us.Except Trump is going to win. The Democrats are really sleeping on him right now if they're foolish enough to think he's helping them by being so outrageous.