Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. |OT| Tahiti is a Magical Place (to...Hey guys, I found it!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mariolee

Member
He might have just heard two gunshots a sizable time from each other and deduce that Ward gave the dog a running head start, which would be weak enough for contempt while still technically passing the test.

That seems a bit more complicated than Garrett simply finishing off the dog to teach Ward a lesson about getting attached.
 
That seems a bit more complicated than Garrett simply finishing off the dog to teach Ward a lesson about getting attached.

I don't think it's as complicated as Garrett still taking on Ward after he failed the test. I mean, he wanted someone who would be able to infiltrate SHIELD for years and come out of it unattached and capable of killing the people he'd associated with. If Ward had completely failed, I think Garrett would have just shot him rather than the dog.
 

Mariolee

Member
I don't think it's as complicated as Garrett still taking on Ward after he failed the test. I mean, he wanted someone who would be able to infiltrate SHIELD for years and come out of it unattached and capable of killing the people he'd associated with. If Ward had completely failed, I think Garrett would have just shot him rather than the dog.

What? That would be a complete waste of a good shot and five years of investment. Garrett was dying and despite Ward's compassion, Ward was still the best bet Garrett had for an apprentice.
 
Garrett may have been more forgiving if Ward had killed the dog. I think the whole point of showing that is that Ward will definitely be betrayed by Garrett for his perceived "weakness."

Garrett still got a ton of mileage out of Ward and he didn't say anything about the dog because he knew he could continue to use Ward for years if he didn't bring it up. Fitz and Simmons were the ultimate test and once Garrett sees that Ward failed at that, it's probably over for them.
 
I don't think it's as complicated as Garrett still taking on Ward after he failed the test. I mean, he wanted someone who would be able to infiltrate SHIELD for years and come out of it unattached and capable of killing the people he'd associated with. If Ward had completely failed, I think Garrett would have just shot him rather than the dog.

We're talking about a Ward who hasn't even set foot at a SHIELD facility yet. Garrett is still grooming him. The mental gymnastics you have to do to fill in the blanks of Ward goes back to shoot the dog after being shown to not do it is far more complicated than accepting that Garrett knew he wasn't going to be able to shoot the dog and use it later as a "teaching" moment psychological trigger. Garrett manipulates people.
 

Famassu

Member
We're talking about a Ward who hasn't even set foot at a SHIELD facility yet. Garrett is still grooming him. The mental gymnastics you have to do to fill in the blanks of Ward goes back to shoot the dog after being shown to not do it is far more complicated than accepting that Garrett knew he wasn't going to be able to shoot the dog and use it later as a "teaching" moment psychological trigger. Garrett manipulates people.
Mental gymnastics? We see Ward shooting the rifle earlier in the episode. We have Garrett saying Ward has incredible hand eye coordination (incredible enough to shoot a moving target as small-ish as a dog from far away). We have a scene where Ward is reminiscing about the dog incident where right as the trigger is pulled in the flashback sequence, Ward himself pulls a lever in present time to "kill" FitzSimmons. And it's not huge mental gymnastics to assume that Garrett isn't deaf and can hear two different kinds of gun shots and him not being a complete retard to understand what that means.
 

Kai Dracon

Writing a dinosaur space opera symphony
I somehow feel Ward won't die taking a shot at redemption. More that his weakness will be exposed and unable to go back to Garret or Hydra he's going to take the Long Walk: self-exile in shame eventually becoming a free agent. Possibly showing up to help the team from time to time. But never allowed back in because of his body count and bad blood. Skye will never step into the same room with him.
 
We're talking about a Ward who hasn't even set foot at a SHIELD facility yet. Garrett is still grooming him. The mental gymnastics you have to do to fill in the blanks of Ward goes back to shoot the dog after being shown to not do it is far more complicated than accepting that Garrett knew he wasn't going to be able to shoot the dog and use it later as a "teaching" moment psychological trigger. Garrett manipulates people.

This is a pretty basic show. It's primetime TV for general audiences. The juxtaposition of the dog in the scope and Ward flushing Fitzsimmons shows that he does get attached so he has to do it at a distance or not facing them.

If Garrett did it, they'd show it, and he wouldn't believe Ward when he says he crossed them off.
 

