• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

2014 Israel-Gaza Conflict [UN: 1,525+ Palestinian dead, mostly civilian; 66 Israeli]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hamas can't do anything to protect its own people. What they're doing now, awful though it may be, is all they can do. It's either this, or do nothing.
Hamas is over exaggerated by Israel, there fire power is like fireworks in comparison with Israel capabilities. There overkilling in terms in killing civilians while Hamas heads are resting safely in other countries like Qatar and Turkey. My concern are the innocent civilians in Gaza that are being targeted while Hamas can get away with their crap and Israel knowing all this are happily continuing the killing machine.
 
That's a pretty big stretch.

A couple of idiots MK does not represents an entire country / leadership and even so, if those two had their way, Gaza would be a huge hole in the ground by now. We're talking about an army that can level entire cities in seconds.

Hamas doesn't speak or act for 1.8 million people in Gaza. But somehow justifying the deaths of children isn't that big of a stretch?

If the IDF wanted to be considered a legitimate military organization, it would hold it's own soldiers accountable. Right now, they are no better than Hamas.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXRO1YFreNA
This pretty much sums up a lot of what's going on, do not fall for the mainstream corporate owned media. .

"....resources, territory and power..." I agree, 100% with this...for any war.

Everything else, I don't. Truth about war is that there is no truth. Governments will lie, splinter groups will lie, and individuals will make their own narratives (like this video). Hell, I can make a video like this with my own story.
 

I think you may have pasted the wrong article. I was referring to the source of your two quotes. These two:

On the eve of Abu Khudair’s lynching, Member of Knesset (Israel’s parliament) and government faction whip Ayelet Shaked issued a call over Facebook to ethnically cleanse the land, declaring “the entire Palestinian people is the enemy.” She advocated their complete destruction, “including its elderly and its women,” adding that these must be slaughtered, otherwise they might give birth to more “little snakes.”

“After the IDF completes the ‘softening’ of the targets with its firepower, the IDF will conquer the entire Gaza, using all the means necessary to minimize any harm to our soldiers, with no other considerations,” Feiglin writes in one of several calls for outright war crimes.

Following the reconquest, Israel’s army “will thoroughly eliminate all armed enemies from Gaza. The enemy population that is innocent of wrongdoing and separated itself from the armed terrorists will be treated in accordance with international law and will be allowed to leave,” Feiglin writes.

“Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever,” Feiglin concludes. “Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel.”
 
Absolutely horrible. Even worse is people defending the massacre of innocent people.

I'm all for a two state solution but this isn't the way to do it.
 
Rockets aren't paper planes. Rockets kill people. It doesn't matter if Iron Dome shoots down 90% of them, if 1 gets through and kills a civilian it's too many. If the people of Palestine aren't interested in war with Israel then they shouldn't have elected Hamas. It's a recurring problem in the middle east that countries elect radical governments (the brotherhood in Egypt) and then act shocked whenever they're at war being used as human shields (hamas) or their own government begins treating them like subjects in a theocracy (muslim brotherhood).

Hamas' charter explicitly states they seek the destruction of Israel, and they routinely rocket civilian population centers, but I'm supposed to believe Israel is the bad guy here? Anytime civilians die due to the actions of a government, be it theirs or another, it is a tragedy. But Hamas shares equal blame in this, and condemning Israel after attacking Gaza is like condemning a bear that attacks after being poked with a stick for months.

Paramilitary organizations don't work as political blocks. I think one of the best things Israeldid upon its establishment was to formally disband the Jewish paramilitary organizations.
 
Hamas has issued a social-media activist awareness campaign, aimed at guiding pro-Palestinian Twitter and Facebook content.

You can watch the video here: إلى نشطاء الفيسبوك ... انتبهوا وخليكم واعيين !!!

An English translation of the video is available here.

I suppose then, by your logic, anyone who expresses a pro-Pelestinian view/opinion could be associated with Hamas.



I agree. The argument that Hamas "no longer abide by that charter" is misleading and is used to legitimize Hamas.


How is that even comparable to the JIDF and how it operates?

And linking to MEMRI translations? Seriously?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/aug/12/worlddispatch.brianwhitaker
 
Anyone have a link to the Wikileak report mentioned here? And one wonders if Netanyahu or Israel is after peace?...

In a 2007 meeting with Congressman Gary Ackerman, Netanyahu laid out his refusal to divide Jerusalem and return to the 1967 borders—core components of a viable two-state solution. Two WikiLeaks cables from 2009 reveal that once he got in the prime minister’s seat, his vision stayed the same. He told a Congressional delegation that “a Palestinian state must be demilitarized, without control over its air space and electro-magnetic field, and without the power to enter into treaties or control its borders.”

http://mondoweiss.net/2013/06/bradley-manning-israelpalestine.html
 
Both Ayelet Shaked and Feiglin are hardcore, extremist, right-wing psychos and by no mean represents the Israeli government.

I can find countless examples on the Palestinian side that recount the same poison and worse.

Everyone knows those fucking examples, they're brandied day in and day out by Israel and US media to justify this massacre. The fact that you can find them is not an accomplishment. "Hamas wants to wipe out Israel" statement is a core part of Israel's PR machine.

The point is that these quotes by Israel officials are NOT ever given any kind of publicity- you will never, ever hear these quotes repeated on mainstream media, or used as an excuse to kill Israelis. And there's many, many more examples like these that noone seems to care about.

Oh, and Feiglin is part of the Likud party- last I checked, that's the party ruling Israel right now. The point is these people are not expelled from the government because of their openly public genocidal views. Yet Israeli apologizers claim that pretty much all of Gazans are fair game and guilty because of the election of Hamas. And if you actually believe that people like Netanyahou don't have very similar desires, yet are smarter about what they say and how they execute, then you haven't been paying attention.
 
I think you may have pasted the wrong article. I was referring to the source of your two quotes. These two:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/15326#.U8wTJGRdVy8

Op-Ed: My Outline for a Solution in Gaza

Clear and concise, the steps towards achieving quiet in Gaza.
Published: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:01 PM


MK Moshe Feiglin
Moshe Feiglin is head of the Manhigut Yehudit [Jewish Leadership] faction...
► More from this writer

Ultimatum – One warning from the Prime Minister of Israel to the enemy population, in which he announces that Israel is about to attack military targets in their area and urges those who are not involved and do not wish to be harmed to leave immediately. Sinai is not far from Gaza and they can leave. This will be the limit of Israel’s humanitarian efforts. Hamas may unconditionally surrender and prevent the attack.

Attack – Attack the entire ‘target bank’ throughout Gaza with the IDF’s maximum force (and not a tiny fraction of it) with all the conventional means at its disposal. All the military and infrastructural targets will be attacked with no consideration for ‘human shields’ or ‘environmental damage’. It is enough that we are hitting exact targets and that we gave them advance warning.

Siege – Parallel to the above, a total siege on Gaza. Nothing will enter the area. Israel, however, will allow exit from Gaza. (Civilians may go to Sinai, fighters may surrender to IDF forces).

Defense – Any place from which Israel or Israel’s forces were attacked will be immediately attacked with full force and no consideration for ‘human shields’ or ‘environmental damage’.

Conquer – After the IDF completes the "softening" of the targets with its fire-power, the IDF will conquer the entire Gaza, using all the means necessary to minimize any harm to our soldiers, with no other considerations.

Elimination- The GSS and IDF will thoroughly eliminate all armed enemies from Gaza. b[]The enemy population that is innocent of wrong-doing and separated itself from the armed terrorists will be treated in accordance with international law and will be allowed to leave. Israel will generously aid those who wish to leave.[/b]

Sovereignty – Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever. Liberation of parts of our land forever is the only thing that justifies endangering our soldiers in battle to capture land. Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel. The coastal train line will be extended, as soon as possible, to reach the entire length of Gaza.

