• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brown was shot because he matched the description of a black guy who might or might not have taken some swisher sweets.

The black guy in the QT video would be presumed innocent until proven guilty. We don't even know if an actual robbery took place. But Brown was killed because he matched the description of a guy who might or might not have taken a 3 dollar pack of cigars.
 
The clothing of the guy in the video doesn't match the pic of Brown's dead body.

In the video, the guy is wearing a longer shirt, a hat, dark shorts, and socks with sandals.

In the pic of Brown's dead body, he is wearing a tighter shirt, tan shorts that are sagging below his hips, shoes and no hat.

Two different people IMO.

Thats what it looks like to me too. The pics are pretty grainy and sun drenched. Its really hard to get any hard details, other than the hat.

EDIT: right on CNN's front page. Police accuse Michael Brown of robbery:
http://www.cnn.com/?refresh=1
 
The clothing of the guy in the video doesn't match the pic of Brown's dead body.

In the video, the guy is wearing a longer shirt, a hat, dark shorts, and socks with sandals.

In the pic of Brown's dead body, he is wearing a tighter shirt, tan shorts that are sagging below his hips, shoes and no hat.

Two different people IMO.

Exactly ! The only similarities are race, the shirt, and maybe the shoes (cant tell though cause of both pics being eh on the feet part).

This is fucked.
 
hfqhfy.png

So they are creating a whole new narrative?

They basically just writing fanfiction right now. I hope it all blows up in their faces.
 
Quite the expert legal opinion you're providing there.



(Not making a comment on this case in particular, just at how ridiculous some of these posts are.)
I was referring to the monetary value of the stolen goods. In many cases this matters. Clearly he is a hardend criminal deserving the execution he received.
 
Brown was shot because he matched the description of a black guy who might or might not have taken some swisher sweets.

The black guy in the QT video would be presumed innocent until proven guilty. We don't even know if an actual robbery took place. But Brown was killed because he matched the description of a guy who might or might not have taken a 3 dollar pack of cigars.

Are you referencing the photos above as the "QT Video"? I ask because all QT employees wear red shirts and khaki pants/shorts. So if that is the store clerk in the video, that was probably not at a QT.
 
I'm so disgusted by this turn of events. I shouldn't be surprised that the police are trying to do this, but somehow I still am.

Police Chief needs to be arrested along with Wilson.
 
I assume the media does indeed have access to photos of the dead body correct? So it should be easy for them to do a side by side comparison. That's if they even care to do so.
 
Brown was shot because he matched the description of a black guy who might or might not have taken some swisher sweets.

The black guy in the QT video would be presumed innocent until proven guilty. We don't even know if an actual robbery took place. But Brown was killed because he matched the description of a guy who might or might not have taken a 3 dollar pack of cigars.

Give me a tshirt and a cap and put me on video and I match that description. Big and Tall Black dude. Amazing my life can be snuffed out cause I match a description.

Meanwhile in America....
 
Why can cell phones take better quality video than stand alone security systems?

Overpriced, old security systems probably. Wouldn't surprise me if this store's camera was made in 2003 and is hooked up to an ancient eMachines that can't even capture/render video at 240p.
 
I hate to be that guy in the thread, but I was busy last night. Can I get a recap of last night to today?

Released the cop's name
Highway Patrol officer marched with people last night
No real riots/trouble

Is that it? And now it's coming out that Brown was involved in "something" that day?
There were some problems with the the protests last night but nothing too major fortunately.
 
Not that it really matters or anything...

The surveillance tape likely wouldn't have even been a silver bullet or anything. He matched a description, they would've questioned him, investigated him, done normal police procedure stuff. That can't happen anymore so all the tape does is confirm the idea that they approached him because he matched a description. And because he matched a description, everything unfolded that resulted in his death. So maybe he was the guy or maybe he just matched the description. The events still unfolded, they were still unjustified, and the causes behind the escalation have always existed.

It doesn't matter...
 
The clothing of the guy in the video doesn't match the pic of Brown's dead body.

In the video, the guy is wearing a longer shirt, a hat, dark shorts, and socks with sandals.

In the pic of Brown's dead body, he is wearing a tighter shirt, tan shorts that are sagging below his hips, shoes and no hat.

Two different people IMO.

1sOJ71m.jpg


Picture on the bottom left seems to show the pants possibly being a light tan. It could just be a matter of lighting for the "dark shorts".

...That being said, though, the picture of his body shows him wearing something blue or black at his waist. I don't know if that's just blood or what.
 
It's not fair but this is enough for the general public to stop caring about this story and deem him a criminal. This story is going to quickly fizzle out from here....:(
 
Why can cell phones take better quality video than stand alone security systems?

Because most are probably very outdated technology-wise. We update our phones every two years, but most video security systems might get updated every decade, maybe? And a smaller business like a franchised QuikTrip might do it less frequently than that because of the costs associated with it.
 
Are you referencing the photos above as the "QT Video"? I ask because all QT employees wear red shirts and khaki pants/shorts. So if that is the store clerk in the video, that was probably not at a QT.

Thought I read it was a QT in the police report but it wasn't you're right.
 
Regardless of if he did shoplift and whether or not the pictures match, he didn't deserve to die. It still doesn't make this okay. Not even in the slightest.
 
Clothes look the same to me. The shorts are sundrenched in the robbery picture, making them seem darker than normal. I don't know where the hat went, though.
 
I keep going back and forth on whether or not the robbery suspect is Mike Brown. At first, I thought no... but it seems like both Mike Brown and the man in the robbery have some kind of distinctive pattern on their socks. I'm starting to think that was indeed Mike Brown.

Doesn't mean he should've been shot, though.
 
Brown was shot because he matched the description of a black guy who might or might not have taken some swisher sweets.

The black guy in the QT video would be presumed innocent until proven guilty. We don't even know if an actual robbery took place. But Brown was killed because he matched the description of a guy who might or might not have taken a 3 dollar pack of cigars.
No, he was shot for presumably assaulting an officer and trying to get his gun. Seeing as how brown had no problem assaulting a tiny elderly person, it's possible he'd have no problem trying the same shit with a cop.
 
It is pretty eye opening reading the comments section of a fox news post on facebook. It is sad really how many ignorant people exist.
 
They said that Johnson was also in the store.

Versus Johnson saying he didnt meet up with the victim until later in the street.

Where is Johnson in the video?
 
That just about confirms it even more. That is the exact same hat that is in the main picture of him smiling. Sure, tons of those hats are out there, but going along with everything else it's pretty certain now.

It's a St-Louis Cardinals cap. People wearing Cards caps are a dime a dozen there, not conclusive evidence imo
 
So where are the cigars?

No, he was shot for presumably assaulting an officer and trying to get his gun. Seeing as how brown had no problem assaulting a tiny elderly person, it's possible he'd have no problem trying the same shit with a cop.

So, you're sure Brown was the guys in the video.
 
No, he was shot for presumably assaulting an officer and trying to get his gun. Seeing as how brown had no problem assaulting a tiny elderly person, it's possible he'd have no problem trying the same shit with a cop.

Woah shit what? Are you being sarcastic?

You were in the store when the tiny elderly person was roughed up? You were on the street when Brown was shot?

We don't even know if the guy in the video stole anything. We don't even know if the guy in the video was Brown.
 
even assuming that's him, YOU STILL DON'T GET TO SHOOT HIM

Wasn't the original story that he ran from the cop cruiser when they tried to question him? If he was a suspect for the robbery and then ran away when you attempted to question him, what would you do? There's like a two second window to make a decision and the cop chose to use his gun. Maybe he was trying to fire a warning shot, maybe he was out of range for the tazer, I don't know. All I do know is that you don't let a robbery suspect run away scot free after you attempt to question him.
That said, if the stories of Brown putting up his arms and surrendering are true, then it's clear the officer used excessive force and should be prosecuted.
Unless he actually tried to take the cops gun, then I don't know wtf happens. Crazy story all around.
 
I'd like to hear what the clerk or lady thinks. Brown has a distinct looking face to me. She should be able to tell based on photos whether this person was Brown.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom