• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Luis Suarez the football vampire has bitten another player [Update: BANNED]

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's you projecting. You're not stupid. You know it's about your media and everyone involved in your team.

im still talking about media man, people on TV are having different, condemning opinions, local players, figures..

I just think "URUGUAY IS BACKING HIM UP!" as a statement and even a paper headline is just embarrasing and telling
 
im still talking about media man, people on TV are having different, condemning opinions, local players, figures..

I just think "URUGUAY IS BACKING HIM UP!" as a statement and even a paper headline is embarrasing
Could please link to one Uruguayan news outlet which condemns his actions? Would lower the pressure.
 
Could please link to one Uruguayan news outlet which condemns his actions? Would lower the pressure.

the one comment that got picked up by the same media that are reporting everything else is in this page of the thread

edit: well last if your're 50ppp

also, quoting pedro:

C'mon, I mean is if the nation of Uruguay are a singular entity acting in unison, defending the guy. Of course, at the same time, they're more inclined to defend him, as perhaps any of us would if it was one of our own countrymen. That inherent bias would apply to any nation. But there are going to be many, many Uruguayans who don't condone his actions. You don't really need proof for that.
 
Shocking, local pundits in a very small country with few people of international note are defending him. Of course they're going to circle the wagons around their superstar. Is it really surprising or unexpected for anyone?
 
Fuck it, this thread is now about the victimization of Uruguay. Mission accomplished, no one will talk about Suarez anymore.
 
Fuck it, this thread is now about the victimization of Uruguay. Mission accomplished, no one will talk about Suarez anymore.

victimization?

more about the argument of Uruguay in general for some dumbfounded reason. vast majority in this thread shifted this towards the entire country and everyone's opinion on the matter

I say something as obvious as "not everyone has the same opinion" and people ask me for proof or whatever fuck else has nothing to do with Suarez. Either you guys hate me or really wanna justify some sudden hate for my country.

Im sorry not all of the 3 million people here are defending someone biting another player in a sport that's a national treasure, that'd probably make things easier to keep shouting and pointing fingers
 
I just got back from a trip to Uruguay. I can confirm that there are literally only three people living there and they all defend Suarez.

Salsa doesn't count because he's a mole-thing.
 
victimization?

more about the argument of Uruguay in general for some dumbfounded reason. vast majority in this thread shifted this towards the entire country and everyone's opinion on the matter

I say something something as obvious as "not everyone has the same opinion" and people ask me for proof or whatever fuck else has nothing to do with Suarez. Either you guys hate me or really wanna justify some sudden hate for my country

Don't you see a problem with the president of your country defending him.

Can't speak for all the country but the impression an outsider gets is that there is a lot of support of him in Uruguay with codemnation being less prevalent.
 
victimization?

more about the argument of Uruguay in general for some dumbfounded reason. vast majority in this thread shifted this towards the entire country and everyone's opinion on the matter
You're the man culprit in shifting it. It was never about the country, it was about Suarez. Talking about context. And I'm fucking stupid cunt for explaining it again. I will try to bite my fingers off so I wont post in this thread anymore.
 
So, here's something that springs to mind: What was the commentary like internationally for the incident? I mean, it's something that is being reported on live by a large number of people. I'm curious what the instant reaction to it was, particularly from the Italian and Uruguaian quarters but also from the (approximately) 'impartial observer' standpoint.
 
Don't you see a problem with the president of your country defending him.

Can't speak for all the country but the impression an outsider gets is that there is a lot of support of him in Uruguay.

of course there's a lot of support, there also isnt

Mujica has a blabber mouth and has become some sort of weed-meme worldwide for his low-profile and speaking his mind, but do you really expect the president of a country to go out there and say something that would divide people on his opinions that bad?

his statement is super vague, as should be. "I didnt see it"

I dont love the "statement" (as informal as it is), I don't love Mujica talking in general, but I get it

this, also, still applies:

Of course, at the same time, they're more inclined to defend him, as perhaps any of us would if it was one of our own countrymen. That inherent bias would apply to any nation. But there are going to be many, many Uruguayans who don't condone his actions. You don't really need proof for that.




You're the man culprit in shifting it. It was never about the country, it was about Suarez. Talking about context. And I'm fucking stupid cunt for explaining it again. I will try to bite my fingers off so I wont post in this thread anymore.

nah, read the thread. the "apparently the entire country is defending him" and subsequent "oh wow no shame what scum" comments and links to articles didn't come from me man, I just saw it and decided to intervene before it became some sort of uruguay hatred circlejerk. I live here, after all
 
So, here's something that springs to mind: What was the commentary like internationally for the incident? I mean, it's something that is being reported on live by a large number of people. I'm curious what the instant reaction to it was, particularly from the Italian and Uruguaian quarters but also from the (approximately) 'impartial observer' standpoint.

'What's happened here, Chiellini seems to be suggesting that he's been bitten.From this angle it looks like Suarez has leant his head in...oh, I cannot believe that, Luis Suarez appears to have bitten Georgio Chiellini, and he's lucky to still be on the pitch. I'm sure FIFA will be taking a good long look at that after the game'


In England, essentially. Our media is well-versed in reacting to this though.
 
You're the man culprit in shifting it. It was never about the country, it was about Suarez. Talking about context. And I'm fucking stupid cunt for explaining it again. I will try to bite my fingers off so I wont post in this thread anymore.

And, you know what, the conversation will shift back to Suarez once FIFA issue their punishment. There's only so many ways you can condemn or condone somebody before the conversation turns to something else. In this case, it's the nature of how the English speaking media has reported the Uruguayan reaction to the bite.

The Italians are mostly frustrated from blowing the group stage from such a good start. Suarez and Uruguay are easy targets from their perspective, just like how Ronaldo and Portugal were easy targets when Rooney got sent off in 2006.
 
Aye

Best sport too, though.


Shame this time he's soured what has been a fantastic World Cup. At least in 2010 he gave us something to talk about when there was fuck all else happening :P

Soured the whole world cup? It was the only exciting thing to happen for the entire damned match lol.

I think his antics against Ghana were far worse. He almost single handedly (scuse pun) knocked them out of the World Cup with one of the most dick moves possible, now that is something Ghana will never forgive him for. Italy lost on their own merits and Chiellini will continue playing with no long term or even short term injury, he didnt even need treatment.

This is more like a circus stunt by comparison. Its more the shock and disbelief of what he did because its nearly unheard of....for anyone else anyway. There have been far worse attempts on a player and their career. This is more lunacy and awe than anything else.

Saying the entire Uruguay team should be reprimanded or expelled from the tournament is ridiculous, it was the act of a single player and an action that didnt effect the outcome of the game. Uruguays only natural position is to defend their player who has the best chance to keep them moving forward in the cup and thats what they are doing, any other team in the world would be doing exactly the same thing, this isnt a uniquely Uruguayan position, taking it out on the team wont right anything.
 
WC is good and im excited to continue watching



also: you know, about the actual topic: we'll probably find out the ruling in a bit
 
of course there's a lot of support, there also isnt

Mujica has a blabber mouth and has become some sort of weed-meme worldwide for his low-profile and speaking his mind, but do you really expect the president of a country to go out there and say something that would divide people on his opinions that bad?

his statement is super vague, as should be. "I didnt see it"

Well I have seen the support but saw a lot less of the lack of it. The people with influence and positions seem to support Suarez. But my standards of what support and apologism might are different than yours, for example I think you support him or at least did support him and are all over the place.

His statement is embarassing nonsense and I don't see how it wouldn't be divisive towards those who don't like Suarez or think "don't see it, this shit happen, it is just football, slippery slope" is embarassing arguements. Surely there are less divisive statements to make about this. Like praise the rest of the players, say how the success is not overshadowed by the actions of one person.

Either way there are a lot worse sins than supporting Suarez as big of a cunt as he is, so no big deal but it is a losing battle.

At such Uruguay is cool, but it still kind of sucks that there is so much support of him. But I agree with you that the country shouldn't be hated, people get too far in doing that sometimes.
 
It depends on your perspective on the actual act itself. I don't find the act monstrous, I find it stupid and juvenile. I don't think it's worthy, despite him doing it for the third time in his career, of an all encompassing ban. I think missing out on the rest of the World Cup and, perhaps, an extended international ban to be sufficient punishment. Oh yes, and ensure he wears a gum shield at all times during matches from now on.

I found his racist abuse of Evra more destructive, disgusting and monstrous than what he did during the Italy game. Repeat behaviour of that would be worthy of an all encompassing ban.

I know this was posted a few hours ago but I feel the need to reply. I was bitten by a shoplifter a while who whilst working retail and I'd rather have been punched, there's something horribly intimate about wanting to physically hurt someone that way and at the time it really shocked me. Although kids bite there's nothing juvenile about a grown man biting someone, and I don't think it should be trivialised like that, my automatic reaction was to backhand my biter and I'm impressed Chiellini kept his cool. You expect an element of physicality in today's game but nothing on that level.

Edit

Also, I understand the national defence for Suarez, no one's going to outright condemn what he did and I would expect the same if an England player did something similar ( although our press would go to town, they love shit like that). I doubt he'll get any sort of ban, I think he may lose a sponsorship deal though.
 
Soured the whole world cup? It was the only exciting thing to happen for the entire damned match lol.

I think his antics against Ghana were far worse. He almost single handedly (scuse pun) knocked them out of the World Cup with one of the most dick moves possible, now that is something Ghana will never forgive him for. Italy lost on their own merits and Chiellini will continue playing with no long term or even short term injury, he didnt even need treatment.

This is more like a circus stunt by comparison. Its more the shock and disbelief of what he did because its nearly unheard of....for anyone else anyway. There have been far worse attempts on a player and their career. This is more lunacy and awe than anything else.

Saying the entire Uruguay team should be reprimanded or expelled from the tournament is ridiculous, it was the act of a single player and an action that didnt effect the outcome of the game. Uruguays only natural position is to defend their player who has the best chance to keep them moving forward in the cup and thats what they are doing, any other team in the world would be doing exactly the same thing, this isnt a uniquely Uruguayan position, taking it out on the team wont right anything.

Maybe soured was the wrong word, but it's distracted from what has been a great tournament. The media aren't talking about the brilliant matches and goals, or even going through the normal England-exit inquest. It's all about the bite.
 
Soured the whole world cup? It was the only exciting thing to happen for the entire damned match lol.

So? Another country got robbed from advancing just like 4 years ago. Suarez and the Uruagayan team is a farce and a joke to the sport of soccer. Screw them, they deserve a ban from the WC imo.
 
I know this was posted a few hours ago but I feel the need to reply. I was bitten by a shoplifter a while who whilst working retail and I'd rather have been punched, there's something horribly intimate about wanting to physically hurt someone that way and at the time it really shocked me. Although kids bite there's nothing juvenile about a grown man biting someone, and I don't think it should be trivialised like that, my automatic reaction was to backhand my biter and I'm impressed Chiellini kept his cool. You expect an element of physicality in today's game but nothing on that level.

I feel I should further qualify my remark in that a bite in the context of a football match is stupid and juvenile. Outside of that, particular to your situation, that's a perfectly valid response and I would be similarly disgusted too. On a football pitch, I've been elbowed in the side, in the chin and had someone back into me and stamp on my foot (which put me out for a few weeks) and I'd much rather be bitten, because, in the context of a football match, it's something I can shrug off and continue on regardless.
 
So, here's something that springs to mind: What was the commentary like internationally for the incident? I mean, it's something that is being reported on live by a large number of people. I'm curious what the instant reaction to it was, particularly from the Italian and Uruguaian quarters but also from the (approximately) 'impartial observer' standpoint.

Dutch.

"... Chiellini. How often has he gone to the ground? And Suarez checking out his teeth. *shift in camera* Here... That isn't? Not again right? It wouldn't again be a biting attempt right? *shift in camera* Well! He did! He did it again! It looks suspiciously like it. Get all the cameras. We need to see this duel again. You wouldn't believe he did this for the third time in his career."
 
So? Another country got robbed from advancing just like 4 years ago. Suarez and the Uruagayan team is a farce and a joke to the sport of soccer. Screw them, they deserve a ban from the WC imo.

Not really. Ghana were tangibly robbed of progression by Suarez cheating. Italy, not so much.
 
I feel I should further qualify my remark in that a bite in the context of a football match is stupid and juvenile. Outside of that, particular to your situation, that's a perfectly valid response and I would be similarly disgusted too. On a football pitch, I've been elbowed in the side, in the chin and had someone back into me and stamp on my foot (which put me out for a few weeks) and I'd much rather be bitten, because, in the context of a football match, it's something I can shrug off and continue on regardless.
I suppose when you compare the physical damage done to yourself you're correct, however I think it's the intent that separates the acts here. I think you need to be a nasty piece of work to intentionally bite someone.
 
xpumhq.gif


FIFA needs to change the rules on this. They are merely encouraging players to break the rules by not awarding a goal for such behavior.

Now they've *got* goal-line technology, it crosses my mind that in logistic terms, this is fundamentally the same principle as leg-before-wicket, and could trivially be handled and adjudicated in exactly the same way.
 
Now they've *got* goal-line technology, it crosses my mind that in logistic terms, this is fundamentally the same principle as leg-before-wicket, and could trivially be handled and adjudicated in exactly the same way.

If I was a ref I'd be tempted to just pretend that I thought it crossed the line. FIFA wouldn't stand for that though, it'd be the end of your refereeing career
 
In the case of the Suarez handball, I think the rule should be thus:

A: If the ball may have entered the net, penalty and a red card
B: If the ball would have entered the net, goal awarded and red card

That ball absolutely 100% was crossing the line so the goal should have stood.
 
So? Another country got robbed from advancing just like 4 years ago. Suarez and the Uruagayan team is a farce and a joke to the sport of soccer. Screw them, they deserve a ban from the WC imo.

Oh they did? Your saying suarez biting Chiellini is what caused Italy to lose 1-0? Not the 80minutes of trying to do nothing but defend and look mediocre all over the park?

Want to talk about acts causing teams to be robbed? I remember a team going out of a World Cup in 2006 when an Italian player dived in a penalty box. Pretty sure though he got lauded as a hero by Italy and the press.....
 
Well didn't the goal come right after the bite? I'm sure Italy was like wtf just happened.

It's a massive stretch, though. I remember feeling indignant outrage at the whole Ghana thing; the sheer lack of sportsmanship and zero justice for the handball was palpable. I suppose you could argue that Suarez being sent off would have changed the match, but even if the goal came straight after, there's no tangible through line. The Italian player wasn't injured in a footballing sense, so I don't see the two events as being similar. Italy robbed themselves by not playing nearly as well after beating England.

What amazes me is what fellow professionals will do to each other to win a game. I still feel for that French player (Blanc was it?) who missed the final (the pinnacle of the game) because a Croatian player simulated injury. It's depressing what some players will do.
 
In the case of the Suarez handball, I think the rule should be thus:

A: If the ball may have entered the net, penalty and a red card
B: If the ball would have entered the net, goal awarded and red card

That ball absolutely 100% was crossing the line so the goal should have stood.

Yup... Ghana was robbed and I hate Suarez for it. Just think if it was your country he robbed of advancing with such a cunt action.
 
In the case of the Suarez handball, I think the rule should be thus:

A: If the ball may have entered the net, penalty and a red card
B: If the ball would have entered the net, goal awarded and red card

That ball absolutely 100% was crossing the line so the goal should have stood.

Funny thing is, I'm sure Suarez could have headed that ball if he'd tried :D
 
Yup... Ghana was robbed and I hate Suarez for it. Just think if it was your country he robbed of advancing with such a cunt action.

Imagine the outcry and change of opinion if Suarez had done the exact same thing during the England match. The media would have utterly destroyed him (even more than they are doing now).
 
Maybe soured was the wrong word, but it's distracted from what has been a great tournament. The media aren't talking about the brilliant matches and goals, or even going through the normal England-exit inquest. It's all about the bite.

The England team must be delighted that something's come along to take the heat off them.
 
Imagine if he'd bitten Gerrard and handballed a last minute winner off the line

and got Rooney sent off for faking an elbow to the face injury. The country would just explode and launch itself into the sun with furious indignation. It would be a thing of curious, destructive beauty to watch the media at work with all that in play.

Instead, we have to contend with an anemic exit at the group stage. WHERE IS OUR SCAPEGOAT THIS TIME AROUND? Our Beckham circa 98, or Ronaldo circa 2006.
 
and got Rooney sent off for faking an elbow to the face injury. The country would just explode and launch itself into the sun with furious indignation. It would be a thing of curious, destructive beauty to watch the media at work with all that in play.

Instead, we have to contend with an anemic exit at the group stage. WHERE IS OUR SCAPEGOAT THIS TIME AROUND? Our Beckham circa 98, or Ronaldo circa 2006.

Normally it would be Godin for not being sent off, but as with the linesman in 2010, we've finally accepted that we just weren't good enough and didn't deserve to progress

I'm not sure if it's better like this :(
 
Normally it would be Godin for not being sent off, but as with the linesman in 2010, we've finally accepted that we just weren't good enough and didn't deserve to progress

I'm not sure if it's better like this :(

The last time I was truly excited for England was the 2004 Euro's. The beautiful agony of going out heroically seems a long, long time ago. It's been a long time since we've seen that England.
 
The last time I was truly excited for England was the 2004 Euro's. The beautiful agony of going out heroically seems a long, long time ago. It's been a long time since we've seen that England.

2010 and 2012 are the most cowardly displays I've ever seen from us. No interest in attacking, just trying to get a clean sheet and scrap our way through games. At least we tried to score this time, I guess.


Anyway, back to Suarez :P
 
To me that just suggests they can't agree on the period of time for the ban, rather than if there will be one or not.

Yeah, there is no good news for Suarez. He won't kick another ball (or bite another player) in anger during this World Cup. It's not a case of if, but how long should he be banned for. For all the criticism the Uruguayan team have had, all they're doing is not giving FIFA any more rope from which to hang Suarez. Most teams do the same with any controversial incident involving a teammate. Play dumb and let events take their course. Liverpool and Dalglish rather idiotically did the same during the whole Evra debacle.
 
Yeah, there is no good news for Suarez. He won't kick another ball (or bite another player) in anger during this World Cup. It's not a case of if, but how long should he be banned for.

And whether the ban covers club football as well


I'm on tenterhooks personally, the punishment will have a huge impact on his Liverpool career, or the transfer fee we get for him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom