Doczu
Member
Can't wait to see those ps1 upscaled models.
Can't wait to see those PS1 upscaled backgrounds.
Can't wait to see those ps1 upscaled models.
![]()
I don't get it, it looks great, i mean look at the floor...
Like some have said, you could just as easily put the Wii version of REmake in your Wii U and get the same experience.
Well said.
How or why you'd defend the billion dollar corporation to not spend a little extra effort to maximizing the quality of their product, must have an associated mental disorder.
I get it. They don't owe us anything, but why support such poor output.
The Last of Us on PS4.. That's a great remaster.
From reading the thread, my take is the image on the left is a down-sampled version of the HD remaster so you can't see the actual 2D pre-rendered backgrounds are not higher quality in this new version, and the image on the right is a degraded version of the GCN release, so it looks a lot worse there than it actually does when running off a GCN. A direct screenshot of that exact scene running on Dolphin was posted in the thread a few pages back, and it looks every bit as sharp and clear as the down-sampled version on the left.
Even that screenshot is filtered and looks a bit rough, though it doesn't seem as bad. I'm gonna wait for direct footage, I'd assume if there's a filter option Capcom will let you disable it.
Gotta sell my GCN version while it's still worth something.
And suddenly early 2015 seemed so far away.
but that's not running on my PC!
Just scanning through this thread, it's crazy to me to see how many people are saying things like "I finally get to play this"
I first played this game in 1997
No, no you didn't.
Even that screenshot is filtered and looks a bit rough, though it doesn't seem as bad. I'm gonna wait for direct footage, I'd assume if there's a filter option Capcom will let you disable it.
Well nobody will force them to pay for it full price. And we don't know from now 'till November 2014 if they can optimize it and make it look better. If it ends up a shit port they will just wait for a 70% discount sale...
The main hall, dining hall, hall of mirrors, and the first zombie cutscene look off, but I wouldn't say terrible. Yet the kitchen, lab, and other scenes that utilize soft whites, greys, and blues look fantastic despite the odd object depths.
This may be a lazy port/remaster. But if this is complete shit, then I suggest getting out more.
Yes, let's instead only look at the "best" screenshots and bury our heads in the sand regarding the "remastering" of this port.
Just scanning through this thread, it's crazy to me to see how many people are saying things like "I finally get to play this"
I first played this game in 1997
I'm getting old :lol
Both of those comparisons are unfair. The sales increased for the PS2 largely due to a much larger userbase, and comparing the sales of RE5 to the Wii RE4 port is just ridiculous.
I can tell the difference just by looking at it. A cropped 480 image blown up to 720? Looks bad. The screenshots tell us exactly what we want to know: how is it remastered or ported? The answer is "badly."
If people want to play a worse version of the game, they're about to get the option. That doesn't stop my ire at Capcom for releasing this. Gamers would be better served by buying a Wii or a Gamecube.
It doesn't matter if you spin it as a port, a remake, or a remaster - it looks bad.
I wish people would stop using the worst screenshot of this game that exists.
![]()
Lets hope that the "2015" release of the X1 and PS4 versions means they're doing more for them.
Perhaps the PS360 release will be re-using the lo-res backgrounds and we'll get lucky with the 1080p release in 2015 on X1/PS4.
PLEASE Capcom!
Awesome news. My only hope is for Resident Evil 0 to follow, and how about RE4 PS4 with a platinum trophy for godsakes.
How else were they going to do it? Cut off the top and bottom of the scene and not scroll? Find a magic lamp and wish for more art to the sides to keep the entire scene visible in widescreen? Not have a widescreen mode at all?
This is lazy, nobody cares to play an old game like that anymore. They should have made a new Resident Evil one, like Tomb Raider did for the Tomb Raider series.
This is awesome news... now work on part 2, 3 and code veronica and its on!!!!!!!!!
I don't get this line of thinking. How would the wii or gamecube version be better than this one? Maybe you're talking about emulating them? Some people don't like to emulate games or don't have the hardware to do it.
The original mansion was an actual 3D asset they essentially took screenshots of to create the backgrounds was it not? Why can't they go back and re-render these backgrounds in true high resolution to get that extra art on the side? Do they not keep the original assets of games they developed somewhere? That's the only thing I can think of that is legitimately preventing them to do it.
Well, we are coming up on 10 years since Capcom got out of the contract and announced a PS2 port of RE4. 10 is a nice, round number.What does this say about Capcoms contract with Nintendo for this game? I always assumed it had stayed on Nintendo-plattforms because of some kind of money-hat. What should we assume? Was the money-hat timed, or did it just stay with Nintendo for no other reason than "lol Capcom"?
I got excited reading the thread title. Then I saw the screens... Oh Cacpcom, how can you call this 'HD remaster', you truly have no shame.
![]()
The dream is dead.
so no re-REmake?
well, I own the GameCube version, so no need for this..
Nah it's more of a REpackaging
Nah it's more of a REpackaging
I might buy this if its between $6.99 and $9.99.
I think that's a fair price for basically just the privilege of playing the game on a Next Gen console, since they didn't bother much with improving the actual assets, for one reason or another.
The original mansion was an actual 3D asset they essentially took screenshots of to create the backgrounds was it not? Why can't they go back and re-render these backgrounds in true high resolution to get that extra art on the side? Do they not keep the original assets of games they developed somewhere? That's the only thing I can think of that is legitimately preventing them to do it.