Dai101

Banned
Fury? Or the dog?

the dog is fury

Inception

lyTAA.gif
 
I'm just not sure if there's much reason for Garrett to be the shooter. We see Ward shooting the rifle earlier, using it very professionally, so I'd think it's to be assumed that Ward is behind the scope in the dog shooting scene as well. If it wasn't, I'd think it would be better storytelling to actually show Garrett shoot the dog to establish that he didn't quite trust Ward and had to take matters into his own hands instead of implying Ward shot it.

Showing Ward shooting the rifle shows us where his training is at that point and places a rifle in the scene. It's not set to make us think Ward's shooting because that could easily be accomplished by showing Ward shoot.

No, the way that part was cut implies it was Ward. He hesitated for a while and let the dog start running away, then reconsidered, fetched his rifle and shot the dog from afar. Garrett mentions Ward's incredible hand-eye coordination earlier in the episode, so in a superhero world a person like that could probably "easily" shoot a moving target as big as a dog from quite far away.

Again, there's no shot shown of him reconsidering. IF that's what they wanted to imply, they'd show him shouldering the rifle and then cut as the shot is made. Ward's hand eye coordination just shows how far his training has come at that point. It's already shown before that that Garrett is a great shot when he first returns to the forest.

As I pointed out, letting the dog go once would already be seen as soft & weak to Garrett, so that could easily be the reason why he's going on and on about Ward's weakness (+ Ward's interactions with Skye). Ward is weak enough to have a big enough moment of hesitation over a dog to let it run away, he might be so weak he'll let similar stuff happen with humans and Garrett probably wants to constantly remind Ward about it to perhaps shame him & have better control of him. If Ward is always ashamed of that moment of weakness in the eyes of his mentor, then Garrett probably thinks Ward isn't going to hesitate as easily when he has to do something similar (like he doesn't with FitzSimmons).

He first hears a hand gun being shot (i doubt he's so far he can't hear a gunshot), but Ward doesn't return to him immediately. Then he hears a rifle. 1 + 1. Garrett isn't dumb, he probably noticed Ward is attached to the dog and just put those one and one together.


He might have just heard two gunshots a sizable time from each other and deduce that Ward gave the dog a running head start, which would be weak enough for contempt while still technically passing the test.

That wouldn't be thought of as weak but as twisted. If Garrett doesn't have eyes on how exactly the whole situation plays out, the more likely assumption would be that the first shot was intended to make the dog run so that the second shot would be more difficult. Making it a game or sport. Garrett does not have feelings or empathy at that point in his life so he wouldn't assume there was a change of mind. Hell, emotionally and psychologically it makes no sense that someone would go from unable to shoot to able to shoot in the span of a few seconds without an outside force acting upon them.

To make the jump that Garrett "probably just heard both shots and assumed.." actually IS doing more mental gymnastics with the scene because it requires the viewer to come to a conclusion that they don't have the visual or audio information to come to. There's nothing there to support it in forshadow or straight forward information. Meanwhile there's plenty of forshadowing to support that Garrett is the one who has taken that shot throughout multiple episodes and very heavily throughout this single episode.

Firing a shot and abandoning the dog is quite similar to dropping Fitzsimmons off the plane at a low altitude. In both situations there's a chance at survival where making another choice would've doomed them for certain.
 

Tathanen

Get Inside Her!
To make the jump that Garrett "probably just heard both shots and assumed.." actually IS doing more mental gymnastics with the scene because it requires the viewer to come to a conclusion that they don't have the visual or audio information to come to. There's nothing there to support it in forshadow or straight forward information. Meanwhile there's plenty of forshadowing to support that Garrett is the one who has taken that shot throughout multiple episodes and very heavily throughout this single episode.

If we really occam's razor this shit, it's Ward behind the gunsight. Because that's what the flashback was to. Ward was gonna shoot the dog, he didn't, so we think he'll save FitzSimmons. But then it turns out he's not saving them, and we cut back to the dog, in the gun's sights. It's a 1:1 parallel. Now if they aren't SHOWING who's behind that sight, the easiest assumption is that it's "obvious" who's behind it. Namely, it's the guy who's having a flashback, and who just pointed a gun at the dog, and who just decided to jettison FitzSimmons. If they wanted to say it was Garrett shooting the dog, they would have shown Garrett behind the gun. Instead, they showed nobody. The only thing we can reasonably infer from the information presented solely in that scene is that it's Ward.