According to polls, most of the Arabs in Gaza wish to leave. Those who were not involved in anti-Israel activity will be offered a generous international emigration package. Those who choose to remain will receive permanent resident status. After a number of years of living in Israel and becoming accustomed to it, contingent on appropriate legislation in the Knesset and the authorization of the Minister of Interior, those who personally accept upon themselves Israel’s rule, substance and way of life of the Jewish State in its Land, will be offered Israeli citizenship.
Moshe Zalman Feiglin (Hebrew: משה פייגלין‎, born 31 July 1962) is an Israeli politician and columnist. He is Deputy Speaker of the Knesset, Knesset Member, and head of the Manhigut Yehudit ("Jewish Leadership") faction of Israel's governing Likud party.
 
Israelis kidnapped and murdered the three Israeli teenagers? Israel is attacking Gaza because of natural gas?
Here you go bud.
Thanks pal,
There is no evidence supporting Hamas having killed those three teenagers, and even if he did, what gave Israel the right to kill innocent civilians? Israel isn't defending itself, the death toll speaks for itself.

Of course is over resources, it's always over resources. Look at 911, that was all for oil, go on label me with a dumb hat, just because I don't buy into the corporate press that have been consistently lying time and again, yet you expect me to suddenly believe them now? U.S. donates 'sympathy money' (3 billion dollars every year and the US is in debt) to Israel out of taxpayers money, Israel/Zionists own America, they're buddies, of course U.S. state own media won't back talk Israel.
 
It is never the answer. You should no better than to suggest that people should stay oppressed.

You guys are acting like there has never been nonviolent resistance, ever, that has worked out for anyone. Hamas will never be a part of a 2 state solution, Israel won't allow it.
 
Tell me if I have this wrong in some way: Hamas tactically fortified themselves in civilian areas and are Israel wouldn't be able to attack these known places without civilian death? It sounds like nobody could win in that situation.
 
murdering civilians and their families doesn't end Hamas

instead a child who saw their family murdered in front of them (or even a parent) will just harbour revenge

then what? you'll just kill them all?
 
Thanks pal,
There is no evidence supporting Hamas having killed those three teenagers, and even if he did, what gave Israel the right to kill innocent civilians? Israel isn't defending itself, the death toll speaks for itself.

Of course is over resources, it's always over resources. Look at 911, that was all for oil, go on label me with a dumb hat, just because I don't buy into the corporate press that have been consistently lying time and again, yet you expect me to suddenly believe them now? U.S. donates 'sympathy money' (3 billion dollars every year and the US is in debt) to Israel out of taxpayers money, Israel/Zionists own America, they're buddies, of course U.S. state own media won't back talk Israel.

In your opinion, who's backing up Hamas? I mean they keep getting updated weapons with every insurgence...Red Cross? UN? Russia?
 


Sovereignty – Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever. Liberation of parts of our land forever is the only thing that justifies endangering our soldiers in battle to capture land. Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel. The coastal train line will be extended, as soon as possible, to reach the entire length of Gaza.

According to polls, most of the Arabs in Gaza wish to leave. Those who were not involved in anti-Israel activity will be offered a generous international emigration package. Those who choose to remain will receive permanent resident status. After a number of years of living in Israel and becoming accustomed to it, contingent on appropriate legislation in the Knesset and the authorization of the Minister of Interior, those who personally accept upon themselves Israel’s rule, substance and way of life of the Jewish State in its Land, will be offered Israeli citizenship.

Disgusting.
 
And if you actually believe that people like Netanyahou don't have very similar desires, yet are smarter about what they say and how they execute, then you haven't been paying attention.

I have plenty of bigots in my country's government who will spew racial bullshit all the time but they have yet to go on a children murder spree.

That said, I sincerely hope that you are mistaken and the majority do not share these opinions.
 
