Skiptastic
Member
That poster certainly got a Rise out of my Empire, if you know what I mean...
she's not bad, she's just drawn that way
dat jpeg compression tho
dat jpeg compression tho
I see nothing wrong here.
Probably be seen by more people than it would be had it been allowed due to the press coverage.I can understand after seeing it but that's practically a work of art. It needs to be seen!
Is it because you can see her right nipple?
ugh... is this the same women that ruined 300 2 ?
mpaa made the right choice.
I am way into several scenes from The Dreamers.Look up The Dreamers.
You're welcome.
rejected "for nudity - curve of under breast and dark nipple/areola circle visible through sheer gown,"
ugh... is this the same women that ruined 300 2 ?
mpaa made the right choice.
Violence, dismemberment and gore? Advertise the fuck out of it.
Tits? Crisis.
America, fuck yeah.
I mean just this description right here is enough to fap to.
she's not bad, she's just drawn that way
Must not post gif. I understood that reference.
Also, oh my...
real life is clearly offensive.
Violence, dismemberment and gore? Advertise the hell out of it.
Tits? Crisis.
America, fuck yeah.
A little too risque for the mass audiences. I see no issue with not allowing it.
For video advertising, sure, but you never see comparable violence in posters that would hang in a lobby for everyone to see.
I'm pretty sure you mean "saved 300 2".