Shamrock7r
Member
No character can replace Ness for me, but I cannot wait to get good with Pac-Man. Definitely going to make him my secondary.
I played the demo at Best Buy, and I'm disappointed in no traditional blue Mario from past games. I really hope this bubblegum / Wario blue colour didn't replace it.![]()
I never knew people hated brawl until like recently.
I thought it was amazing and had a great time playing it (even SSE in which me and a friend beat in 2 days of awesome).
So personally, I don't care about half the "issues" lol. I really want more character impressions dammit.
Does everything need to be positive in this thread? I wasn't aware negative opinions were banned in Smash 4
On a competitive level, I prefer it to melee. It just plays to my sensibilities more. I can understand some of the negativity for some of it's features though, although I think the hate is overblown by the very nitpicky, whiny tourney community.
Wrong. I hated it and have never competed in Smash.Brawl wasn't an awful game if you listen to anyone not in the competitive scene.
Each fighter possesses four special attacks; standard special, side special, up special, and down special. Each of these can be customized, however, so there are three variations for each direction. This means there are two classifications for special attacks: basic and custom.
However, Mii Fighters and Palutena don't have spin-off variations, but rather completely unique types of attacks.
Has anyone mentioned this on the website yet?
What's the deal with that?
She has a lot of attacksHas anyone mentioned this on the website yet?
What's the deal with that?
Has anyone mentioned this on the website yet?
What's the deal with that?
There are a lot of people who need to remember that the competitive community is like, a tiny percentage of the people who play Smash Brothers. I think a lot more people prefer Brawl to Melee even because it's the newest one and that's totally fine. I personally am not a fan of Melee and I love Brawl.
Has anyone mentioned this on the website yet?
What's the deal with that?
Nitpicky and whiny is the keyword. there are already Melee diehards that are complaining about Smash4 and refusing to buy it. Even wanting to petition Sakurai to essentially make it a Melee 2.0. I am in the camp to let Sakurai make the game he wants to make. We have Melee, We have Brawl, I like both for their own reasons. And I will like Smash4 for it's own reasons and I won't have an aneurysm over it.
Has anyone mentioned this on the website yet?
What's the deal with that?
There's a decent article on a certain nintendo enthusiast (literally) site that comes from a competitive player about what he thinks of the game (I would post the link but it's a banned site apparently...)
Says some interesting good things about the game.
I was with him until he said that the Grand Finals going to time is a problem with the game and not the player.
Aware of it, thanks, but just because the comp. community is smaller does not mean you should actively gut options out of the game. Simple movement options related to only physics and frame data -- both of which have zero impact on casual players.
Some of you guys are really coming off as elitist and it's kinda annoying. Smash is supposed to appeal to everyone and everyone includes competitive players.
vgbootcamp got permission to stream the Smash-Fest at their Best Buy: http://www.twitch.tv/vgbootcamp
Lol the cam is far away though.![]()
Wasn't it 4 stocks for the grand finals? If so, I think that was just a problem with the setup. The pace looks closer to Brawl than Melee when it pertains to how long a character lives. They should have used the Brawl 3 stock setup.
I was with him until he said that the Grand Finals going to time is a problem with the game and not the player.
But people are saying that this and that are removed or changed when there is likely more than they don't know about that's been added. It's not like someone got Melee and within a few hours was "yeah cool we can wavedash".
I just don't think many of the analyses are fair without having played the game for a while and really researched it. Impressions are fine but some people are taking them as gospel
The fact that Zero's campy, spammy tactics were so effective was the game's fault, though. He was just making use of the most viable tactics he could find and playing to win, boring as it was to watch.
Alright, I checked my prediction roster thread. How many people predicted those characters to be in Smash 4.
Palutena - 66.39%
Pac-Man - 57.15%
Mii - 20.17%
Dammit, I forget to put Pac Man on my list and he was one of my most wanted character. I didn't put Villager and Mii because Sakurai wrote them off right after Brawl.![]()
Read smashboards and some of the subreddit
An incredibly loud part of the community is ridiculously toxic. I can't even believe some of the crap I've read. There are people acting like Sakurai doesn't know shit about the game
Feel like his comment to the guy who asked to help balance the game yesterday is appropriate.
"Have you ever made a game"
Honestly some of the most retarded crap I've read on the internet.
There are ways of expressing complaints about the game and it feels as though this portion of the smash community doesn't know shit about how to do so
vgbootcamp got permission to stream the Smash-Fest at their Best Buy: http://www.twitch.tv/vgbootcamp
Lol the cam is far away though.![]()
Read smashboards and some of the subreddit
An incredibly loud part of the community is ridiculously toxic. I can't even believe some of the crap I've read. There are people acting like Sakurai doesn't know shit about the game
Feel like his comment to the guy who asked to help balance the game yesterday is appropriate.
"Have you ever made a game"
Honestly some of the most retarded crap I've read on the internet.
There are ways of expressing complaints about the game and it feels as though this portion of the smash community doesn't know shit about how to do so
Aware of it, thanks, but just because the comp. community is smaller does not mean you should actively gut options out of the game. Simple movement options related to only physics and frame data -- both of which have zero impact on casual players.
Some of you guys are really coming off as elitist and it's kinda annoying. Smash is supposed to appeal to everyone and everyone includes competitive players.
It's just they are concerned and worried, dude. They love the series as much as you or anyone else does because they've invested THOUSANDS of hours, maybe even millions, playing whatever one they focus in (whether it's 64, Melee, Brawl, or PM). And now they feel is their chance to get their voices heard to make some *small* changes that have zero impact on your or anyone else's enjoyment.
The scene doesn't want a repeat of what happened with Brawl. I wish you could understand it. People *do* want to have a new Smash game they can play alongside Melee and that's why sooooo many people are being vitriolic to giving valid criticism to overreacting etc etc.
The hate might be the loudest part but you have to look past that hate and realize there are VALID complaints being made and leveled at the game that *can* be fixed and aren't just things people are making judgments about prematurely. Tons of landing lag on aerials is simply not something you can say is fine. That is a valid complaint.
Wrong. I hated it and have never competed in Smash.
aMSa said:1:02: -A Kirby that copies Link's ability can use an aerial neutral B [arrow] and cancel lag upon landing.
It is funny to hear the whining. All I really want from Smash 4 is make steady online, add new characters, take out tripping, and have a variety fof modes. So far they are delivering...