In April, a unity government was formed between the PA and Hamas. Netanyahu was enraged by the unity government - and he called the US and EU to break relations with the unity government. Surprisingly, the US said no - that they would give the unity government time and see if it works or not. The EU said the same. Angered, Netanyahu was determined to break up the unity government. The 3 kids that were abducted was used as pretext, though there was no evidence of Hamas involvement. The pretext was to go into the West Bank, attack Hamas, arrest 700 members of Hamas, blow up 2 homes, carry on their ransackings, and to try to evoke a reaction from Hamas. An Israeli political scientist, Avner Yaniv calls these offensives, "Palestinian Peace Offenses" - whenever the Palestinians seemed like they tried to reach a settlement of the conflict (which the unity gov't was) at that point, Israel does everything it can to provoke a violent reaction from Hamas, who use force as a way to get international attention, and Israel has its pretext. And when the reaction comes, Israel can claim that they can't deal with these people, because they're terrorists. Hamas does some pretty despicable things, but I can see the frustration and hopelessness.

Your summary is abit biased no? netanyahu is pointed as the master schemer here when it could just as easily been the hamas, i dont think any side has proof of the other initiating this conflict. Hamas could say is was the rearrest of the just formerly released prisoners, and netanyahu could say its the murder and rockets shot at israel.
You show the PLO hamas agreement as if its some major initiative to reach peace with israel.. yeah right, that was an empty agreement, hamas are dying in gaza and they are clawing to hold on and that was the only pretense of that agreement, its not like PLO can say no to hahams, and we both know hamas is at no point of making anything near to peace with israel.
Also you should point out hamas terms for ceasefire has actually little to do with israel, they want money to be able to keep their hold over the citizens (which would come from qatar), and for Egypt to allow them to use their borders again.
So i think some of these additional point would be used to argue that hamas is the one who wanted to initiate this whole thing to be able to try and leverage themselves back to a point of power and relevancy, and not just some netanyahu scheme.
 
Tell me if I have this wrong in some way: Hamas tactically fortified themselves in civilian areas and are Israel wouldn't be able to attack these known places without civilian death? It sounds like nobody could win in that situation.

What exactly are "civilian areas" in Gaza and what are military areas?
 
You guys are acting like there has never been nonviolent resistance, ever, that has worked out for anyone. Hamas will never be a part of a 2 state solution, Israel won't allow it.
Non violence has lost them more land, and led to a faster growth in illegal Israeli settlement expansion than ever before. Simply sitting around letting your homes be destroyed and your people scattered is not the answer. At least if they resist, people are drawn to their plight and the international community can do more in terms of pressure, especially economically and in terms of sanctions or boycotts.
 
Tell me if I have this wrong in some way: Hamas tactically fortified themselves in civilian areas and are Israel wouldn't be able to attack these known places without civilian death? It sounds like nobody could win in that situation.

This is exactly what's happening.
 
You guys are acting like there has never been nonviolent resistance, ever, that has worked out for anyone. Hamas will never be a part of a 2 state solution, Israel won't allow it.
That's because Israel will never allow the two station solution. They've done everything in their power to make sure it doesn't happen, even before the rise of Hamas.
 
Yea, asking people for their support and paying your students $2000 each for doing it, not quite the same thing.

Side note, is this source/translation legitimate?

You routinely use MEMRI as a source (like for the translation link here), a known propaganda tool, criticised by many (journalists and political scientists alike) for its misleading tact, and founded by right wing zionists (by their own admission) including ex Israeli intelligence.

I saw on the previous page you posted a link from The Blaze. You do realise this is a site owned by Glenn Beck? Another right wing hack, and another source that is unreliable and pushing it's own slanted narrative.

Like I said earlier, please try and find better sources for these news pieces if you want to be taken more seriously.

How is that even comparable to the JIDF and how it operates?

And linking to MEMRI translations? Seriously?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/aug/12/worlddispatch.brianwhitaker

Ah! I see you guys have already seen the video. Following instructions to a tee!

"Beware of spreading rumors from Israeli spokesmen, particularly those that harm the home front. Be wary regarding accepting the occupation's version [of events]. You must always cast doubts on this [version], disprove it, and treat it as false.
 
