• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Ferguson: Police Kill 18yo Black Male; Fire Gas/Rubber Bullets Into Protesting Crowds

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...erguson-cops-were-caught-in-a-bloody-lie.html
Police in Ferguson, Missouri, once charged a man with destruction of property for bleeding on their uniforms while four of them allegedly beat him.

“On and/or about the 20th day of Sept. 20, 2009 at or near 222 S. Florissant within the corporate limits of Ferguson, Missouri, the above named defendant did then and there unlawfully commit the offense of ‘property damage’ to wit did transfer blood to the uniform,” reads the charge sheet.
gg
 
How does this deny the friend's testimony, specially because the friend verified that he stole the cigs? What about the testimony of the second witness? And remember that the police declined on listening to the friend's testimony.

and why is everyone forgetting how the police have acted this entire time? The whole.. aiming sniper rifles at protesters/showing up with tanks to a vigil preemptively..thing.. the whole taunting.. the whole inept police chief.... the whole, dude drove away after he killed someone..? All of this is immediately eroded because you no longer have to factor those things in. There is no puzzle to solve. You saw a video that might be him shoving a clerk out of the way. -- So that means everything that has happened is within reason. He had a death wish, and wanted to kill a cop by getting caught walking down the street, and not for a robbery, then, hes going to jungle punch him and take the gun, shooting both cops dead? After stealing some cigars........? He doesn't even have a gun to do this mission?

For fucks sake people. This is just smearing a dead dude, without even being able to talk about the police officer. Because he RAN AWAY from the fucking scene and has stayed silent on the matter.
 
I agree. The sole focus at this point should be if the officer acted appropriately or not, given the outcome of his interaction with the suspect. What happened before that is immaterial.
 
What kind of leap in logic does it take to get from:

"Pushed store clerk" to "assaulted an officer"?

Robbing the store gives him a clear motivation to want to avoid the police. i.e. it makes no sense that someone who committed no crime would try to scuffle with a cop. That is the logical leap, the robbing of a store now establishes motivation for the actions that he allegedly took in the police report. Not that this is true, but it does make the police story slightly more plausible now. Obviously the coroner's report is what everyone really needs to see.
 
You are technically correct... if we ignore all the witnesses and only believe the assailants' version.

Also, the autopsy is done by the police themselves, who had the body for many days before the FBI (I assume) are able to take a look at it.

Are you implying a conspiracy. I would think it would be pretty clear to FBI if they tampered with the body.
 
I agree. The sole focus at this point should be if the officer acted appropriately or not, given the outcome of his interaction with the suspect. What happened before that is immaterial.

Yes, that's all that matters and we still have no official info really. No autopsy report, no verified or vetted testimony regarding the turn of events that led to the shooting.
 
Are you implying a conspiracy. I would think it would be pretty clear if to FBI if they tampered with the body.

I'm implying that you are denying facts in order to create this version of yours, and also that you should never take the attackers' version at face value when it places the full blame on the attacked.
 
Wait, seriously? This is confirmed by a representative of Brown and Johnson? So all this back and forth over "well, anyone could be a tall black male with a white shirt, red hat, shorts, and sandals" has been for naught?

That is so annoying because it's just a distraction from the main point, namely: YOU DON'T SHOOT PEOPLE WHO ARE RUNNING AWAY FROM YOU! Even if they are a suspect.

Seriously.

And I agree. I even stated as much a few pages back.

We need to get on the same page and stop quibbling over whether it's him or not.
 
Wait, seriously? This is confirmed by a representative of Brown and Johnson? So all this back and forth over "well, anyone could be a tall black male with a white shirt, red hat, shorts, and sandals" has been for naught?

That is so annoying because it's just a distraction from the main point, namely: YOU DON'T SHOOT PEOPLE WHO ARE RUNNING AWAY FROM YOU! Even if they are a suspect.

But what do you do? According to the reports Brown stole and then from what the video screenshots show, assaulted the clerk trying to confront him. Then he attacked a police officer and went for his gun and a shot went off inside the cop car and then he ran away. I mean what would most officers do in this scenario with no back up? Chase him down? I mean I really don't know.
 
But what do you do? According to the reports Brown stole and then from what the video screenshots show, assaulted the clerk trying to confront him. Then he attacked a police officer and went for his gun and a shot went off inside the cop car and then he ran away. I mean what would most officers do in this scenario with no back up? Chase him down? I mean I really don't know.
Witness says he didn't attack the police officer.
The cop grabbed him.

Also he surrendered after being shot at. The cop proceeded to keep shooting while he had his hands up.

Most people would chase them down. For gods sake he has a car. Then either tackle him or taser him.

Isn't this what fucking cops are trained to do? They shouldn't be killing people.
 
But what do you do? According to the reports Brown stole and then from what the video screenshots show, assaulted the clerk trying to confront him. Then he attacked a police officer and went for his gun and a shot went off inside the cop car and then he ran away. I mean what would most officers do in this scenario with no back up? Chase him down? I mean I really don't know.

We don't know any of this.
 
But what do you do? According to the reports Brown stole and then from what the video screenshots show, assaulted the clerk trying to confront him. Then he attacked a police officer and went for his gun and a shot went off inside the cop car and then he ran away. I mean what would most officers do in this scenario with no back up? Chase him down? I mean I really don't know.

Yes? Didn't matter anyway since we have multiple accounts that Brown was trying to surrender. That's even ASSUMING he actively went for the Cops gun which still wouldn't excuse the multiple follow up shots.
 
Are you implying a conspiracy. I would think it would be pretty clear if to FBI if they tampered with the body.

Pretty much. It's not like the police can hide some bullet wounds.

I don't know why there are so many people who want to jump into crazy conspiracy territory here. There's plenty of valid issues to be upset about. Saying that every piece of news has been calculated in a dastardly plan or that internet interruptions are all the work of the police is just making reasonable criticism of police procedures and the response look suspect by association.
 
There's your problem right there.

Hell, If I wanted to kill myself I'd just go to Stormfront.



Didn't know that, thanks.

not that im vouching for Stormfront -- but, it always just seems to lean back towards the jewish controlled media some how, in regards to seeing negativity thrown towards blacks/other minorities. They are generally well spoken. Sure theres a ton of slurs that I had no idea that existed about my fellow black folks, but its often not as infuriating to read as comments or that Policeone web forum. They seem like the Playboy for racism.

Not that i don't get upset at antisemitism, but its just interesting to see how they concoct a path to blaming them, its almost like they walk over the minorities to get to the real pay off.

This is a weird post, writing it.. but.. well.
 
I'm implying that you are denying facts in order to create this version of yours, and also that you should never take the attackers' version at face value when it places the full blame on the attacked.

What facts am I denying? I'm not saying I believe the police, just that this new information gives new context to the situation that makes the police story more plausible. If it turns out the officer shot him in the back from 20ft away. Then there is no excuse. Hopefully alot will be cleared up by the autopsy.
 
But what do you do? According to the reports Brown stole and then from what the video screenshots show, assaulted the clerk trying to confront him. Then he attacked a police officer and went for his gun and a shot went off inside the cop car and then he ran away. I mean what would most officers do in this scenario with no back up? Chase him down? I mean I really don't know.

"According to reports" from the cops.

Witnesses said he was trying to break free not going for the gun.
 
Witness says he didn't attack the police officer.
The cop grabbed him.

Most people would chase them down. For gods sake he has a car. Then either tackle him or taser him.

Isn't this what fucking cops are trained to do?

What gets me is that there has been statements, even one made by the chief today, that the officer was treated for injuries after the altercation.

Now, considering you shot someone dead, wouldn't you immediately want photos taken of your face for proof? Why weren't those released?
 
But what do you do? According to the reports Brown stole and then from what the video screenshots show, assaulted the clerk trying to confront him. Then he attacked a police officer and went for his gun and a shot went off inside the cop car and then he ran away. I mean what would most officers do in this scenario with no back up? Chase him down? I mean I really don't know.

The problem is that this question seems more reasonable on its face than it is in practice. There are a variety of non-lethal options at the officer's disposal including pursuit in the vehicle, pursuit on foot, verbal warning, a warning shot, and so on. But officers in this country resort to the most restrictive means of apprehension far too quickly and far too often.
 
BvGKx9NIQAAREnL.jpg

BvGKx-vIEAASsH8.jpg

Wesley Lowery ‏@WesleyLowery 7m
INBOX: Statement from Ben Crump, attorney for Brown family pic.twitter.com/ezci6cD0dl

.
 
Wow, this would almost be funny if it weren't so sad. I guess this is a small town so maybe things are different but at what point does a shoplifter become a robbery suspect? Is that even something that the PD put out an APB for in most places?

This is the exact same pattern that happen in the Trayvon Martin case. Find something bad the victim did and use it to justify their murder. With Trayvon they said he'd gotten suspended from school and smoked weed and now with Mike Brown he (allegedly) shoplifted and then pushed away a clerk trying to stop him. We can add these to the list of crimes that are punishable by death in this country, if you're of a certain shade of course.

Let this be a reminder to all black men; make sure that you have a squeaky clean record and never so much as said a bad word to anyone before getting gunned down in the street... Of course even then someone will play devil's advocate and come up with a justification for your death.
 
even if Brown did steal, even if Brown resisted arrested and ran... he did get wounded from on gun shot wound that forced him to stop running and the give up.

After he stopped and gave up, he got shot with more shots. That is the problem.

Is Brown guilty of robbery, probably.
Is Brown guilty of resisting arrest, probably.

But that does not condone the extra shots fired at him after he was wounded and gave up.

Those extra shots, that is the biggest problem. The excessive force used after the assailant was wounded.
 
Wow, this would almost be funny if it weren't so sad. I guess this is a small town so maybe things are different but at what point does a shoplifter become a robbery suspect? Is that even something that the PD but out an APB for in most places?

This is the exact same pattern that happen in the Trayvon Martin case. Find something bad the victim did and use it to justify their murder. With Trayvon they said he'd gotten suspended from school and smoked weed and now with Mike Brown he (allegedly) shoplifted and then pushed away a clerk trying to stop him. We can add these to the list of crimes that are punishable by death in this country, if you're of a certain shade of course.

Let this be a reminder to all black men; make sure that you have a squeaky clean record and never so much as said a bad word to anyone before getting gunned down in the street... Of course even then someone will play devil's advocate and come up with a justification for your death.

Worst part about this one is that it involves a badge. So if this officer doesn't get tried to the fullest extent of the law, all your doing is setting a new precedent for police to follow suit on what happened here.

This is bigger than Trayvon's case IMO.
 
even if Brown did steal, even if Brown resisted arrested and ran... he did get wounded from on gun shot wound that forced him to stop running and the give up.

After he stopped and gave up, he got shot with more shots. That is the problem.

Is Brown guilty of robbery, probably.
Is Brown guilty of resisting arrest, probably.

But that does not condone the extra shots fired at him after he was wounded and gave up.

Those extra shots, that is the biggest problem. The excessive force used after the assailant was wounded.

What information do we have regarding the number of wounds?
 
I definitely think it looks like him in the pictures, even has on the flip flop shoes his friend described. Many people who see the store pics will think its cut and dry, but I have seen some really strange altercations at convenience stores. I have seen a clerk come out from behind protective glass and pepper spray someone that was arguing with him, affecting everyone in the store. I still don't get why they'd tell him to get off the street if they thought he was a robbery suspect or shoot someone with their hands up.
 

How is the timing "devious". If they had released it earlier, they would have been criticized for releasing information without careful consideration of whether it was really related to this case. Do people think this stuff should be hidden from the public?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom