Such an awesome film. Can't wait to seein action.the twins
In other news, I don't think ending the title with continuation periods was a good idea...
![]()
This is another post-converted 3d film, right? If so, I'm seeing it in 2d.
Yes, and the movie is very obviously directed for 2D viewing.
Gonna see the movie in about two-three hours. Anyone knows if there's a new GotG trailer attach to the film?
Oh and I'm obviously watching it in 2D.
I guess it'll be with Spidey or the X-Men then.It's the one that was released online already.
It's a trailer. More so no trailer that hasn't been out for a while now. If it had been like a world premier trailer, than yeah, I would shut up and listen but every one we had already seen. But to be fair I get what you mean.
Also it doesn't stop the guy from being a douchebag, justified or not. Two wrongs don't make a right. If he had said to us in a respectful and kind way: "Hey do you mind quieting down?"
None of us would have had an issue, but he didn't do that. He started out very angry and trying to act dominant.
Also we weren't the only ones talking. :/
Asking nicely can go a long way, being a dick will only get you ire against you. Lastly this guy was an adult, it wans't some teenager or college student, this guy (I believe) was a parent and should have known better than to act like
a dick.
I liked it, but the entire time I was just thinking "You know what, this entire situation probably could have been handled a lot better if one or two of the other Avengers would have shown up for work today".
This is going to become the Marvel equivalent of the Eagles flying to Mordor thing isn't it?![]()
I liked it, but the entire time I was just thinking "You know what, this entire situation probably could have been handled a lot better if one or two of the other Avengers would have shown up for work today".
SHH: I definitely liked that the movie had its own standalone feel even though it's come after all these other movies. It's very much its own thing, which makes it hard to compare to "The Avengers" or "Thor" or even the first movie.
McFeely: That's very gratifying, and also, it takes place over three-ish days and it allows you to make a very tight story where you don't call up Iron Man to blow some things up for you. That was kind of an imperative going in is getting it to stand alone so that in the back of you're head you're not going, "Wasn't he friends with a huge green guy who can clean that up for him?" That sort of necessitated the tightness and the really frantic pacing of it is that we didn't want time to get baggy and therefore raise some obvious questions.
Just got back. Really enjoyed it but not sure where all the "omg best Marvel movie ever" lines are coming from. I'd put it on par with Thor 2, which I also enjoyed, but under The Avengers and way under Iron Man 1. The plot was fantastic but the general flow and action felt formulaic. Fight scenes were awesome
I thought Thor 2 was awful, just such a dull movie with nothing going for it. Only enjoyed Hulk less.
I liked it, but the entire time I was just thinking "You know what, this entire situation probably could have been handled a lot better if one or two of the other Avengers would have shown up for work today".
Yeah I was thinking the Hulk would have finished up that movie in 10 minutes. But the pacing of the movie makes sense, no one would know what is going on until the end.
I still can't get over how bad Thor 2 was. The script... plotting, pacing, characterization, dialogue... almost everything about it was awful. Super terrible villain too. It also finally made Loki jump the shark as one of the most ridiculous villains out there. I like his charm, but the writing he gets has been haphazard at best.
Seriously?I liked it, but the entire time I was just thinking "You know what, this entire situation probably could have been handled a lot better if one or two of the other Avengers would have shown up for work today".
Seriously?
I guess that unless Marvel starts explicitly mentioning where each Avenger is at the start of each movie people are going to keep saying this.
I still can't get over how bad Thor 2 was. The script... plotting, pacing, characterization, dialogue... almost everything about it was awful. Super terrible villain too. It also finally made Loki jump the shark as one of the most ridiculous villains out there. I like his charm, but the writing he gets has been haphazard at best.
Yeah I was really disappointed with it, especially since I really liked the first one. I think I said this is another thread, but I'm worried that Hiddleston's performance as Loki is going to be too greatly influenced by his tumblr fangirl fame now. It definitely seemed like he knew who he was pandering to in that movie and just played that up. Which is a shame, because I thought his role in the first Thor, was one of the more interesting and nuanced villains seen in a comic book movie.
Iron man blew up his armor, Thor lives in London, Banner is in hiding most likely, Hawkeye is saving rescue dogs.
This is going to do monster numbers.
Iron man blew up his armor, Thor lives in Asgard, Banner is in hiding most likely, Hawkeye is saving rescue dogs.
Up in the air on that.
As for another explanation; all the phase two movies take place in approximately the same time frame.
Im sad you didn't mention blade.
Like wtf.
I don't know if that's necessarily true anymore. It seems more like IM3 was six months after The Avengers, Thor 2 a year later, Cap 2 two years later. And ScarJo just said in a recent interview that Age of Ultron picks up three afters after the first movie. So Phase 2 seems like it's moving in real-time.