:lol :lol :lolCerrius said:- A solid worldwide #2 position (surpassing industry veteran Nintendo)
.
.
.
- Snatched the legendary developer Rare from Nintendo.
ou-yay are-way ill-stay in-way enial-day ol-lay
:lol :lol :lolCerrius said:- A solid worldwide #2 position (surpassing industry veteran Nintendo)
.
.
.
- Snatched the legendary developer Rare from Nintendo.
wobedraggled said:If you want a company that screwed so much innovation out of the computer market on it's way up running the show, have at it, I'll pass thanks.
Far from it.LM4sure said:Doomed?
Cerrius said:- Established a solid first-party portfolio (FABLE , etc.)
Speevy said:Yeah, that's Nintendo, progressive and fair to competitors as well as developers. Always.
Please let them have a similar fate with the 360 so they can bow out of an industry they had no right entering in the first place.
wobedraggled said:Heh,
I don't like the way MS handles itself therefore it comes out in my statement's about them. I'm quite a gamer actually, atari on up.
If you want a company that screwed so much innovation out of the computer market on it's way up running the show, have at it, I'll pass thanks.
FiRez said:Now, think how bad will be the industry without MS, is the number of competitors that bring innovations. heck if you think about it without MS, Nintendo probably would bring another traditional console.
btw you're stupid
..pakbeka.. said:but you can play that on a pc
Firest0rm said:Your could get banned for that last comment.
The member with the batman avatar said:Please let them have a similar fate with the 360 so they can bow out of an industry they had no right entering in the first place.
wobedraggled said:Heh,
I don't like the way MS handles itself therefore it comes out in my statement's about them. I'm quite a gamer actually, atari on up.
If you want a company that screwed so much innovation out of the computer market on it's way up running the show, have at it, I'll pass thanks.
Letter to Elise said:Are you aware of nintendo's history? Please don't let yourself be blinded.
quadriplegicjon said:to be fair, nintendo doesnt act that way anymore.. MS on the other hand is pretty damn bad..
quadriplegicjon said:to be fair, nintendo doesnt act that way anymore.. MS on the other hand is pretty damn bad..
DCharlie said:..- ..-. ..- -.-. -.- .. -. --. .. -.. .. --- - .-.-.-
SyNapSe said:What has MS done wrong with Sparkle? It hasn't even released yet has it?
When you're almost irrelevant, it's kinda hard to kick anybody around.quadriplegicjon said:to be fair, nintendo doesnt act that way anymore..
Ronin said:When you're almost irrelevant, it's kinda hard to kick anybody around.
wobedraggled said:all too easy.
wobedraggled said:And when your a monopoly it's all too easy.
Letter to Elise said:IMO they don't because they are no longer in power to do so.
Not sure what Microsoft has done in the videogame field lately or at all.
Care to share some of their offenses? I'm probably just ignorant here.
Ronin said:When you're almost irrelevant, it's kinda hard to kick anybody around.
Letter to Elise said:Yes and that worked well for Nintendo. Everything you say in this thread applies to Nintendo.
Is it possible for you to post without blinders? In my short time here you've stood out as one of the most rose-coloured glasses wearing individuals I've seen at GAF.
I know you cannot really feel this way.
wobedraggled said:Not a fan of monoplies, wasn't a fan of Ninty back in the day actually.
Sorry my viewpoint sucks to everyone out there, but it's mine and i'm sticking to it.
I miss Sega.![]()
SyNapSe said:I don't think it's your viewpoint, as I imagine 30% or more of the board shares the same opinioin. It's your posting style.
jett said:Well what can I say, Microsoft is probably the only company in the world that can force themselves in such a way into an industry, affording to lose 4 freaking billion dollars and risk launching a new console when the first one was far from a success. IMO, the chances of 360 being a hit worldwide are pretty slim, and I think it'll need to be one to "make money"(nevermind that the probability of the 360 recouping the losses of the XBOX are pretty remote). I wonder if they'll continue on this path for the next-next gen.
Speevy said:Sony first found success by attracting developers. MS has done an absolutely fantastic job of that. There has been a consistently high quality selection of Xbox titles on the shelves from day one. If the only proof of success is Sony's 68% market share, I'd prefer to look at it from a gamer's perspective. MS will be around as long as we care, and we do.
...affording to lose 4 freaking billion dollars and risk launching a new console when the first one was far from a success.
hell they are already cutting generation short while they are really really really really distance 2nd. :loljett said:If the XBOX isn't an uberhit worldwide, MS will probably once again cut the generation short. And, you know, that can't be good for the industry.![]()
jett said:Read it all buddy, and let it sink in. BTW, if you think it's an accomplishment that freaking Microsoft "managed" to get developers on board the XBOX, then hell I don't know what to tell you. Sure, Microsoft also "managed" to get the XBOX brand into the minds(a half a billion marketing campaign pretty much guarantees that) of american gamers(in some capacity). But will the 360 manage to recoup the losses of the original XBOX? Is it going to be worth it for Microsoft? You may like to think that MS is releasing the 360 for the gamers, but that's bullshit of the highest degree. They came into this industry knowing they would lose money at first, and hoping to make more than what they lost later. I, personally, don't see evidence of that happening. If the XBOX isn't an uberhit worldwide, MS will probably once again cut the generation short. And, you know, that can't be good for the industry.![]()
Ronin said:When you're almost irrelevant, it's kinda hard to kick anybody around.
Letter to Elise said:You are alot like woebedraggled, except not for Nintendo. X|
jett said:*raises an eyebrow* Hey don't insult me, my comments are far from the ntroll's "MICROSOFT DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE IN ZE INDUSTRY". My guess is that you're a lot like speevy.My posts may have been harsh, but I don't think they were fanboyish.
Please let them have a similar fate with the 360 so they can bow out of an industry they had no right entering in the first place.
wobedraggled said:Please let them have a similar fate with the 360 so they can bow out of an industry they had no right entering in the first place.
JoDark said:Once again... silly gaf!!
This huge corp loses BILLIONS to give us kick ass hw and a lot of great games... and LIVE!!! and there are complaints??? wtf!
Anyway, in the last few years, MS has made 1 billion in profit EVERY MONTH!!!!... losing 4b in an investment for the fight over the living room with Sony, as well as the HUGE overall gain to the overall ms image; well worth the $$.
btw, MS is trying to have the 360 make 1b over it's whole life. So, whole MS, 1b/month profit. 360, 1b profit in like 5 + years. Feels possible.
Either way, a shitload of kick ass HD game in less than 2 monthsand we get all the X05 kick ass hype in what, 8 days!!!
gamergirly said:That's the rest of MS's divisions, not the home entertainment group(where the Xbox division is in). MS wont be making billions forever
"That's the rest of MS's divisions, not the home entertainment group(where the Xbox division is in). MS wont be making billions forever, and if some people here's wishes come true, then eventually some type of profitable solution must be implemented."
"Also, it's rough(unless you have some type of strong belief one way or another) making predictions of a console's success or failure when the market can easily change in the future. Xbox360 might end up in a worse position than it is in now. We must all be prepared to buy our destined console that dies prematurely. Gamers always win but some console will fail"