I would love to see that happen for every officer in the country. Only obstacle should be cost.
It's odd, but probably a coincidence. Cardinals hats are probably everywhere.
![]()
the term is being used by the posters and the analysts to mean felony suspect, obviously not convicted felon. C'mon now.
He didn't try to detain him through the car window. Even the friend said the cop tried to exit the vehicle.
Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
YUP!Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
It's irrelevant. A red herring. Nothing that came out today makes Mike Brown's murder okay.
Basically the long and the short of it:
If the autopsy report shows the amount of shots the witnesses are claiming, none of this matters, right?
Since the witness accounts directly conflict with the cop's on this matter, it should be pretty straightforward.
It's st.louis who doesn't have a cardinals hat?They are everywhere. I wear one 90% of the time when I'm out.
It's odd, but probably a coincidence. Cardinals hats are probably everywhere.
![]()
Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
That has NOTHING to do with what I posted. I 100% stated he murdered the kid. I just am trying to put in my mind what happened at that moment. Determining exactly what happened is something people want to know, it doesn't change the fact Brown as killed by Wilson, but people still want to know the full story and I was just thinking about loud.
Re-read my post and see how I said nothing stated today makes his murder ok.
He is only assigned with Highway Patrol to assist with the protests. He is not part of the investigation.
Im not even sure one shot could possibly be justified.
But multiple? Impossible
Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
Collin Reischman ‏@Collin_MOTimes 2h
It's worth noting that on Tuesday Chief Jackson told me Brown was not being stopped in relation to any criminal activity.
Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
It's odd, but probably a coincidence. Cardinals hats are probably everywhere.
![]()
It's st.louis who doesn't have a cardinals hat?
Maybe you have a right of innocence till proven guilty as well.Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
Cops better get their story straight
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here. I know this is likely to piss a bunch of people off, but I feel the cops side of the story is not being represented. For the record.....Yes I am a white guy from the suburbs, and no I don't think its ok to shoot anybody in the back while they are running away.
The cop is responding to a report of a strong arm robbery. He sees a group of kids walking down the street that match the description, pulls over to question them, gets into an altercation with Brown. Brown pushes him into his car and a shot is fired during the struggle, at which point Brown gets startled and runs off. The officer shoots him as he is running away. Now, I've always been under the impression that cops are trained to refrain from shooting if they can, but once the first shot is fired they shoot to kill and shoot until the target is down. In this context, wouldn't he have done exactly what he was trained to do?
Again, I'm not trying to justify the shooting, just to shed some light on the other version of the incident
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here. I know this is likely to piss a bunch of people off, but I feel the cops side of the story is not being represented. For the record.....Yes I am a white guy from the suburbs, and no I don't think its ok to shoot anybody in the back while they are running away.
The cop is responding to a report of a strong arm robbery. He sees a group of kids walking down the street that match the description, pulls over to question them, gets into an altercation with Brown. Brown pushes him into his car and a shot is fired during the struggle, at which point Brown gets startled and runs off. The officer shoots him as he is running away. Now, I've always been under the impression that cops are trained to refrain from shooting if they can, but once the first shot is fired they shoot to kill and shoot until the target is down. In this context, wouldn't he have done exactly what he was trained to do?
Again, I'm not trying to justify the shooting, just to shed some light on the other version of the incident
He's also in charge of security right now.
It just seems like the Police Department and the Security force are working in completely different directions. Handing out a packet and not allowing questions. Actually, if I remember correctly, didn't the Police Chief say that the questions should be saved for Johnson? Why did he heap this shit on him without informing him of everything beforehand?
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here.
Again, I'm not trying to justify the shooting, just to shed some light on the other version of the incident
Many will..right here on NeoGAF IN THIS VERY THREAD! Let's watch!
Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here. I know this is likely to piss a bunch of people off, but I feel the cops side of the story is not being represented. For the record.....Yes I am a white guy from the suburbs, and no I don't think its ok to shoot anybody in the back while they are running away.
The cop is responding to a report of a strong arm robbery. He sees a group of kids walking down the street that match the description, pulls over to question them, gets into an altercation with Brown. Brown pushes him into his car and a shot is fired during the struggle, at which point Brown gets startled and runs off. The officer shoots him as he is running away. Now, I've always been under the impression that cops are trained to refrain from shooting if they can, but once the first shot is fired they shoot to kill and shoot until the target is down. In this context, wouldn't he have done exactly what he was trained to do?
Again, I'm not trying to justify the shooting, just to shed some light on the other version of the incident
Dogwhistle.
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here. I know this is likely to piss a bunch of people off, but I feel the cops side of the story is not being represented. For the record.....Yes I am a white guy from the suburbs, and no I don't think its ok to shoot anybody in the back while they are running away.
The cop is responding to a report of a strong arm robbery. He sees a group of kids walking down the street that match the description, pulls over to question them, gets into an altercation with Brown. Brown pushes him into his car and a shot is fired during the struggle, at which point Brown gets startled and runs off. The officer shoots him as he is running away. Now, I've always been under the impression that cops are trained to refrain from shooting if they can, but once the first shot is fired they shoot to kill and shoot until the target is down. In this context, wouldn't he have done exactly what he was trained to do?
Again, I'm not trying to justify the shooting, just to shed some light on the other version of the incident
Now, I've always been under the impression that cops are trained to refrain from shooting if they can, but once the first shot is fired they shoot to kill and shoot until the target is down. In this context, wouldn't he have done exactly what he was trained to do?
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here. I know this is likely to piss a bunch of people off, but I feel the cops side of the story is not being represented. For the record.....Yes I am a white guy from the suburbs, and no I don't think its ok to shoot anybody in the back while they are running away.
The cop is responding to a report of a strong arm robbery. He sees a group of kids walking down the street that match the description, pulls over to question them, gets into an altercation with Brown. Brown pushes him into his car and a shot is fired during the struggle, at which point Brown gets startled and runs off. The officer shoots him as he is running away. Now, I've always been under the impression that cops are trained to refrain from shooting if they can, but once the first shot is fired they shoot to kill and shoot until the target is down. In this context, wouldn't he have done exactly what he was trained to do?
Again, I'm not trying to justify the shooting, just to shed some light on the other version of the incident
St. Louis is Cardinal Nation. Its a baseball town first, so Cards hats are everywhere.
Hell, I'm wearing one now.
Is it true that the officer had to be treated at a hospital for injuries following the incident? Or is that a lie?
Maury, where are you?
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here. I know this is likely to piss a bunch of people off, but I feel the cops side of the story is not being represented. For the record.....Yes I am a white guy from the suburbs, and no I don't think its ok to shoot anybody in the back while they are running away.
The cop is responding to a report of a strong arm robbery. He sees a group of kids walking down the street that match the description, pulls over to question them, gets into an altercation with Brown. Brown pushes him into his car and a shot is fired during the struggle, at which point Brown gets startled and runs off. The officer shoots him as he is running away. Now, I've always been under the impression that cops are trained to refrain from shooting if they can, but once the first shot is fired they shoot to kill and shoot until the target is down. In this context, wouldn't he have done exactly what he was trained to do?
Again, I'm not trying to justify the shooting, just to shed some light on the other version of the incident
Someone get this clear for me,
He shoplifted cigarettes, and assaulted an elderly man. Then when the officer questioned him on the street, they supposedly got into a scuffle in the police cars driver window, where he tried to reach for the police officers gun(?).
I don't know if its all true, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt, but if it is, maybe you shouldn't do all that stuff if you don't want a risk of getting put into harms way.
Not saying its right what happened either if its true.
The Chief said that they would re-address the media later on today. It does seem that there are two separate levels being used here: the local/county PD, and the Highway Patrol for security measures. Seems like the highway patrol is Nixon's doing, hence why he's smugging behind Johnson on the mic now.
Ok. I'm going to play the devils advocate for a minute here.
Sigh...
this is gonna be just like the Travyon Martin threads with suburban white people wishing they could say more shit without behind banned, but settle for these devil's advocate scenarios.
I have nothing against anyone of any race, but I'm SO tired of people playing this fucking role on GAF
I'm out
On the same goddamn page.
I need a drink.
Next time you're thinking about playing the devils advocate, don't.
You're justifying his murder. Period.
This is really sad and unfairAfter the news today about him being a possible suspect or whatever, this is so much more relevant and laughably horrible.
White Suspects vs Black Victims in the Media
I don't live in STL, and even I have a Cardinals hat.
It's a very common red baseball cap with a timeless logo on it.
St. Louis is Cardinal Nation. Its a baseball town first, so Cards hats are everywhere.
Hell, I'm wearing one now.