These magic "stones" just blew up an APC with 7 soldiers inside, along with another 6 others using RPGs, AK's, etc. Hamas is well funded and well equip.
The same APC that senior IDF officers were strictly against sending out? The same APC that were 50 years old? Of course Gaza is going to try and fight back, at least it was soldiers and not civilians. However you should ask yourself why did they send an old rusty tin bucket out in the Gaza strip, goes to show how much they care about there own soldiers.

BTW is it even confirmed that they were hit by RPGs? If so, by whom then? Israel openly admit to dropping over 400 tonnes of bombs on innocent civilians...

I was talking about the civilians fighting back, not Hamas' soldiers, there are little kids pelting stones at tanks for Christ sake!
 
As shitty as this situation is, it's amazing that people think that Israel should just turn the other cheek when almost 2000 rockets have been launched into their country over the last month.
 
You guys are acting like there has never been nonviolent resistance, ever, that has worked out for anyone. Hamas will never be a part of a 2 state solution, Israel won't allow it.

I am not condoning violence but you can't compare this situation to others where peace movements have succeeded. The most comparable situation is that of south Africa and even then Nelson Mandela himself even after coming out of prison said that it was unfortunate that ANC had to use violent tactics but it was needed at the time. You have to look at the situation these people are in to see why they have to be using violence to have their voices heard. Ignoring that is folly.
 
Rockets aren't paper planes. Rockets kill people. It doesn't matter if Iron Dome shoots down 90% of them, if 1 gets through and kills a civilian it's too many 1. If the people of Palestine aren't interested in war with Israel then they shouldn't have elected Hamas. It's a recurring problem in the middle east that countries elect radical governments (the brotherhood in Egypt) and then act shocked whenever they're at war being used as human shields (hamas) or their own government begins treating them like subjects in a theocracy (muslim brotherhood) 2.

3Hamas' charter explicitly states they seek the destruction of Israel, and they routinely rocket civilian population centers, but I'm supposed to believe Israel is the bad guy here? Anytime civilians die due to the actions of a government, be it theirs or another, it is a tragedy. But Hamas shares equal blame in this, and condemning Israel after attacking Gaza is like condemning a bear that attacks after being poked with a stick for months.

1. The irony is thick.

2. Israel isn't a theocracy? Last I heard it defined itself as a "Jewish state".

3. They are the bad guys because their response is so disproportionate. Furthermore, a bear is incapable of rational dialogue and critical thinking so your analogy makes no sense. Also, let's not forget that prior to these "pokes" Israeli police had been beating up Palestinians. So it's not like it was out of nowhere.
 

Very interesting read..

Political talks would aim at achieving an agreement within certain limits, the economic approach would promote foreign and Arab investment and joint projects with
Israeli partners, while the security track would continue to build up the PA's security forces. In order to do any of this, Netanyahu noted, he will need a Palestinian partner.

PA Prime Minister Fayyad said he was happy with the PA's security forces, and they want to take on increased responsibility for security in Jericho and Jenin. Netanyahu replied that Israel would be happy to let them do more, but it is not clear what Hamas will do next. If Hamas forces a confrontation, Israel will have to initiate further military action in Gaza. Israel did not want to go back into Gaza, but it will do what is necessary to protect its people.

There is a consensus in the government and among 80% of the Israeli public that the Palestinians should be able to govern themselves. The only limits on Palestinian sovereignty would be elements that affect Israel's security. A Palestinian state must be demilitarized, without control over its air space and electro-magnetic field, and without the power to enter into treaties or control its borders.

Palestinians not only need to deal with terrorism, they also need a functioning legal system. Moving from a lawless system, the Palestinian Authority is showing
some pride, but police are not enough, they need courts and jails that work.
 
In your opinion, who's backing up Hamas? I mean they keep getting updated weapons with every insurgence...Red Cross? UN? Russia?
I still need to look into this more, I hate the fact we turned this into a political discussion when innocent lives are being annihilated. The pessimistic side of me says Gaza is going to be destroyed and 'humanity' (if we can even call ourselves humans anymore) will just move one and forget about this in time.
 
As shitty as this situation is, it's amazing that people think that Israel should just turn the other cheek when almost 2000 rockets have been launched into their country over the last month.

Given the near-inability of said rocket attacks to cause casualties on the Israeli side, juxtaposed against the hundreds of Palestinian civilians killed as a result of Israel's actions in response to said rocket attacks, it really shouldn't be cause for such incredulity.

The ideal solution would involve diplomacy, of course, but absent that...
 
As shitty as this situation is, it's amazing that people think that Israel should just turn the other cheek when almost 2000 rockets have been launched into their country over the last month.
It's also amazing that people think Palestinians should just do nothing when Israel continuously occupies their territories, steals their land and demolishes their structures, as they have done for decades on end.
 
I still need to look into this more, I hate the fact we turned this into a political discussion when innocent lives are being annihilated. The pessimistic side of me says Gaza is going to be destroyed and 'humanity' (if we can even call ourselves humans anymore) will just move one and forget about this in time.

I see.

This war is nothing, but political. What war isn't political?

Congress, Senate and Government heads should be the FIRST to send their sons and daughters to war...they're the ones that cause it really.
 
The fact is that Israel has for years intentionally kept Gaza, an open-air prison, as the brink of a humanitarian crisis. There are not "two sides"--there is a starved and desperate people, and there is an occupier with the most powerful military power in the world on its side. That's as one-sided as it gets.

Whats Israel's long term goal? Is causing so much death and suffering to Palestinians bringing them closer to it? What about the hundreds of thousands who have now lost family/friends, are are scarred for life with the carnage of death and destruction? Are these the people that Israel believes will be more amenable to compromise, instead of simply needing revenge because of their deep despair? Then what, Israel kills them all? Anyone who isn't a complete fucking idiot can see that the only strategy Israel has is one of unrelenting "war", because they know that radicalizing the Palestinians is to their benefit. It feeds their PR machine, and it destroys the chance of any kind of peace or palestinian state, things that Israel does not want.

Any positive development for Palestinians that could better their future that has been met with praise from the outside world (UN observer status, unity gvt) has been met with extreme anger, mockery, and then punishment from Israel. They wont have an ounce of goodwill towards the Palestinian people, nor any desire to see them better themselves and build a hopeful future. They've constantly torpedoes any chance of that, knowing that the result will give them pretext for further violence and oppression.
 
2. Israel isn't a theocracy? Last I heard it defined itself as a "Jewish state".

Probably one of the few times I'll say something in defense of Israel in this thread, but that's simply not what a theocracy is. Israel is not ruled by religious leaders (though it does accord certain rabbis more power than would be the case in a more purely secular nation), and does not have biblical or talmudic law as the basis for its system of government.
 
The same APC that senior IDF officers were strictly against sending out? The same APC that were 50 years old? Of course Gaza is going to try and fight back, at least it was soldiers and not civilians. However you should ask yourself why did they send an old rusty tin bucket out in the Gaza strip, goes to show how much they care about there own soldiers.

BTW is it even confirmed that they were hit by RPGs? If so, by whom then? Israel openly admit to dropping over 400 tonnes of bombs on innocent civilians...

I was talking about the civilians fighting back, not Hamas' soldiers, there are little kids pelting stones at tanks for Christ sake!

The article you linked says they were blown up by RPGs...

I don't really understand your point. The war is currently fought by Hamas Vs the IDF. There are militants on both sides, armed to the teeth.
 
As shitty as this situation is, it's amazing that people think that Israel should just turn the other cheek when almost 2000 rockets have been launched into their country over the last month.

As shitty as this situation is, it's amazing that people think that the Palestinians should just turn the other cheek as dozens of their women and children are massacred in a few days.

See how easy that was?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom