Yup, I was thinking the same while watching his response. The whole thing is sketchy. While I'm not ready to throw the guy in prison, the fact that he used a huge portion of his almost 20 minute video to deflect and bring up his family over and over has me more suspicious than before.Sounds like he is guilty from his new response comically playing the victim.
i did and only god knows.Anyone do the math on interest and was that handed over?
Why are the fans of him forgetting the part where he only donated now after 10 years only when this issue is raised?It seems that the money had finally been donated as promised. Now to see what happen in the next few weeks. Will this be enough?Open Hand Foundation Provides AFTD $600K for FTD Research | AFTD
AFTD is pleased to announce that we have received a gift of $600,000 from the Open Hand Foundation to further its mission to hasten a cure for FTD and improvewww.theaftd.org
Why are the fans of him forgetting the part where he only donated now after 10 years only when this issue is raised?
Its more of a "im sorry i got caught" move
So again, why donate now?
-Donating a few weeks after this getting brought to light probably isn't a coincidence.
Reckon he can bounce back from this?
Surely he can't be trusted running a charity going forward at the very least :S
I hope the irs are doing an audit. I don't trust him...
So he finally donated now? All of it, or some of it?Why are the fans of him forgetting the part where he only donated now after 10 years only when this issue is raised?
Its more of a "im sorry i got caught" move
I think the lawsuit threat is a bluff. Because once he sues them then everything comes out. It makes great PR, though, which is why so many people say it without following through.I do think Jobst and Mutahar got over the skis with some of the accusations they made after their initials videos and that's mostly due to their lack of understanding of charities, tax and accounting practices. That said, Jirard looks like he got his hand caught in the cookie jar. Maybe it's okay to collect donations to pool them for a restricted donation, but if that's really the case then why donate now? His initial interview with Jobst/Mutahar came off incredibly poorly in asking them for suggestions of which organization to donate to. And according to Jirard, both his legal team and accounts said he did noting wrong. So again, why donate now? t's also incredibly poor form to repeatedly tout the charities that you've donated to when you've donated nothing monetarily. That's a lot worse than not just being "transparent" and probably is in the realm of fraud. At best, Jirard is a liar and lied to his audience to entice them to donate to his charity. It's a good thing he is stepping away from Open Hand. No one should trust him again, especially when it comes to charity. I can understand wanting to take legal action towards Jobst and Mutahar but I do wonder what it accomplishes. Jirard and has some well deserved egg on his face and I do wonder who would foot the bill for legal council. The Open Hand Foundation?
I bet he followed through when he seen that original video.which is why so many people say it without following through.
He's clearly quite happy to openly lie on camera about where the donations were going. If nothing else, an official, open book audit is required.
Stop caping for him. He's lying through his teeth.Where are the lies? At most he said he was "working with" the different organizations, which can easily fall under figuring out what's needed for unrestricted donations. The implication is there, don't get me wrong, but not quite lying. That would of course assume his paper trail of communication with these organizations was true, and where they were in talks at the time. As for the none of it goes to us, that means it all goes to the foundation, and expenses in setting up events comes out of that. Still looks like a charity with no full time employees and an unrealistic restricted donations goal let things slide for way too long which is a problem, but doesn't seem to be what Jobst is implying.
This really grinds my gears. I hope the dude gets whats coming for him.So scummy. Pimping out his dead mum while lying repeatedly.
Are you really that ignorant. His charity videos implied that he donated already to various charities, dementia / alzheimmer.Where are the lies? At most he said he was "working with" the different organizations, which can easily fall under figuring out what's needed for unrestricted donations. The implication is there, don't get me wrong, but not quite lying. That would of course assume his paper trail of communication with these organizations was true, and where they were in talks at the time. As for the none of it goes to us, that means it all goes to the foundation, and expenses in setting up events comes out of that. Still looks like a charity with no full time employees and an unrealistic restricted donations goal let things slide for way too long which is a problem, but doesn't seem to be what Jobst is implying.
I saw this coming ever since this broke out but good to have confirmation that they have dropped Jirard.
I feel a lot of people will continue to give Jirard a pass short of an actual federal conviction and if that happens there will still be people in denial. I'm looking forward to Karl Jobst's impending video drop that's coming up. He sounds like he's pretty confident in some additional findings he's come across. I'm not saying he 100% should be convicted of fraud, but so far, the more things unfold, the worse it looks. Should be interesting.I fail to see how anyone can trust him going forward. It's a huge deal charity fraud. Everyone who donated feels slighted and repulsed and most who never donated, if they objectively look at the evidence and lies he's said, feel repulsed too.
I think he'll continue his own YouTube channel going forward too see if he can recover and see how many views he gets.
I hope he feels like the POS he is. Again, his dementia riddled mother was used to gain more support/donations. Ugh
I am talking about that tweet that supposedly had all the lies. Not seeing any there. Don't watch Jobst because he's skeezy as hell.This really grinds my gears. I hope the dude gets whats coming for him.
Are you really that ignorant. His charity videos implied that he donated already to various charities, dementia / alzheimmer.
...and the saga continues:
If Jirard really does take this to court, I'll be investing in popcorn futures.
...and the saga continues:
If Jirard really does take this to court, I'll be investing in popcorn futures.
Agree completely. If this ends up in a courtroom I can forsee an Amber Heard type defence. Jirard should just take the L and get on with making YouTube content. He obtained money in the form of donations and he didn't donate that money until he was called out. There's no justification for having that money sitting in an account for over nine years. None.I do think Jobst and Mutahar got over the skis with some of the accusations they made after their initials videos and that's mostly due to their lack of understanding of charities, tax and accounting practices. That said, Jirard looks like he got his hand caught in the cookie jar. Maybe it's okay to collect donations to pool them for a restricted donation, but if that's really the case then why donate now? His initial interview with Jobst/Mutahar came off incredibly poorly in asking them for suggestions of which organization to donate to. And according to Jirard, both his legal team and accounts said he did noting wrong. So again, why donate now? t's also incredibly poor form to repeatedly tout the charities that you've donated to when you've donated nothing monetarily. That's a lot worse than not just being "transparent" and probably is in the realm of fraud. At best, Jirard is a liar and lied to his audience to entice them to donate to his charity. It's a good thing he is stepping away from Open Hand. No one should trust him again, especially when it comes to charity. I can understand wanting to take legal action towards Jobst and Mutahar but I do wonder what it accomplishes. Jirard and has some well deserved egg on his face and I do wonder who would foot the bill for legal council. The Open Hand Foundation?
...and the saga continues:
If Jirard really does take this to court, I'll be investing in popcorn futures.
Agree completely. If this ends up in a courtroom I can forsee an Amber Heard type defence. Jirard should just take the L and get on with making YouTube content.
Would make for interesting content. Jirards greatest completion challenge; obtaining 500 Korok seeds in BOTW or going 100 days without dropping the soap in the shower.Not sure they’ll let him film from his cell.
I hope he does sue so we can get some entertainment. He will be laughed out in court. Dude committed charity fraud and keeps using his dead mom to manipulate. Human trash.
"These people slandered me by saying that I ran multiple fundraisers where I specifically said the money was going to charity but instead sat in my bank account."
"So you donated the money?"
"No, it sat in my bank account"
"Next case!"