I really don't like interracial anal scenes in porn. It always looks like shes taking a shit and sucking it back up her butt.

I was not expecting this.
I really don't like interracial anal scenes in porn. It always looks like shes taking a shit and sucking it back up her butt.
If only there were people who regularly had anal sex with little to no repercussions. We could use them as a case study instead of just leaving it up entirely to speculation.
I highly doubt something larger than a finger on occasion will cause long term permanent damage.
Opinions can be wrong. You seem to be of the opinion it would be physically harmful. I don't see evidence for that.
If it can be right or wrong, then it isn't an opinion.
Tell that to people who resort to the "just my opinion" defense when making a factual claim.
Why do you care if some people aren't interested in butt play?
...You and a few others are taking those posts far too seriously.
I don't care if people aren't keen on it, but the "ew poop" excuse is too absurd to not compare to what they seem to think is the cleanest bodily part. You can't make such a blanket statement about anuses and then carry on with your nasty self inside the world's weirdest plumbing job as if it's so much more sanitary.
I read that this makes you ineligible to become a blood and organ donor. I specifically remember a questionnaire during a blood donation asking me If I had man on man anal sex in the last few years.
EWWw PooP. There. It is nasty. it is fucking poop hole.It is not going to change any time soon. people like all kind of crazy things. Go to the rosebud thread. anal to the max. The truth remains it is poop hole. Eww poop.
I tried but he wont make eye contact with mesome of yall need to see jesus
because it's a pain in the ass
I really don't like interracial anal scenes in porn. It always looks like shes taking a shit and sucking it back up her butt.
I really don't like interracial anal scenes in porn. It always looks like shes taking a shit and sucking it back up her butt.
...You and a few others are taking those posts far too seriously.
I don't care if people aren't keen on it, but the "ew poop" excuse is too absurd to not compare to what they seem to think is the cleanest bodily part. You can't make such a blanket statement about anuses and then carry on with your nasty self inside the world's weirdest plumbing job as if it's so much more sanitary.
But by itself, "ew poop" is an absolutely fantastic reason to avoid anuses when possible.
I wouldn't necessarily call "writing-off" things for the reasons you mentioned above necessarily short-sighted. There are after all some people that find all of that unpleasant, and really don't like things of a sexual nature at all. Some people simply aren't into any of those things, while others are just put off by them once they start thinking about it. Doesn't necessarily mean you're short-sighted, right?...And a completely short-sighted one. Point being that one can easily write off vaginas with the same line of reasoning, but one shouldn't do as such. A woman could follow the same reasoning with penises; why would she want something that pees all of the time inside her? Acting disgusted with parts of others' and your own body is a lot more unnatural than trying a route other than the old reliable vagina every night.
I mean, what about mouths? Going to swear off kissing and oral because she threw up somewhat recently? Those mouths go through a lot and have a lot of bacteria present.
This dude must of been going to the gym, to be so sweaty.
...And a completely short-sighted one. Point being that one can easily write off vaginas with the same line of reasoning, but one shouldn't do as such. A woman could follow the same reasoning with penises; why would she want something that pees all of the time inside her? Acting disgusted with parts of others' and your own body is a lot more unnatural than trying a route other than the old reliable vagina every night.
I mean, what about mouths? Going to swear off kissing and oral because she threw up somewhat recently? Those mouths go through a lot and have a lot of bacteria present.
I wouldn't necessarily call "writing-off" things for the reasons you mentioned above necessarily short-sighted. There are after all some people that find all of that unpleasant, and really don't like things of a sexual nature at all. Some people simply aren't into any of those things, while others are just put off by them once they start thinking about it. Doesn't necessarily mean you're short-sighted, right?
You're trying to paint everything as black and white, when it's not. This "either swear off all stuff that could be gross or you can't swear off anything due to grossness" line isn't tenable. Mouths are gross; most think kissing is worth it. Vaginas are more gross; most think sex is worth it. Anuses are the grossest orifice; many think it's so gross it's not worth playing with. It's a perfectly reasonable opinion to be so grossed out by poop that you don't want anything to do with anuses. The body is not a binary gross-or-not-gross. It's a spectrum, and at the far end of gross is the anus.
