"No, no, don't worry guys that was a beta, we'll be fixing that right up don't worry go ahead and preorder."
Single digits? Amazingly, still not as bad as Skyrim PS3.
Oh nvm close the thread and ban the complainers then.This. I played 6 hours of the beta and never encountered single digits once, but I'm sure given a specific scenario it's possible for a very brief moment. Really not worth a thread over.
Agreed. Probably many of the people complaining aren't getting the game. I didn't notice much of a framerate drop in the beta. Certainly not single digits. It played smooth for me and am happy
So only buy absolutely perfect games?
Man, single digits?
That is terrible.
I'm actually very surprised here. the game graphics don't look anything special, with few character count running on not big maps and with low resolution. so this game having framerate issue at all is really a shock to me.
SotC tier
Wait for the DF article before jumping the gun.
So much for Azure servers running the "advanced" bot AI to allow the X1 to focus on graphics.
Shit ain't working it seems.
Engadget piece really was written by MS PR.
I'm gonna guess single digits is an exaggeration.
Can't imagine where they could find one capable...Bet Respawn wish they had more competent console hardware they could have run the game on!
Source engine relies heavily on the cpu side for render. I guess if resolution doesn't have a great impact in these slowdowns, so releasing at 720p not have been the solution. Surely the cpu clock upgrade into xbone was sued by respawn at first.
Titanfall 2 will use a different engine.
Hate to hear how the 360 version fares.
it would be deliciously awkward if the 360 version would have no tearing and a rock solid framerate, even if it's 30 fps.
Completely baseless conspiracy theory: Game "ships" at 792p in order to debunk rumors, performance be damned. Day 1 patch adds "performance mode" option that lowers texture resolution and makes game render at 720p.
We wouldn't be having this problem if it was on ps4!
Hate to hear how the 360 version fares.
That passive-aggressive salt.
Probably just as good as the XB1 version and why MS wants you to forget it even exists.
And what if someone's only option to play this game is their shiny new Xbox One? You're going to give people shit for buying a high profile game like this on a high profile new console, rather than playing it on their ill equipped PC which probably couldn't run the fucking game anyway?Don't buy inferior versions, when there are better options available and you claim to care.
It's like a movie buff complaining that the vhs version of a history of violence doesn't look that great. Well no duh, it's literally technically inferior. Go buy the blu ray if you care.
If you buy the vhs version you're showing you're okay with that existing and showing that the market is still there, they will continue to target it and release inferior options for you to apparently buy and complain about.
Ah it was too easy. The pc version will be fine
They had to squeeze in that extra 72p.
dropping 792p to 720p won't magically make single digit framerate drops to solid 60
Of course not, they'd have to drop texture res as well.
And what if someone's only option to play this game is their shiny new Xbox One? You're going to give people shit for buying a high profile game like this on a high profile new console, rather than playing it on their ill equipped PC which probably couldn't run the fucking game anyway?
Sorry, but that's a dumb fucking analogy you got there. There may be other, more expensive, better options out there, but they aren't available to everyone. They aren't playing a VHS tape on a VHS machine, they're playing a new game on new hardware.
And what if someone's only option to play this game is their shiny new Xbox One? You're going to give people shit for buying a high profile game like this on a high profile new console, rather than playing it on their ill equipped PC which probably couldn't run the fucking game anyway?
Sorry, but that's a dumb fucking analogy you got there. There may be other, more expensive, better options out there, but they aren't available to everyone. They aren't playing a VHS tape on a VHS machine, they're playing a new game on new hardware.
Gies mentions it in the Polygon review, but he downplays it.
Polygon said:If there are complaints to be had, I'd point to performance. Titanfall sits at 60 frames per second most of the time, but when three or four Titans are on the screen at once, firing rockets and arc blasts, things take a dive. It's never not playable, but it is noticeable.