I considered that and if they had simply shown the dudes running through the mountain with a Ginger counter showing 0 i'd have no problem. But, in the film, they showed the MUTOS directly eating missiles and radioactive stuff. The male's cacoon was directly attached to the old power plant. I'm just going by what they chose to show us on screen.
Fucking loved this movie. The audio in IMAX was glorious! Can't wait for the Blu-ray so I can blast it in my home theater.
I thought you were better than this Ducky :'(
That charge up from the tail to the almighty atomic breath...so good.
Like in Pac Rim, where was the Kaiju slicing sword the entire time?
I thought this was a good thing instead of a bad thing.
To have villains with depth and motivation for their actions is surely more interesting than them being just villains for villanys sake.
During the opening narration it's briefly shown that Kaiju blood is highly toxic, hence the reliance on blunt force trauma.
Would King Kong for the sequel work?
lol
The sequel needs to be called something with Versus. I dont care what monster, just make it a Versus title.
Just saw it.
The first half I thought was pretty bad, but enjoyably so. I lovehow the American Navy just lands in Japan and is all like "We're taking over now!"
Just saw it. I really liked it, didnt love it.
The group i was with was split. Some disliked it and felt it was really illogical. Me and others really enjoyed it for what it was. I was hoping from more for Edwards but in thinking back i actually think its an achievement he did what he did given the nature of the Godzilla story is so absurd anyway.
Visuals were amazing. Some of the sequences felt like a big budget Spielberg movie.
Im glad a sequel is being made.
That is a great way to describe the feel of the visual style. Edwards did a great job following in Spielberg's ability to add a real sense of weight and presence to his creatures.
The King Kong from the original, or Peter Jackson's remake, would last about 6 seconds against this film's Godzilla, and 5 of those are Godzilla raising his foot.
Give him some tools to work with lol
![]()
![]()
James Rolfe's opinions on the film.
http://cinemassacre.com/2014/05/17/godzilla-2014-thoughts/
I was looking back at the first couple of trailers released and it looks like there was either supposed to be another monster or they had a different design for the MUTO. It also seemed like the film would be much darker.
Heres the link
http://paranormalpopculture.com/2013/12/leaked-godzilla-teaser-trailer.html
Yeah also the Kong Kong from the older movies was about the same size as Godzilla... But this Godzilla is fucking huge so they'd have to make a Mega king kong to even be fair.The King Kong from the original, or Peter Jackson's remake, would last about 6 seconds against this film's Godzilla, and 5 of those are Godzilla raising his foot.
I was looking back at the first couple of trailers released and it looks like there was either supposed to be another monster or they had a different design for the MUTO. It also seemed like the film would be much darker.
Heres the link
http://paranormalpopculture.com/2013/12/leaked-godzilla-teaser-trailer.html
Yuss! They better get Ghidorah in it! He's not my favorite kaiju, but he's basically Godzilla's main nemesis. Come on Gareth!in related news...the sequel to this Godzilla film is already in the works! http://www.deadline.com/2014/05/godzilla-2-sequel-warner-bros-legendary-gareth-edwards/
After sitting a bit on it, I think the film hits a real chord for us folks that experienced the 2011 Earthquake in Japan both from a disaster viewpoint and a nuclear one. The early and middle parts reminded me of how it felt sitting at home watching the reports of what happened and how talking about how everyone else felt about the events. The tsunami, the power plant, and all of that felt eerily there even if it wasn't connected and it having monsters, of course. it felt like it paid the proper respects while doing it too. My point earlier in the thread about entering the film yourself and experiencing it felt on point, I thought. I just didn't realize how much of my own experiences it really drew out. A lot of folks have never faced these things, let alone in the vicinity of all 3 at once.
That's fascinating. What a interesting perspective
I think that's part of the reason why I feel this movie is so much better than people are saying. A lot of the complaints seem so nitpicky to me. Like sure the characters are shallow but they aren't meant to have this deep, individual plot line in the film. Everything is shot from the perspective of someone at the ground level of it all and it's their responses to this as a proxy for us that's kind of the point and what makes the first parts so good. And more so than disaster-flicks, they want you to be in there to be a part of it I think. The scale is so much smaller but it felt so much more real.
