temp said:I saw Saw. Saw sucked. See Saw II? Sorry.
DarienA said:Wow Saw 1 came out last October... wtf....
goodcow said:They shot Saw 1 in 18 days, with only 5 days of pre-production...
goodcow said:They shot Saw 1 in 18 days, with only 5 days of pre-production...
GDJustin said:18 days? You're kidding me.
A movie I've never heard of was done in a week as part of a contest? Well that's amazing.Bebpo said:Lots of movies are shot in under that timeframe.
For example Ryuhei Kitamura's Azumi and Aragami were both supposedly shot in a single week as part of a "who can make the best film in a week" battle with the director of 2LDK (forgot the name).
temp said:A movie I've never heard of was done in a week as part of a contest? Well that's amazing.
Yeah, but... Azumi isn't part of that equation at all. You're thinking of Aragami and "The Messenger", his entry into the first Jam Films collection of shorts. It was doable because both movies use the same actors (and Aragami only uses three or four, one of which is that dude that's in all Kitamura movies so he doesn't count), and Aragami only takes place in one single room.Bebpo said:For example Ryuhei Kitamura's Azumi and Aragami were both supposedly shot in a single week as part of a "who can make the best film in a week" battle with the director of 2LDK (forgot the name).
what about post-production?goodcow said:They shot Saw 1 in 18 days, with only 5 days of pre-production...
Bebpo said:Lots of movies are shot in under that timeframe.
For example Ryuhei Kitamura's Azumi and Aragami were both supposedly shot in a single week as part of a "who can make the best film in a week" battle with the director of 2LDK (forgot the name).
Angst said:Nobody liked Saw? I think it's on of the most original 'horror'-movies in a long while. Simply excellent in my humble opinion.
temp said:A movie I've never heard of was done in a week as part of a contest? Well that's amazing.