The argument that since Garrett uses the same line on him he's holding something over his head is flawed. He wants FitzSimmons dead, he's not gonna use the same line that didn't result in Ward killing the dog to try and get him to kill his friends. To the contrary, he's using it to reinforce the fact that hey, Ward, kill these people just like you killed that dog. Remember, you are not weak.
 
Ward as irredeemably evil is boring.

Ward as conflicted and essentially a grey area character is far more interesting.

Yep, it's the best thing they could have done with him. I'm just really hoping he doesn't get offed next week, because he's the kind of character I want to see built up over the series due to his history with the team and Hydra.

I'm thinking he and Reina are going to escape together after Garrett gets taken out by the team and Fury and do their own thing, sometimes helping and sometimes hurting the team depending on the circumstances. She doesn't seem like she jives with Garrett's plans as much and was only in it for the research.
 
Ward as irredeemably evil is boring.

Ward as conflicted and essentially a grey area character is far more interesting.

No matter how grey he is, how do you redeem a man who willingly murdered multiple SHIELD agents including top brass, and assisted in the destruction of SHIELD, helped to free dozens (if not hundreds) of dangerous metahuman prisoners, and is currently working with a murderously insane terrorist organization?
 
No matter how grey he is, how do you redeem a man who willingly murdered multiple SHIELD agents including top brass, and assisted in the destruction of SHIELD, helped to free dozens (if not hundreds) of dangerous metahuman prisoners, and is currently working with a murderously insane terrorist organization?

It's basically out of the realm of possibility. There have been a few things in this show that I've let slide because it wasn't a huge deal.

I don't think they'll attempt it but if they do find some way to "redeem" ward and bring him back to the team, that would be a dealbreaker. It's not like fuckin' DBZ with Vegeta. The guy's a sociopath.
 
If we really occam's razor this shit, it's Ward behind the gunsight. Because that's what the flashback was to. Ward was gonna shoot the dog, he didn't, so we think he'll save FitzSimmons. But then it turns out he's not saving them, and we cut back to the dog, in the gun's sights. It's a 1:1 parallel. Now if they aren't SHOWING who's behind that sight, the easiest assumption is that it's "obvious" who's behind it. Namely, it's the guy who's having a flashback, and who just pointed a gun at the dog, and who just decided to jettison FitzSimmons. If they wanted to say it was Garrett shooting the dog, they would have shown Garrett behind the gun. Instead, they showed nobody. The only thing we can reasonably infer from the information presented solely in that scene is that it's Ward.

So you're suggesting, despite that particular flashback being moment by moment.. it suddenly jumps an unknown amount of time to allow Ward to stop crying, run over to his rifle, acquire the dog at a completely different angle than the direction the dog ran off in to then shoot him. It's also not a 1:1 Parallel in your example because Ward wasn't in a position to save Fitzsimmons. Last Ward had seen, Garrett was still alive and able to repair himself. There's also a plane full of Garretts men. Even if Ward was capable of taking all of them out himself, he couldn't do so while protecting Fitzsimmons.

Meanwhile throughout the entire episode Garrett is shown as teaching the ideal of trust no one or it will lead to your death and ALL of his lessons are taught the hard way. The logic that Ward is the one having the flashback, so it must be through his eyes is flawed because none of the flashback is shown through his eyes up to that point. It's his memory of the events but always an outside view of the scenes.

The argument that since Garrett uses the same line on him he's holding something over his head is flawed. He wants FitzSimmons dead, he's not gonna use the same line that didn't result in Ward killing the dog to try and get him to kill his friends. To the contrary, he's using it to reinforce the fact that hey, Ward, kill these people just like you killed that dog. Remember, you are not weak.

It's not about it being the same line. It's the constant references to Ward being weak. In a previous episode "Providence," Garrett tells Ward that since he knows Ward cares about her, to get the information without breaking his SHIELD cover. If she doesn't reveal it after 24 hours, he's to eliminate the team and bring Skye to Garrett. He also sends Deathlok to shadow Ward because he doesn't trust that Ward will actually bring Skye back. This supports the idea that Ward has a weakness for those he grows attached to. Earlier in Providence when talking about the team, Garrett also says "It would've been easier if I just gave you kill order in the first week" to which Ward replies, "But you didn't." Hell, right before he pulls the lever Fitz says "I know you care about us Ward!" and Ward whispers, "You're right. I do. It's a weakness." And he stares sadly at the compartment as it's ejected. Once again reaffirming that Ward's attachments have always been a weak point for him. He didn't get cold and resolved. He showed emotion, just as he did when he fired into the air to send the dog off running.

Garrett's repeating of the same lines throughout the flashback and in the present are meant to show how resolved he is. He's rigid and unchanging. His experience being abandoned in the field is the entirety of what he's become now. His attempt at forging Ward to be like him hasn't taken. Ward still has his "weakness" in those he cares for.
 
Ward isn't really giving FitzSimmons a chance, though. In fact, given that crate is going to sink to the bottom of the ocean, has a limited supply of oxygen, and may or may not be watertight, he's giving them a more prolonged death. He has no way of knowing they have a beacon thing with them and even if they were to get out of the crate before it sank, they're in the middle of the ocean and nobody knows they're out there. Their chance of surviving this is about as minimal as the dog's chance of outrunning a bullet.
 
Ward isn't really giving FitzSimmons a chance, though. In fact, given that crate is going to sink to the bottom of the ocean, has a limited supply of oxygen, and may or may not be watertight, he's giving them a more prolonged death. He has no way of knowing they have a beacon thing with them and even if they were to get out of the crate before it sank, they're in the middle of the ocean and nobody knows they're out there. Their chance of surviving this is about as minimal as the dog's chance of outrunning a bullet.

Well they have control of the door, so in theory they should be able to leave the container if they wanted to but, yes, it's a slim chance of survival. I imagine leaving a dog who's used to relying on it's master for food and water out in the wilderness is also a pretty slim chance to survive.
 
Well they have control of the door, so in theory they should be able to leave the container if they wanted to but, yes, it's a slim chance of survival. I imagine leaving a dog who's used to relying on it's master for food and water out in the wilderness is also a pretty slim chance to survive.

That was Garrett's dog. Pretty sure it knew how to survive on its own. It had a better chance than Fitz and Simmons out in the middle of the ocean. Hypothermia/drowning in a few hours versus possible starvation in a few weeks.
 
That was Garrett's dog. Pretty sure it knew how to survive on its own. It had a better chance than Fitz and Simmons out in the middle of the ocean. Hypothermia/drowning in a few hours versus possible starvation in a few weeks.

It's a trained retriever, not a wild dog. It wouldn't know how to survive out there. Though with nearby cabins there's a chance he could've come across other humans at some point. Still it's a slim chance in both instances.
 

Trike

Member
Fitz and Simmons might have some equipment on them to be tracked. Or the container can send out a beacon. Maybe it will float?
 

Anoregon

The flight plan I just filed with the agency list me, my men, Dr. Pavel here. But only one of you!
I'm just glad they didn't do the stupid thing and show FitzSimmons in the preview for the season finale

True, but let's be real. There is absolutely no chance they don't get rescued within the first 10 minutes of next week.
 
No matter how grey he is, how do you redeem a man who willingly murdered multiple SHIELD agents including top brass, and assisted in the destruction of SHIELD, helped to free dozens (if not hundreds) of dangerous metahuman prisoners, and is currently working with a murderously insane terrorist organization?

Darth Vader killed the Emperor. Was that not considered redemption on some level even though he murdered all those younglings a while back?
 

Anoregon

The flight plan I just filed with the agency list me, my men, Dr. Pavel here. But only one of you!
Darth Vader killed the Emperor. Was that not considered redemption on some level even though he murdered all those younglings a while back?

Yeah but that's totally different, because when he was young and stupid he was totally manipulated by an older father-figure who offered to save him from his greatest fear and-

oh.
 

pants

Member
Coulson murdered SHIELD people.

Yeah, most of the people in this show are grey. Skye although having a golden heart has been shown to not be scared to use criminal activity to further her cause, May would betray the confidence of her closest friend in the name of getting the job done, Coulson is willing to break into places and end peoples lives in order to save people he cares about. No one is ever black and white, and the thing I like most about this show is the vast spectrum of grey on display. Although both grey morally, you'd be hard pressed to cast Ward and Coulson as the same shade for example.

As I said before, a shield show should be exactly that, grey.
 
Wouldn't all of Triplett's equipement be fried when the EPM was used accidently near the beginning of the episode? I would assume that it is all shielded from the EPM charge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom