Hatty
Member
I can't wait for the nerd meltdowns about it being called 10.10 instead of 11.0.
nerds tend to realize the difference between versioning and decimals
I can't wait for the nerd meltdowns about it being called 10.10 instead of 11.0.
Did we get sales numbers for the Surface 2? Hard to even use the Surface 1 as justification considering how limited it's deployment was in general because they decided to not to open it up to all retailers.Why would Apple make a competitor to a device almost no one buys?
That's not what WWDC is for. This'll be about iOS 8 and OS X 10.10.
No, they're the ones most stubborn about accepting it. They know the difference, they just don't like it.nerds tend to realize the difference between versioning and decimals
September... probably... well, definitely, but maybe probably. I dunno. September.When does the iPhone get announced?
I think it's more that these people think OS X is "old" and "outdated" and needs to be replaced with something more modern, even though OS X IS the most modern OS there is. Even Windows 8 isn't as modern. They just want change and think that 10.10 warrants a jump to a new OS architecture, which it doesn't. Let them get pissy. There's no reason for a new architecture. OS X can't get anymore modern than it is.No, they're the ones most stubborn about accepting it. They know the difference, they just don't like it.
I hate to bump this just to ask, but when will the official WWDC 2014 thread be going up? There's less than two weeks left.
Also, will the keynote be on Monday the 2nd? I'll probably want to request it off for no reason at all other than to sit around reading live blogs and the GAF thread for 2 hours.
September... probably... well, definitely, but maybe probably. I dunno. September.
Right.No, they're the ones most stubborn about accepting it. They know the difference, they just don't like it.
Wrong.I think it's more that these people think OS X is "old" and "outdated" and needs to be replaced with something more modern, even though OS X IS the most modern OS there is. Even Windows 8 isn't as modern. They just want change and think that 10.10 warrants a jump to a new OS architecture, which it doesn't. Let them get pissy. There's no reason for a new architecture. OS X can't get anymore modern than it is.
What they want however is a new UI, or UI overhaul. Which is what we're getting. A name change we don't need. It's an arbitrary thing and doesn't need to be done. 10.10 will be fine enough without having to be named OS XI.
If iOS finally gets a FilePicker/non-top-heavy filesystem it'll be great but I appreciate that that involves solving some security/usability issues.not expecting any shocks, but I look forward to some of the new APIs and goodies that we'll get to muck with.
iPod Classic SSD.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I know I'm dreaming. Forget I ever posted that.
iPod Classic SSD.
So what do you want? You want them to change the name just because? The X stands for Unix. It's the Mac OS now. It's no longer associated with a version number. And the typical version naming system died the day Google started releasing new whole numbers every 6 months. We don't need an XI. Nor do we need an 11.0. Unless some brand new architecture comes along. But it doesn't need to. Because OS X is already damn perfect as it is foundation-wise. It can easily be built upon without needing a whole rewrite. If they ever called it "Eleven" then it'd be purely branding just to shut people the hell up.Wrong.
'They' are design/usability nerds. They know the difference but they expect their older relatives/the mass market might find it confusing. They've spent the past decade laughing at Microsoft's mistakes with naming products and are concerned Apple might make a misstep. A name change when appropriate is the seemingly arbitrary little detail that Apple usually takes pains to get right. That's what Apple's reputation is built on anyway.
'They' not me. I don't care much either way.So what do you want? You want them to change the name just because?
We're talking about software. And while Apple has popularized high end hardware over the past decade, their software foundations have barely changed still based on NextStep, WIMP, iOS app icons. Apple is very slow to do software changes (heck they haven't even improved the keyboard since iPhone OS 1.0. Microsoft and Google have made more risky radical improvements to their respective platforms in the past few yearsBegin possibly unrelated rant so don't take it personally if it isn't relevant to what you're talking about, it's just a stream of consciousness:
They've laughed at Microsoft for years because unlike Apple, they refuse to dump a lot of old legacy stuff in order to keep corporations and crusty old users from complaining that their old 20 year old software and hardware doesn't work anymore... I'd rather Apple move on and push technology forward unlike Microsoft and PC makers who still put clunky legacy ports on many of their machines. Remember how long it took for the floppy to die? And has it even completely died yet?
They do have a pretty good predictive selection system in place for some keyboards, like the Chinese keyboard (which evolved from something that initially looked like the current English prediction system), so it's easy to put it in for English, if they wanted to.NeXTStep and WIMP are all I want in a desktop OS. I'd hate if Apple decided Microsoft was doing the right thing and tried to shoehorn actual iOS functionality into the OS instead of gradually implementing features that make sense and still work on a desktop OS like they should. Like Notification Center and LaunchPad.
As for the iOS keyboard, the one thing I'd love to see is the Android-like list of word options that appears above the keyboard as you type. All we get is occasional single option auto-completions or corrections. The rest of the keyboard I have no problem with.
What risky changes have Google and Microsoft made? Besides shoehorning a touch interface into Windows in a time when not every PC has a touchscreen. (Microsoft) Or releasing an entire platform based on a web browser and nothing else with nothing at all related to the other OS platform they already have. (Google) Both of which I believe are struggling pretty hard relatively.
LaunchPad is exactly what Apple should not bringing over from iOS: a useless icon grid. Mac OS X notification center is a horrible hidden away thing. I don't use it and many of the mainstream folks (in my experience) don't even know it exists.NeXTStep and WIMP are all I want in a desktop OS. I'd hate if Apple decided Microsoft was doing the right thing and tried to shoehorn actual iOS functionality into the OS instead of gradually implementing features that make sense and still work on a desktop OS like they should. Like Notification Center and LaunchPad.
As for the iOS keyboard, the one thing I'd love to see is the Android-like list of word options that appears above the keyboard as you type. All we get is occasional single option auto-completions or corrections. The rest of the keyboard I have no problem with.
There was actually some half finished code for the auto predictive found in iOS5 iirc. Anyway swiping keyboards (and some form of quick cursor control) are huge improvements over the iOS keyboard. Whether you appreciate them or not, mobile keyboards have been evolving but Apple's iOS keyboard hasn't.They do have a pretty good predictive selection system in place for some keyboards, like the Chinese keyboard (which evolved from something that initially looked like the current English prediction system), so it's easy to put it in for English, if they wanted to.
What risky changes have Google and Microsoft made? Besides shoehorning a touch interface into Windows in a time when not every PC has a touchscreen. (Microsoft) Or releasing an entire platform based on a web browser and nothing else with nothing at all related to the other OS platform they already have. (Google) Both of which I believe are struggling pretty hard relatively.
Begin possibly unrelated rant so don't take it personally if it isn't relevant to what you're talking about, it's just a stream of consciousness:
They've laughed at Microsoft for years because unlike Apple, they refuse to dump a lot of old legacy stuff in order to keep corporations and crusty old users from complaining that their old 20 year old software and hardware doesn't work anymore. Thankfully Apple has handled these transitions so well numerous times. Sure there's still complainers but they are just whiners and most of them eventually just find new software/hardware, buy a new machine, switch to Windows or just stick with what they have. The rest can complain all they want. I'd rather Apple move on and push technology forward unlike Microsoft and PC makers who still put clunky legacy ports on many of their machines. Remember how long it took for the floppy to die? And has it even completely died yet? It's been 16 years. I've seen new PCs with VGA ports on them. VGA. Instead of something modern like DVI. Why? Because a lot of users are still clinging to their older monitors and can't be arsed to buy an adapter if needed so just keep the old port, why not. Note: The opinions expressed by The Real Abed do not represent the opinions of a typical PC/Mac user. This is a paid advertisement. Quality guaranteed or your money back.
Huh. That's an interesting observation that I've never had a chance to observe for myself yet. I use Notification Center in OS X all the time, but I'm not exactly a mainstream user.LaunchPad is exactly what Apple should not bringing over from iOS: a useless icon grid. Mac OS X notification center is a horrible hidden away thing. I don't use it and many of the mainstream folks (in my experience) don't even know it exists.
I use both features extensively. Especially LaunchPad. So much better than a folder in your Dock. And NC may have problems but it's very useful for me. Very useful. I sometimes feel like I'm the only one who uses OS X's new features instead of complaining that they're useless. I even use Fullscreen ALL THE TIME but keep hearing people talk about how they prefer windows all over one screen. I never used multiple desktops when they were called Screens, and nor do I use multiple Desktop screens, but I put every app I can in Fullscreen. I can't live without it. How is a grid of application icons "useless"? Can you not click them? Do they not launch the app when you do? Seems to me this is full of use. I dumped DragThing the day they implemented it after having faithfully used it for 10 years. That's how useful it is to me. All these iOS features that Apple has put in OS X have completely enhanced my workflow. I've even used the Maps app once or twice to plan a route. Also, Emoji support is 😄😎😈👍👏❤️💋💣LaunchPad is exactly what Apple should not bringing over from iOS: a useless icon grid. Mac OS X notification center is a horrible hidden away thing. I don't use it and many of the mainstream folks (in my experience) don't even know it exists.
I never said they didn't. What are you on about, silly?And huh?! Windows does have a "Notification Center and LaunchPad". It's the Metro Start Screen and Live Tiles are an innovative UI that Microsoft introduced.
Technically, notification center is used everytime you receive an email.
All you people who find LaunchPad useless, are you using Magic Trackpads or mice? Because it's indispensable on my MTP with the pinch gesture and ability to type a name, press an arrow key or mouse to the icon I want.
It's a hell of a lot more convenient than an Apps folder in the Dock.
Though you can also just use Spotlight or if you want, Alfred or whatever it's called. I prefer LaunchPad McQuack.
Expect a completely redesigned version of OS X (numbered 10.10) plus an enhancement filled iOS 8 with new Healthbook fitness tracking software, improved Maps, and new iPad features. Also, according to sources, Apple is planning to unveil new hardware at this years conference. New products from Apple TVs to iWatches to Retina MacBook Airs (the most likely) have been rumored for introduction this year.
Where's that new thread?!
Apple confirms WWDC 2014 keynote to be held Monday, June 2nd at 10 AM PT; new hardware likely | 9to5Mac (May 21st)
The previous rumor for Retina MBA said "late 2014", and Intel's chips have been confirmed delayed, so I don't think it's the most likely. Which leaves Apple TVs, iWatches and Mac mini. Apple doesn't care about mac minis enough to announce it at wwdc and any new Apple TV would be around the same time as a new iOS release imo. So iWatches (unveiled at WWDC and released in the Fall)?
CMD+Spacebar for launchpad all day everyday. It's how I open pretty much every single thing on my MBP outside of Safari when I first wake it.
Where's that new thread?!
Apple confirms WWDC 2014 keynote to be held Monday, June 2nd at 10 AM PT; new hardware likely | 9to5Mac (May 21st)
The previous rumor for Retina MBA said "late 2014", and Intel's chips have been confirmed delayed, so I don't think it's the most likely. Which leaves Apple TVs, iWatches and Mac mini. Apple doesn't care about mac minis enough to announce it at wwdc and any new Apple TV would be around the same time as a new iOS release imo. So iWatches (unveiled at WWDC and released in the Fall)?
New hardware? Gimme that super light 12" retina display MacBook air. I hope that thing exists.
New hardware? Gimme that super light 12" retina display MacBook air. I hope that thing exists.
Almost finished with itWhere's that new thread?!
Apple confirms WWDC 2014 keynote to be held Monday, June 2nd at 10 AM PT; new hardware likely | 9to5Mac (May 21st)
The previous rumor for Retina MBA said "late 2014", and Intel's chips have been confirmed delayed, so I don't think it's the most likely. Which leaves Apple TVs, iWatches and Mac mini. Apple doesn't care about mac minis enough to announce it at wwdc and any new Apple TV would be around the same time as a new iOS release imo. So iWatches (unveiled at WWDC and released in the Fall)?
And seriously, the Apple TV needs that Kinect-esque gesture/voice control stuff soon. I'm ready to get rid of my remote.