Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uh shouldn't the state be getting involved at this point? Or at least some higher authority? This is getting out of hand now...Media is denied, meaning most information is strictly from citizen point of view through what ever media they use. The force being used is extreme especially for a protest that is similar to ones over 50's ago in other states. Than again, they decided to use fire hoses...
 
I'm not sure if it was a cocktail or not. It seems to be what started everything tonight though.

It looks like a bottle and the glass was reflecting the light, so it looked like it was lit. For one thing, I don't recall a corresponding are on fire as one would expect.
 
I'm not sure if it was a cocktail or not. It seems to be what started everything tonight though.

I would say that a bottle shouldn't have started all of this. BUT, they were out in their full costumes. They were waiting for anything to justify them today. Restraint isn't being shown at all in the face of actual challenges.

A bottle vs armor doesn't require the legion to attack. Now, if the protestors were all rushing and rioting, of course. Disperse them.

This whole situation should have been handled without unleashing riot police at a vigil to begin with. Its all been down hill since, and these dolts are out of control.
 
Who is the founder of "modern liberalism?" Define liberalism for that matter. I'd throw other questions at you but your preface of "from where I stand" is parsed as 'in my opinion' so it's pointless.
John Stuart Mill the author of On Liberty.

Even though you're being condescending I'll entertain your second question.

Liberalism or liberal humanism can be defined as the idea that people and institutions can be improved. It features individualism, universalism, and egalitarianism as core concepts.

liberal humanism is only thought of with white property owning men in mind because other classes of people were seen as sub persons in its history. so that's where things get messy and why we're having this conversation.
 
Not from my experience. Liberals here stand on platforms like legalize and weed and gay marriage which I guess is progressive but by and large the ideology itself is very individualistic. Liberals are usually the people who say shit like "I don't see race" and subscribe to respectability politics. They don't support affirmative action because it's seen as preferential treatment to them. In other words they don't want govt intervention on such issues as these are individual problems. Getting them to recognize institutional problems is very hard as it conflicts with their ideologies. Just what I think. Fun fact the founder of moden liberalism supported the slave trade and the Native American genocide with the ideology.

I dunno, that's not been my general experience, how I've used the word or how I've seen others I interact with use the word. I've seen those who call themselves liberals say the sort of things in the beginning of your paragraph due to ignorance or naivete but I wouldn't use the term liberal to describe someone who said the bolded nor have I ever encounter someone who called themselves a liberal and believed/said something like the bolded. There is more than one kind of liberalism/conservatism though so maybe we are using different types as our default?

You would think that I'm talking about libertarians but this is what people in this country who call themselves liberals cosign on. In American we have a saying that republicans and democrats are exactly the same it's just that one of them knows how to hide their bullshit better than the other.

People say that but do you personally believe that? Considering the political landscape for the past few years I just can't agree (Which is different than the parties being more similar than one would like)

He means Andrew Jackson, who founded the Democratic party.

I was going to look up modern liberalism to see who he meant but if that's what he meant than its a worthless statement considering what happened to the composition of the parties after the 60s (which I would think he would know about)

EDIT: I guess that wasn't who he meant.
 
is crossfire going on over here.. or something.. :P

im exhausted of all this racism. hitting the bed.. again.

edit:

errr i mean carefully laying in the bed and making no threats to anyone. Not hitting.
 
Just to avoid being fully biased...

In defense of the police force, they would have no knowledge of what the object thrown at them was, and how much worse the crowd could get. Now it doesn't merit any of the behavior the police force has exhibited, I can see why they would have become slightly concerned.

Still they don't get any excuse for being so awful tonight, and there is no logical reason to freak out the way they did about the bottle. Disgusting display of a 'public service.' They got a reason to take action though, even if it was extremely minor, and even if the actions they took were... misguided to say the very least.
 
is crossfire going on over here.. or something.. :P

im exhausted of all this racism. hitting the bed.. again.

edit:

errr i mean carefully laying in the bed and making no threats to anyone. Not hitting.

Oh good, You're just peacefully sleeping. That means you get forty whole minutes before the teargas you.
 
John Stuart Mill the author of On Liberty.

Even though you're being condescending I'll entertain your second question.

Liberalism or liberal humanism can be defined as the idea that people and institutions can be improved. It features individualism, universalism, and egalitarianism as core concepts.

liberal humanism is only thought of with white property owning men in mind because other classes of people were seen as sub persons in its history. so that's where things get messy and why we're having this conversation.

This isn't how liberalism is defined in modern American politics. John Stuart Mill certainly isn't the father of it.
 
John Stuart Mill is considered the most influential philosopher of his time. To say he didn't shape modern liberalism is absurd.

Good thing I didn't say that. But you claimed that "the founder of moden liberalism supported the slave trade and the Native American genocide with the ideology." And that's just a ridiculous thing to say. But this is getting off-topic.
 
Good thing I didn't say that. But you claimed that "the founder of moden liberalism supported the slave trade and the Native American genocide with the ideology." And that's just a ridiculous thing to say. But this is getting off-topic.

Yes he did support slavery and colonialism. Yes he shaped modern liberalism so calling him the "father" of it isn't an exaggeration. Nothing I said was a lie. But I guess this is getting off topic.
 
This country man.. This country.. I ain't what it used to be.

The military morals are at its lowest & it doesn't feel like "land of the free" anymore
 
I hope people retweet the hell out of that picture. People need to see what a rubber bullet can do.

Everyone will just forget in a month like they did after the Occupy protesters got hit with them. I have no faith that this will lead to anything transformational.
 
Everyone will just forget in a month like they did after the Occupy protesters got hit with them. I have no faith that this will lead to anything transformational.

Part of me fear this as well. No one remembers how bad the riots here got. I want to say that the way the police are acting will keep this in the memory of everyone, but unfortunately I still fear this will be forgotten and repeated.
 

It's true, but of course nobody wants to die.
Unfortunately I don't think real change is possible without it. unless we all want to wait several more decades. I doubt justice is imminent, and if there isn't a real impact made now this will fade into the background and nobody will remember it.

the other issue, of course, is that the police are so militarized that things would be very one-sided.

But I think that's what America needs to see I'm order to change, to be honest.
and of course the scary thing is that might not even be enough to wake people up.
 
iIeal72vTTjN4.gif

Idiots like this cause deaths. That's all it needs. One amongst hundreds to spark a riot
 
Absence of NRA/conservative/libertarian outrage is incontrovertible proof they only represent white America. #ferguson

It just lays out plain and clear what those kind of people are really about, their hypocrisy, not whether this action should actually be taken.
And that is a load of shit by people trying to politicize for their own gain.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...about-police-misconduct-in-ferguson-missouri/

But hey I am sure glad all those Democrats are rushing to speak out. Thank God they have a Democrat as Governor instead of a Republican so they can do right by the people. Oh wait...
 
Absence of NRA/conservative/libertarian outrage is incontrovertible proof they only represent white America. #ferguson

It just lays out plain and clear what those kind of people are really about, their hypocrisy, not whether this action should actually be taken.

I'm not getting where people are finding this "lack" if libertarian outrage. I've seen it quite a lot in libertarian circles.

are they expecting some libertarian congressional leader to make a statement or something? or is this liberals trying to point at something to assuage guilt and frustration over their party (the one in power) being cautious and timid over the situation?
 
He's right though. You can't say it's a peaceful protest (even if it is) when you have idiots like that throwing bottles / molotov cocktails.

He is not right. The police escalated the situation, mocking the people even with SWAT teams and full combat armor now.

That's not how you de-escalate things.
 
Please show us. Nobody wants false information.
Reason.com has quite a bit on it.

http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/13/how-a-suburban-swat-team-sees-itself

http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/13/officer-who-shot-mike-brown-might-face-t

http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/14/ferguson-police-may-have-arrested-st-lou

http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/13/another-confrontation-potentially-brewin

.. plenty more there if you want to browse.


Radley Balko, a libertarian, wrote that "rise of the warrior cop" book that's been posted in here several times, and he's posted about Ferguson a lot on his Twitter, @radleybalko and possibly elsewhere.

here's an article from the Cato institute. libertarian think tank: http://www.cato.org/blog/police-militarization-ferguson-nationwide


mostly I'm not sure what people expect. libertarians hold little political power. but they're still the most vocal I've seen against the militarization of the police and the protection of our civil liberties from government "law enforcement"
 
Wesley's words and footage got a brief mention just now on the national news: Today Show.

The level of force being used by the cops is ridiculous. I'm worried the more this goes on, the more tired they are going to get and eventually make a really bad decision that will set this over the top.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom