Blade could fill that void.When/what do you think the first Marvel horror movie will be?
Blade could fill that void.When/what do you think the first Marvel horror movie will be?
Curious to see how that works out. James Bond doesn't have any real continuity right? So that time-line gets a soft reboot with every new bond unless I'm misunderstanding. But I'm glad they are considering doing that. Rebooting in this universe would be so unfortunate and a pain for the audience. The biggest challenge would be Stark really.That's exactly what Feige has been saying from early on. Their plan is to "James Bond" it. The negative impact from recasting a main character is far less than rebooting continuity ad-nauseam, especially when every movie is so intrinsically tied to the next.
I was joking. Jokes don't come off well in text.
The jokes are also my dreams.
Honestly I see Blade on television. But obviously he will work on the big screen.Blade
Man-Thing? Is Man-Thing horror? Do Marvel Studios even have the rights for him?
Curious to see how that works out. James Bond doesn't have any real continuity right? So that time-line gets a soft reboot with every new bond unless I'm misunderstanding. But I'm glad they are considering doing that. Rebooting in this universe would be so unfortunate and a pain for the audience. The biggest challenge would be Stark really.
When/what do you think the first Marvel horror movie will be?
Curious to see how that works out. James Bond doesn't have any real continuity right? So that time-line gets a soft reboot with every new bond unless I'm misunderstanding. But I'm glad they are considering doing that. Rebooting in this universe would be so unfortunate and a pain for the audience. The biggest challenge would be Stark really.
This movie is only available in 3D on India... How is the 3d?
Note: I hate 3d. I have glasses and putting 3d glasses on top sucks.
The earliest one here is at 7:20pm non-3D. My girlfriend had originally gotten tickets for that showing but I don't get out of work until 6:30pm so I wouldn't have had enough time. Good thing she went back and exchanged the tickets for the 9:00pm show.I noticed a few people saying their theatre is showing it tonight starting at 8:00. The same is true for me... every theatre in the area is showing it starting at 8:00 and many continuing through midnight showings.
The biggest challenge would be Stark really.
While on first glance the initial trailers made this look a bit like a miss, I'm getting pretty hyped...
...at no point did this look like a miss
If CA can draw near the same numbers that the last Thor did, they can care less for this. It's proven by now that the Marvel Studios movies ara as capable to bring the big numbers.
...at no point did this look like a miss
Oh my god... watching it tomorrow!This movie is a TON of fun if you've read the Brubaker run. In fact, he even has a cameo in the movie.![]()
Oh my god... watching it tomorrow!
Tagged in case you want to be truly surprised, but be on the look out for.one of the scientists doing work on Bucky, it's Brubaker
Tagged in case you want to be truly surprised, but be on the look out for.one of the scientists doing work on Bucky, it's Brubaker
RT is now at 89%. Bomba confirmed.
RT is now at 89%. Bomba confirmed.
Holy shit, really?Thats awesome
They should do something like this more often, not only
giving Stan Lee a Cameo, they should give the writers of the adapted storyline also a cameo.
and as it goes with a lot of movie reviews on rottentomatoes, half the negative reviews are absurd and seems to bitch just to bitch without any solid critique of the movie. Like that david poland one where he based some of his negativity because the film is getting a fresh rating on rottentomatoes. It comes off as a "whaaaa i don't enjoy this movie so the people who do are stupid!!" its a wonder how some of them even managed to be reviewers.
It was only a matter of time that this would lower in RT ratings.
Like that david poland one where he based some of his negativity because the film is getting a fresh rating on rottentomatoes. It comes off as a "whaaaa i don't enjoy this movie so the people who do are stupid!!" its a wonder how some of them even managed to be reviewers.
It's not great. It's a shame it's only available in 3D as 2D is definitely the way to go for this.
Well, it does work and they did this twice at least already (Rhodey and Banner)Curious to see how that works out. James Bond doesn't have any real continuity right? So that time-line gets a soft reboot with every new bond unless I'm misunderstanding. But I'm glad they are considering doing that. Rebooting in this universe would be so unfortunate and a pain for the audience. The biggest challenge would be Stark really.
Holy shit, really?Thats awesome
They should do something like this more often, not only
giving Stan Lee a Cameo, they should give the writers of the adapted storyline also a cameo.
I always tell myself not to look at RT, but I still do anyway. These negative reviewers probably give negative reviews because it's a comic book film and they're extremely pretentious.
And my favorite go to is that god awful Man of steel review from expendable's website.
Yep. You should see the Man of Steel Reviews. Dear god those critics were pretentious. Even more so than the movie. And my favorite go to is that god awful Man of steel review from expendable's website. I rolled my eye so much that it went back in time
Blade could fill that void.
When/what do you think the first Marvel horror movie will be?
Well, it does work and they did this twice at least already (Rhodey and Banner)
Well, it does work and they did this twice at least already (Rhodey and Banner)
Oh so the second Hulk movie is in this universe? I was never clear on that. Is that what Banner meant when he said "I broke Harlem"? (I wasn't even clear on where they fought)
Yeah, The Incredible Hulk came out after Iron Man and had Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark in it.
Yeah, The Incredible Hulk came out after Iron Man and had Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark in it.