Colonel Nasty
Member
Maybe all these characters will make people forget this is a sequel to Man of Steel.
If you think it's a bullshit excuse, please film scripts from superhero TV cartoons using live actors and let me know how that turns out.
This hasn't been true for decades. The target audience for DC and Marvel is the audience that grew up with these characters in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. Your average fanboy (much like your average console gamer) is in their mid thirties, and the stories have reflected this for quite some time. There is a world of difference between an Avengers story in 1988, and an Avengers story in 2014.
Boy do I have a hard time seeing all this shit meshing well with the drab, dreary universe created in Man of Steel.
![]()
This is a disaster in the making, isn't it.
So it's a Justice League movie after all right ? Fuck this shit. Superman deserved his own sequel after MoS (yh I liked the movie, sue me!).
This movie is going to be nearly a JLA movie.
The bloat.
It's too much.
This movie is going to be such a piece of crap.
I thought Man of Steel was supposed to be a more realistic Superman. How are they going to switch it and make it plausible, with all these other superheroes?
This is getting ridiculous, how many superheroes are in this film now?
I didn't want to jump on the bloat bandwagon but now I just don't have a clue what they are doing.
Guys, how many heroes can we squeeze into a Superman sequel!?
I see something wrong with WB's approach of hiring people like David S Goyer.
The overreactions to every bit of news that develops for this film is reaching self parody levels.
Ok, so how long until they just change the name of the movie? lol
did you actually see the movie???
Or maybe they should just have faith in the source material and characters and just make good movies about them? You know, like Marvel did?It really is, I think WB is trying to set up other superhero movies by using Superman/Batman to gauge the interest in the other heroes...
Instead they're just trying to take the shortcut to nab Avengers dollars. It's not really a surprise that people are skeptical.
ISN'T THIS JUST THE FUCKING JUSTICE LEAGUE AT THIS POINT?
Sorry for the caps, I'm amped.
I wouldn't have a problem if they just stop trying to pretend this movie is a Supes/Batman one.
I wouldn't have a problem if they just stop trying to pretend this movie is a Supes/Batman one.
Maybe all these characters will make people forget this is a sequel to Man of Steel.
That is a bullshit premise in response to my pointing out your bullshit excuse![]()
ISN'T THIS JUST THE FUCKING JUSTICE LEAGUE AT THIS POINT?
Sorry for the caps, I'm amped.
Well, the silly equating of TV cartoons and live-action movies did come from you.
UhhhhWB fucking it up. Give back rights to DC Please.
WB fucking it up. Give back rights to DC Please.
If Aquaman, great casting, but Exhibit S why DC still hasn't learned shit from how Marvel built their MCU and what made it successful. Too much up front with not enough to work off of. People will have trouble latching onto any character if there's not even groundwork for them already, especially considering people are already cozy with the MCU.
They don't even have confidence in other A properties, namely Wonder Woman.I think Jason Momoa is an awesome guy but I can't see him as Aquaman.
Also it's funny to see the difference between DC and Marvel's approach. Marvel had the confidence to greenlight Iron Man, Hulk, Captain America and Thor films, all B tier characters at the time. DC meanwhile is hoping the Superman/Batman name pulls their B tier characters out of obscurity, no confidence at all.
Though after the Green Lantern film bombed I can't really blame them for taking this approach.
While I don't disagree this is possible (anything is possible!), they're missing pretty fundamental lessons for why integrating different characters on the screen worked at all, see above. They're at a heavy risk of not giving enough exposure to these characters and just making them look like side attractions off the jump. Previous attempts at a JL movie are pretty irrelevant at this point, nothing came to fruition.Wb is not trying to learn from marvel. They've been trying to get a JL movie off the ground for years before the whole Avengers initiative was a twinkle in Kevin Feige's eye.
There's more than one way to skin a cat. Whether or not this movie is a success isn't going to hinge on how closely they follow Marvel, it's going to be all on execution. If they can execute a team up movie (and it's possible) right off the bat then the movie will be good. If they don't have the ability, then it wouldn't matter if they did a bunch if little lead up solo films first because they wouldn't be any good anyway.
How bloated was Incredibles?
How bloated was Watchmen?
How bloated was Captain America: The Winter Soldier?
How bloated was The Avengers?
How bloated was X-Men?
How bloated was X2: X-Men United?
How bloated was X3: The...
...don't answer that one.
How bloated was X-Men First Class?
If Aquaman, great casting, but Exhibit S why DC still hasn't learned shit from how Marvel built their MCU and what made it successful. Too much up front with not enough to work off of. People will have trouble latching onto any character if there's not even groundwork for them already, especially considering people are already cozy with the MCU.
Reposting from a different thread:
Shouldn't this be rumor/speculation until its confirmed?
They don't even have confidence in other A properties, namely Wonder Woman.
If Marvel gets fucking GotG, Ant-Man and Black Panther out before we see a standalone Wonder Woman film, I don't know what to say. WB's decision making/approach seems completely reactionary and almost like they're forced into it. The key thing I don't think WB gets is that what made Avengers special was how they integrated so many of those characters we've seen and gotten to know before into one film, and they meshed. With this approach, they run the risk of a weak first impression.
Jeremy Irons as Alfred is pretty good.