Again. Totally cool with that.
So I'm guessing you are a pretty violent person?
Again. Totally cool with that.
The thing is, why would someone just suddenly come at you with a knife or a baseball bat? Maybe some robbers, but even in those situations it's better to just give them what they want (money, phone etc.) than start to shoot people (you never know, they might have guns of their own and if, say, you'd be with family or friends, things could just go down a bad path). And the thing about shooting people is, you'd have to carry a gun around and carrying a gun around is stupidity and pretty much never leads to anything good.You clearly misunderstand the meaning of the word "threat". Did you even read what I wrote? Because I could have sworn I stated very clearly that someone hitting me is not a threat, it's an annoyance. Someone talking shit or acting "threatening" is not a threat. Someone coming at me with a knife or a baseball bat... that's a threat. Learn the difference before you open your mouth next time.
So I'm guessing you are a pretty violent person?
Just once in grade school. Got into a argument with a girl and said something she didn't like very much. She hit me a few times with half slaps/half punches. I was able to pin her against the wall until the teachers came. Apparently I was being sexist dick for not slugging her back but I'm cool with that.
No? What gives you that idea?
Okay. I'll just stick to reading your tag. I'm not getting into that argument.The thing is, why would someone just suddenly come at you with a knife or a baseball bat? Maybe some robbers, but even in those situations it's better to just give them what they want (money, phone etc.) than start to shoot people (you never know, they might have guns of their own and if, say, you'd be with family or friends, things could just go down a bad path). And the thing about shooting people is, you'd have to carry a gun around and carrying a gun around is stupidity and pretty much never leads to anything good.
Other than some total lunatics and the robbers mentioned above, usually people are provoked into using knives & baseball bats. Again, it's better to try to get out of any & every threatening situation without any violence to escalate things, because usually violence just breeds more violence (you beat up that "annoyance" who is of "no threat" to you, then that guy gets the knife out of his/her pocket or goes to get that knife and comes back, maybe with friends).
None of this has anything to do with Solange and Jay-Z in the Met ball lift, but that's the point. Context becomes important when people start pondering simplistically: "Well, what if it had been a man attacking a woman?" and absurdly leave it at that. In truth, you'd have to take into account obvious physical differences between the sexes generally, and the individuals in particular, not to mention the surrounding culture of patriarchy/entitlement and violence against and subjugation of women.
This is why Solange's attack wasn't disturbing or meaningful in the same way that it would have been if she'd been attacked by a male. Ideally, no one should be attacking someone else. However, the fact that women have always had far more reason to be physically afraid of male violence, rather than vice versa, is hardly news. While female violence gets a disproportionate amount of attention, it's male violence that remains dominant.
Good article
It doesn't do what you think it does though. It's not suggesting that Jay's reaction was "perpetuating a harmful sexist norm", but explaining why Solange's actions are tolerated and why Jay-Z's would not if the situation was reversed
It also criticizes exactly what you and Goldberg are doing. Criticizing the situation solely based on gender and ignoring context.
Thanks for sharing this
A female from another unit blamed me for her bf getting kicked out of the Army for smoking weed. She came after me and I had to grab her wrists and physically shove her outside my room and locked the door while this madwoman tried to kick down my front door for a few minutes before giving up. Thankfully she was maybe 120 lbs and not very accurate with her kicks or I'd be missing a testicle or two. Apparently she tried to tell people I hit her cus of some nasty bruises on her wrists but was lucky and had plenty of witnesses who saw and heard the entire thing.How many people have actually been assaulted by a woman? How did you react? There have been a few stories in this thread, and they're way more interesting than arguing endlessly heightened hypotheticals or binary trains of thought.
That you think it is ok to violently attack men?
haha what?No, I didn't say it was okay to violently attack men! Where did that come from?
haha what?No, I didn't say it was okay to violently attack men! Where did that come from?
No... If you're willing to hit a man sharing the same physical attributes but not the woman then that is the very definition of sexism.
Ah okay good people of GAF. I am sexist then. I'll just have to deal with that.
I'm not wrong, though. Violence should be the absolute last resort and shooting people not an option at all. That you are so readily willing to shoot a person just isn't normal.Okay. I'll just stick to reading your tag. I'm not getting into that argument.
haha what?No, I didn't say it was okay to violently attack men! Where did that come from?
The spins in this thread.
Instead of criticizing people for hitting women in situations like the one you were in, they're criticizing you based on the premise that if it was a guy, that had the same weight and physical strength as the female you held down, you would have hit him without thinking twice.
Which logically, isn't a wrong conclusion. The problem is that they're putting words in your mouth to get there and from there draw the conclusion that it is better to hit men and women equally, rather than try to convince people to not hit men in the same situations that they wouldn't hit women.
I have. She wasn't drunk, she just wanted to prove she was some badass or something. She was around my size and weight (5'7"/120 ish lbs) and probably stronger than me since I don't lift. I had no problem fighting since she wanted to start shit. Fight ended in a draw, although technically I lost since I admitted defeat to end the fight. She only made the offer because her finger was about to be severed in my mouth.How many people have actually been assaulted by a woman? How did you react? There have been a few stories in this thread, and they're way more interesting than arguing endlessly heightened hypotheticals or binary trains of thought.
The spins in this thread.
Instead of criticizing people for hitting women in situations like the one you were in, they're criticizing you based on the premise that if it was a guy, that had the same weight and physical strength as the female you held down, you would have hit him without thinking twice.
Which logically, isn't a wrong conclusion. The problem is that they're putting words in your mouth to get there and from there draw the conclusion that it is better to hit men and women equally, rather than try to convince people to not hit men in the same situations that they wouldn't hit women.
That is exactly what I am arguing in this thread. I'm not saying you should hit a woman the same way you would a man(except under extenuating circumstances which considers life or death) I'm saying that you should treat weak men the same way you treat weak women: try to diffuse the situation without physically aggressive actions.
That's where you say it's OK to hit men. 2nd post responding to 1st here, of course.
You just admitted that if some weak guy were to start assaulting you your response would be dramatically different from if a women were assaulting you, assuming they had the same physical strength. You dont take into account the damage that you could do to the guy but only think about dealing out retribution.
I have. She wasn't drunk, she just wanted to prove she was some badass or something. She was around my size and weight (5'7"/120 ish lbs) and probably stronger than me since I don't lift. I had no problem fighting since she wanted to start shit. Fight ended in a draw, although technically I lost since I admitted defeat to end the fight. She only made the offer because her finger was about to be severed in my mouth.
I 100% agree. It's sexist to think only women can hit men. I'm reminded of that video recently where the cops tackled the guy who was being hit by the crazed woman on the train.
You're different than some of the other people I've been arguing with in this thread, who have gone so far to say that it would have been better if Jay-Z had hit Solange in this specific situation, than to react the way he did and "perpetuate sexist norms"
So I'm guessing you are a pretty violent person?
That you think it is ok to violently attack men?
No, you'd be a sexist dick for not treating both genders the same way.
Well, as long as you know you're perpetuating sexist norms.
It's really weird to see so many loaded questions and attempts at traps and whatever in this thread. Do you actually care about the sexism, or do you just want to win Internet fights?
and it is also wrong if this big dude lays out a scrawny man. That this is about sex is what is wrong with the discussion at hand. I would treat any potential threat to my safety the same way regardless of gender. If some scrawny guy attacks me with his weak little punches I won't lay him out (even though I could). I would treat a male assailant that poses the same threat as a female assailant in the same way period. That it is okay for me to lay out a much weaker guy is wrong.
The reason we bring this up is that equal threats are not being handled equally, ergo sexism. I am not saying it is right to hit a smaller weaker woman, I am saying it is wrong to hit a smaller weaker person.
The thing is, why would someone just suddenly come at you with a knife or a baseball bat? Maybe some robbers, but even in those situations it's better to just give them what they want (money, phone etc.) than start to shoot people (you never know, they might have guns of their own and if, say, you'd be with family or friends, things could just go down a bad path). And the thing about shooting people is, you'd have to carry a gun around and carrying a gun around is stupidity and pretty much never leads to anything good.
Other than some total lunatics and the robbers mentioned above, usually people are provoked into using knives & baseball bats. Again, it's better to try to get out of any & every threatening situation without any violence to escalate things, because usually violence just breeds more violence (you beat up that "annoyance" who is of "no threat" to you, then that guy gets the knife out of his/her pocket or goes to get that knife and comes back, maybe with friends).
is it ok to hit a man who identifies as a women?
Well my question was sincere, but now I guess it's just rhetorical.You are really going to go after me for this when you were conjecturing earlier in the thread that people arguing for Whoopi were fetishizing violence against women?
I hate to say it but you just sound really bitter. Maybe you need to take a break from the thread?
You are really going to go after me for this when you were conjecturing earlier in the thread that people arguing for Whoopi were fetishizing violence against women?
I hate to say it but you just sound really bitter. Maybe you need to take a break from the thread?
No. I did not say it was OK to hit men. I said I personally would not strike a woman. I never said anything about men. The stuff about men was said by other people putting words into my mouth.I just didn't bother arguing about it which I guess makes you think I agreed with what was said.
If all things are equal in a confrontation (size difference, strength, etc) and you'd need to hit the person that is attacking you in order to escape, not hitting a woman *because* she's a woman is in fact sexist.
Ah okay good people of GAF. I am sexist then. I'll just have to deal with that.
No, it doesn't.Our society thinks it's ok for a large man to go to town a significantly smaller man.
Yes, it does.No, it doesn't.
Well my question was sincere, but now I guess it's just rhetorical.
The problem is that you are ignoring the elephant in the room, which is that most women are not physically equal to most men. I'm not saying men's bodies are better. They can't get pregnant, can't nourish a baby, have lower life expectancy, etc. But in terms of brute strength, males more often than not have the advantage.
Did Jay-Z get injured by Solange? No. Would Solange have gotten injured if Jay-Z hit back? I don't know but I'm glad we didn't find out.
The problem is that you are ignoring the elephant in the room, which is that most women are not physically equal to most men. I'm not saying men's bodies are better. They can't get pregnant, can't nourish a baby, have lower life expectancy, etc. But in terms of brute strength, males more often than not have the advantage.
Did Jay-Z get injured by Solange? No. Would Solange have gotten injured if Jay-Z hit back? I don't know but I'm glad we didn't find out.
Not so harmful that I think it's worth justifying more destructive and tangible behavior in order to do away with it.
If this was a thread about a world star hip hop video where a larger muscular guy beats a 90 pound skinny dude half to death for pushing him, and everyone was saying "He had it coming" I'd 100% be on your side.
but in the context of this thread, I can't get behind what you're trying to advocate here. You're justifying PHYSICAL VIOLENCE against a weaker party to challenge a social norm that played a factor in deterring it.
That's absolutely ridiculous to me.
But literally no one is arguing that women should be absolved from physical retaliation. The "never ever hit a woman" argument is a straw man of the actual arguments being made.
I'm interested in this.You clearly haven't read this thread. Do you want me to quote them for you?