benjipwns
Banned
Like federal grants can't be used to dictate a local drinking age?Federal grants cannot be used to dictate that local police wear cameras.
Like federal grants can't be used to dictate a local drinking age?Federal grants cannot be used to dictate that local police wear cameras.
from what I understand, there was a regular bottle that was thrown and smashed against a vehicle. the Molotov stuff came later.So I have a question. I heard everything popped off because of a bottle. Was that Molotov Cocktail the 'bottle' they were talking about?
The federal government funds the Army, they do not fund local police and do not have the power to force local police to wear such things. I'm all for progress in policing but suggestions that have no basis in the reality of our structure of government aren't very helpful.
Federal grants cannot be used to dictate that local police wear cameras.
So I have a question. I heard everything popped off because of a bottle. Was that Molotov Cocktail the 'bottle' they were talking about?
Federal grants cannot be used to dictate that local police wear cameras.
Like federal grants can't be used to dictate a local drinking age?
Which is why the police would be wearing lapel cameras.Because the situations are completely comparable. No politician would risk letting a police force dry up because they don't want to wear lapel cameras. That would be political suicide.
From what I was watching there was an earlier bottle thrown at one of the armored vehicles and that was the initial event that started the shit; the molotov came after that. But that's just what witnesses were saying, I don't think there was video.
Because the situations are completely comparable. No politician would risk letting a police force dry up because they don't want to wear lapel cameras. That would be political suicide.
Because the situations are completely comparable. No politician would risk letting a police force dry up because they don't want to wear lapel cameras. That would be political suicide.
Protesters don't have a right to be angry and request radical changes in the police/community unless they provide a proposal within legal limits as to how this would be accomplished.
If they can't do this, well then they should just shut up and go home.
Police are like Sea Monkeys, you have to keep them in water.What do you mean by "dry up"?
Because the situations are completely comparable. No politician would risk letting a police force dry up because they don't want to wear lapel cameras. That would be political suicide.
you were pretending it was inconceivable because of federal rules earlier. Now its not possible because of politicians.
you were pretending it was inconceivable because of federal rules earlier. Now its not possible because of politicians.
How would they pay for this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YUm9xgN6m0
^^^the first molotov, which started tonight's festivities, was thrown by a 'peaceful protester' at 4 hours 14 minutes 32 seconds
They're asking them not to shoot black people all the time. They propose the police stop shooting so many black people to accomplish this goal.Protesters don't have a right to be angry and request radical changes in the police/community unless they provide a proposal within legal limits as to how this would be accomplished.
If they can't do this, well then they should just shut up and go home.
Is this a joke or something?
Make them grants to the states as part of a big enough package and the local PD's aren't going to get much of a say.Federal grants provide money to local police departments however they are not the main source of funding for your local town PD. You could certainly tie the need to take certain grant money to the condition that you have to spend it on these cameras. It is of my opinion that a large number of PD's would opt out of receiving that funding and politicians who were behind it would be seen and portrayed as defunding police. Thus I think it would be political suicide.
That is how I view how video cameras being tied to federal grants would work out. With extreme resistance.
Make them grants to the states as part of a big enough package and the local PD's aren't going to get much of a say.
In the current political climate, red states will just refuse the money. Just like they did with local aid in the bailouts, medicaid expansion from the ACA, and now school lunch funding.
Protesters don't have a right to be angry and request radical changes in the police/community unless they provide a proposal within legal limits as to how this would be accomplished.
If they can't do this, well then they should just shut up and go home.
They're asking them not to shoot black people all the time. They propose the police stop shooting so many black people to accomplish this goal.
State grants would make more sense but seeing as we didn't have the political will power to put limits on guns after elementary students were gunned down I don't have the optimism that this is going to be the event that garners what would most likely be necessary congressional support to make such a change.
That's exactly how I feel.
California police use of body cameras cuts violence and complaints
Body cameras worn by police in Rialto, California have resulted in better policing – and now other forces may follow suit
Upon returning to Rialto (city motto: "bridge to progress") he obtained $100,000 (£62,640) in state and federal funding for the Taser-made cameras – about $1,000 each – plus servers and fibre-optic cables. Each officer has his or her own camera, mounted on collars, spectacles or caps, and is expected to activate it during interactions with the public. Encounters are logged and uploaded to a secure digital cloud service, evidence.com.
Was being sarcastic.
Unrelated but, F U C K T H E P O L I C E.
.@mebbela: Hey #Ferguson, you've officially made the front page of Australian news. #TheWorldisWatching http://t.co/Zo6YMAoFr4
So are we talking about capability, possibility or likelihood here? Because it seemed like you originally started with the position that the federal government doesn't fund local police, not that it's not politically unlikely.State grants would make more sense but seeing as we didn't have the political will power to put limits on guns after elementary students were gunned down I don't have the optimism that this is going to be the event that garners what would most likely be necessary congressional support to make such a change.
Don't try to legalize gay marriage in blue states, because the red ones aren't gonna go with it.
said no one here ever.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-body-cameras-cuts-violence-complaints-rialto
Stop covering your ears and eyes and repeating its impossible to do.
So are we talking about capability, possibility or likelihood here? Because it seemed like you originally started with the position that the federal government doesn't fund local police, not that it's not politically unlikely.
Insensitive, they're called Albinos.yeah but gay people are often white. they even live in white middle class communities!
have you ever seen a white black person? I didn't think so.
Oh, well, might as well just forget about it then. Probably shouldn't have tried to expand Medicaid either.Great California did it. That's going to solve the problem across the nation. California also expanded medicaid for which I applaud them. Red states will not do that.
The federal government funds the Army, they do not fund local police and do not have the power to force local police to wear such things. I'm all for progress in policing but suggestions that have no basis in the reality of our structure of government aren't very helpful.
Great California did it. That's going to solve the problem across the nation. California also expanded medicaid for which I applaud them. Red states will not do that.
In hopes white people give a shit?Why are some black celebs trying to remind me that this "goes beyond color"?
Oh, well, might as well just forget about it then. Probably shouldn't have tried to expand Medicaid either.
Your points are meandering. And oddly enough, are now mirroring Angry Forks sarcasm. They used federal and state funding to pull it off. Its a model.
Red states weren't going to let blacks go to school or vote either. Things have a way of changing when effort instead of pathetic excuses are made. But it takes at least a budding attitude of possibility. I listed a multiple source of money that could get into the hands of PD's nation wide. You focused on one. State & Federal funding can solve the problem, and the rest of the states will be brought to modern times kicking and screaming as always.
Why are some black celebs trying to remind me that this "goes beyond color"?
Aiming for mystical negro points?In hopes white people give a shit?
@CassFM: PHOTOS: Police fire tear gas near Al Jazeera crew, then disassemble the gear after they flee. #Ferguson http://t.co/It5FOxVWhB
That doesn't sound legal.
Click link for pics.
That doesn't sound legal.
Click link for pics.