Ah that's true I was talkong about anal sex in general. Just reminded me of a story I read about today.That doesn't cover pegging I don't think.
woman on man anal sex brah.
...And a completely short-sighted one. Point being that one can easily write off vaginas with the same line of reasoning, but one shouldn't do as such. A woman could follow the same reasoning with penises; why would she want something that pees all of the time inside her? Acting disgusted with parts of others' and your own body is a lot more unnatural than trying a route other than the old reliable vagina every night.
I mean, what about mouths? Going to swear off kissing and oral because she threw up somewhat recently? Those mouths go through a lot and have a lot of bacteria present.
If poop really, really grosses someone out, but vaginal fluids don't, why is "poop" a 'wrong' reason?"Poop" is not a right reason.
Why? The anus is different than everything else you listed: Poop comes out of it daily. Why is it silly for a unique property of the anus to cause someone to evaluate it differently than other things?Where did I say that it's all-or-nothing? Let me repeat myself: you can use the same line of reasoning to varying success for a lot of bodily parts, but most don't. The anus being an exception is ultimately silly.
Yes, and as I've said before, there's a difference between not being into it and just dismissing the notion with an immature "poop!" or "that's gay stuff". Your sexual interests are your own, but you should always see whether or not you're refusing to try something for the right reasons. "Poop" is not a right reason.
So we're now moving it to where it depends on how frequently these orifices produce nasty things? Okay, then the penis wins for producing urine multiple times a day. Now penises are nastier than anuses. Or maybe a mouth that's been eating too much Thai food. Or even a vagina with overactive vaginal discharges. Or literally anything compared to a person who has terribly irregular bowel movements.Why? The anus is different than everything else you listed: Poop comes out of it daily.
Because production of human waste - on a daily basis or otherwise - is not a unique property of the anus.Why is it silly for a unique property of the anus to cause someone to evaluate it differently than other things?
That's a bit of a blanket statement, no? In that case, period blood can have the same effect on people. Neither of those things have to be present during intercourse unless you're just kinky like that.Says who? The smell of poop, the sight of poop, the thought of poop, etc. is enough to make people vomit.
So we're now moving it to where it depends on how frequently these orifices produce nasty things? Okay, then the penis wins for producing urine multiple times a day. Now penises are nastier than anuses. Or maybe a mouth that's been eating too much Thai food. Or even a vagina with overactive vaginal discharges. Or literally anything compared to a person who has terribly irregular bowel movements.
You see why that doesn't work?
Because production of human waste - on a daily basis or otherwise - is not a unique property of the anus.
...You brought up "daily", you do realize? I pointed that out because you moved it to the area of "frequency". Are you trying to troll me? Is this strawmanception?Strawman. Poop is the primary factor. Remove "daily" and the argument stands, the question remains.
My question is what makes them all so different to the point that one would be perfectly accepting of one and not the other. Our bodies are pretty nasty, on the whole. And again, there is no poop present during anal sex, so it's a question of why x orifice is so unacceptable because it produces y instead of z.Poop is different than pee, it's different than vaginal fluids, it's different than saliva. Your attempt to pretend they're all the same or should all be treated the same is folly.
If poop really, really grosses someone out, but vaginal fluids don't, why is "poop" a 'wrong' reason?
Why? The anus is different than everything else you listed: Poop comes out of it daily. Why is it silly for a unique property of the anus to cause someone to evaluate it differently than other things?
So we're now moving it to where it depends on how frequently these orifices produce nasty things? Okay, then the penis wins for producing urine multiple times a day. Now penises are nastier than anuses. Or maybe a mouth that's been eating too much Thai food. Or even a vagina with overactive vaginal discharges. Or literally anything compared to a person who has terribly irregular bowel movements.
You see why that doesn't work?
Because production of human waste - on a daily basis or otherwise - is not a unique property of the anus.
He brought up the arbitrary factor of frequency. I was pointing out how it's a silly one.You just done the same thing again: equating two clearly different things by some arbitrary factor.
The people complaining about poop are obviously not doing it much. it's kind of the thing you whine about when you're just talking out of your ass.
He brought up the arbitrary factor of frequency. I was pointing out how it's a silly one.
Obviously. But my question has remained why that makes the front porch sanitary and the back door nasty.
Obviously they're not doing it much when the argument given is "I'm not interested because..."