I think that's part of the reason why I feel this movie is so much better than people are saying. A lot of the complaints seem so nitpicky to me. Like sure the characters are shallow but they aren't meant to have this deep, individual plot line in the film. Everything is shot from the perspective of someone at the ground level of it all and it's their responses to this as a proxy for us that's kind of the point and what makes the first parts so good. And more so than disaster-flicks, they want you to be in there to be a part of it I think. The scale is so much smaller but it felt so much more real.
Checking this out tonight. 3d any good?
Usually don't care for it but the friend I'm going with is always picking the 3d showings and I usually feel the extra bit for admission isn't worth it.
Well, that right there isn't nitpicky, just exaggeration.EDIT: 80% of the movie was a boring slog, the reasons being numerous and frequent. I don't see how that's "nitpicky" to me.
Checking this out tonight. 3d any good?
Usually don't care for it but the friend I'm going with is always picking the 3d showings and I usually feel the extra bit for admission isn't worth it.
Well, that right there isn't nitpicky, just exaggeration.
40 minutes or so are Bryan Cranston, which I assume most everybody related to. The finale takes up at a half hour. That's over 50% of the movie right there.
Yuss! They better get Ghidorah in it! He's not my favorite kaiju, but he's basically Godzilla's main nemesis. Come on Gareth!
You're right, 80% is exaggeration, but literally every other human scene other than any of the ones Cranston appears in did absolutely nothing for me. Whatever the actual minute count was, it was far too much and took up the center spotlight when it shouldn't have. Whatever percentage it was, it's a big chunk of the movie and it just isn't a "nitpick" as far as I'm concerned.
Eh, I simply disagree. I experienced a major earthquake as a kid (albeit not in Japan) and I had a deep, raw fear of shit going down and absolutely everyone I knew was powerless to do anything.
This film didn't even come close to hitting that same chord for me. None of the characters who watched things go down reacted in any way that I anticipated or would've expected them to. "Mommy, look" "oh my what's this on tv?" isn't my idea of the kid's or mother's reactions, sorry.
EDIT: 80% of the movie was a boring slog, the reasons being numerous and frequent. I don't see how that's "nitpicky" to me.
Right, and that's fair, but there's more to what happens in a movie than just the characters. The plot of the film is great, with something new, some twist, happening most of the time. It moves forward at a rapid pace, and before you know it you've gone from. Both times I could hardly believe two hours had passed.Cranston to the finale
You may have had experienced a quake as a kid but it wasn't recent like the 2011 Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear power plant scare in Japan.
And I disagree, a lot of the complaints are either nitpicky or totally different expectations.
I don't know what else to tell you other than it felt overly long to me, and nothing of importance felt like it happened betweenandthe reveal in HawaiiBetween those two the plot of the movie was literally justthe final fight in San Francisco.oh shit they're going to fight in SF. Which is fine except they fell absolutely flat in selling the sense of fear and urgency. I felt nothing. I was just waiting for the fight to actually start, the movie on the way there wasn't entertaining me at all.
-Was disappointed with where they went with the human element in the 2nd half.They had this whole bad father/redemption/revenge thing going with Cranston, who was killing it, and it was pretty good stuff. They then proceeded to unceremoniously dump some cranes on him in favor of ooraah ooraah military meathead husband and some other rather poorly wrought stuff with the wife and kid. Not that this angle was particularly bad, in fact it was pretty serviceable and was mixed well with the Godzilla stuff happening, its just that it falls flat in the face of what Cranston was providing. You're trying to do this human drama against the backdrop of mega monsters, yet you kill off the best actor in the film and relegate Ken Watanabe to a few one liners and some anti-atomic sentiment rather than explaining his reasons for chasing Godzilla all those years. I'm assuming some they made a decision during re-writes that they needed a more time spent on the fresh faced actors and the military, because Cranston's death and the tonal changes were very abrupt.