Iran's Photoshoppery Skills tend to suck.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xabora

Junior Member
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/30597_Irans_Photoshopped_Missile_Launch/
20080709IranMissilePhotoshop4.jpg


:lol
 
Solaros said:
I'm not too good at this game.

Can someone tell me what is wrong with the picture?

they copied and pasted parts of the image to make it look like that last missile went off.

It really doesn't matter because Iran's missile systems suck ass

They'd be lucky to hit Tehran

black_13 said:
Just proves the amount of budget they have for their military. Why is Iran a threat again?

cuz if we take over Iran we can combine all three countries to make USAistan
 
Forsete said:
Original image

iranmissil448.jpg

I see its cropped now, anyway they shot 3, maybe they forgot to trigger the 4th? :lol
Reports that came out said the 4th failed to launch due to problems or something.
Damn PS2s.
 
Xabora said:
Reports that came out said the 4th failed to launch due to problems or something.
Damn PS2s.

"Damn poorly made American missiles, how are we meant to kill you dead when your crap doesnt work!"

Yeah i know they arent American.
 
Phoenix said:

I saw them talking about this on CNN about an hour ago. The guy delivering the information then photoshopped the original to look almost exactly like Iran's fake in about 10 seconds, using only the clone stamp :lol
 
What's funny is the New York Times Blog refused to credit LGF for breaking the story, and other outlets in the mainstream media are now crediting the New York Times Blog for it.

Classic.

You'd figure after they broke the whole Dan Rather thing, the mainstream media would give the alt blogs like LGF at least a tiny bit of respect. Obviously though, the only bloggers they respect now are the ones run by their buddies and cronies in old, established, mainstream media.

The mainstream media is such a bunch of retards. They are so interested in protecting their little circle of cronies, they'll even damage their own credibility to do so.
 
Pristine_Condition said:
What's funny is the New York Times Blog refused to credit LGF for breaking the story, and other outlets in the mainstream media are now crediting the New York Times Blog for it.

Classic.

You'd figure after they broke the whole Dan Rather thing, the mainstream media would give the alt blogs like LGF at least a tiny bit of respect. Obviously though, the only bloggers they respect now are the ones run by their buddies and cronies in old, established, mainstream media.

The mainstream media is such a bunch of retards. They are so interested in protecting their little circle of cronies, they'll even damage their own credibility to do so.

Or maybe they don't want to link people to hate sites? I think it was the responsible thing to do.
 
Linking to LGF should be treated like bringing up Hitler in a discussion, and the linker should lose the debate.

Uh-oh...
 
black_13 said:
Just proves the amount of budget they have for their military. Why is Iran a threat again?
Because terrorism is cheap and because of nuclear weapons? Actually, if those weren't short range missiles 3 out 4 launches isn't bad, it's embarrassing but about what is to be expected for non-Western missiles. Even then, I could be mistaken, but as I recall multiple tests of America's missile defense system had to be aborted since one missile or the other didn't launch (not to mention I just watched a show about the recent sinking of a Canadian warship as a target ship, the Canadian ship doing the sinking couldn't get 1 of her 4 missiles to fire).

As for the photoshop, didn't they have pics of other missile launches they could have used to photoshop? I know the lighting might have been somewhat different but can't that be fixed (I've never used photoshop so I'm not aware of its capabilities). Oh well, the worthless Western media embarrassed itself again, so at least that was worth it.
 
For anyone who is interested, I saw this in yesterday's paper (USA today) already. It's so pathetic it was barely covered
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom