MPAA Rejects Eva Green Poster for 'Sin City: A Dame to Kill For'

Status
Not open for further replies.

159.gif
 

Malreyn

Member
Even if they rejected this poster, im convinced the internet will just circulate this article with said banned poster, and draw EVERYONE's attention....

Its a Win/Win for everyone!
 

double jump

you haven't lived until a random little kid ask you "how do you make love".
ugh... is this the same women that ruined 300 2 ?
mpaa made the right choice.
 

Borgnine

MBA in pussy licensing and rights management
rejected "for nudity - curve of under breast and dark nipple/areola circle visible through sheer gown,"

I mean just this description right here is enough to fap to.
 

Zoe

Member
Violence, dismemberment and gore? Advertise the hell out of it.

Tits? Crisis.

America, fuck yeah.

For video advertising, sure, but you never see comparable violence in posters that would hang in a lobby for everyone to see.
 

riotous

Banned
That's dame I can achieve an erection for.

And I enjoy sharing that news with you all.

And I hope you enjoy having it shared.
 

JoeMartin

Member
For video advertising, sure, but you never see comparable violence in posters that would hang in a lobby for everyone to see.

Not even scraping at horror/gore genre posters, there is just as much suggestive violence in posters for pretty much anything.

My problem is that violence is some sort of socially acceptable norm where anything remotely sexual is instantly a moral evil from which we must protect our children.
 
Putting on my conspiracy theory hat here..

I'm pretty sure they made the poster specifically to get rejected by the MPAA, so they could full court press it (like they are now) with TOO HOT FOR HOLLYWOOD etc etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom