"The initial contact with mr brown and the officer was unrelated to the robbery."
Has this video been posted? Not sure if I need a warning, but strong language is used.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfy5FiqzWHI&sns=em
This would appear to be a third witness, aside from the already known Dorian Johnson and Tiffany Mitchell. I found it through Antonio French's twitter feed (he is the alderman in Ferguson that was arrested). Someone in the comments does give a name (Jack Larson), but they may be talking about who posted the video or something else, not clear. These comments are really sickening and not informative so I don't have the hear to go through them all. I haven't seen this video anywhere else.
I know this is a few pages back and maybe this is not something I should do (I'm trying to play catch-up and this thread exploded after the last time I was here), but I really want people to read what you said, because it's so important.
The poor innocent child who was killed had just stolen a box of cigars from a convenience store. SHOCKING.
The poor innocent child who was killed had just stolen a box of cigars from a convenience store. SHOCKING.
"The initial contact with mr brown and the officer was unrelated to the robbery."
"Initial contact between the Officer and Mr. Brown was not related to the robbery"
States that the officer who shot Brown was not the officer initially called for the robbery, and that their meeting was unrelated.
So the Chief is stating that Dorian Johnson will not be charged, and that they do not believe he was involved in the robbery at the store.
States that the officer who shot Brown was not the officer initially called for the robbery, and that their meeting was unrelated.
I thought the Chief said this morning that the description came out, and that the Officer who shot him was responding to the robbery? Unless I'm mistaken.
"Initial contact between the Officer and Mr. Brown was not related to the robbery"
The poor innocent child who was killed had just stolen a box of cigars from a convenience store. SHOCKING.
"The initial contact with mr brown and the officer was unrelated to the robbery."
Fair enoughI used the words allegedly because it is an incidence report. Also, Brown's never going to have his day in court because Darren Wilson took that away from him along with his life. So I used alleged, it is because he's not have been convicted of anything yet and never will be.
There were some defenses though. I merely pointed out defending the robbery is just as bad as using it for justification. That's beyond fair to say, no?Nobody is defending it, people are saying that bringing up is a smokescreen for justification of the shooting. I'm not trying to make Michael Brown into a saint here, but trying to focus only on the convenience store robbery is an implication that that Brown's own actions led to his death.
That is the issue I have with your posts. You're trying to force people to focus on something that is tangentially related to the issue that an officer shot Brown multiple times.
At least own up to that.
The poor innocent child who was killed had just stolen a box of cigars from a convenience store. SHOCKING.
What the fuck?
"The initial contact with mr brown and the officer was unrelated to the robbery."
"Initial contact between the Officer and Mr. Brown was not related to the robbery"
So pretty much confirms this is a smear campaign
Obviously him stealing a pack of cigarillos from a store justifies his execution style.
Go play in traffic; it'd be the smartest thing you've done all day.
The poor innocent child who was killed had just stolen a box of cigars from a convenience store. SHOCKING.
So what the police are saying is that he deserved die because he stole something? What is the point of the video? It doesn't show anything that involves the shooting of an unarmed citizen by a police officer.
Man, this whole thing is just fucked up. All this is doing is creating more confusion. Now he's being grilled for basically flooding the media with their accusations of Brown, and now basically diverting that by stating that the officer who shot Brown had nothing to do with the robbery.
So again, the point of releasing the video is....? Seems to be to dehumanize the victim.
Arguably it sets up a reason for the cop to stop him, and a motive for Brown to be hostile towards the cop. It's the first steps toward building a case of self-defense.
Initial contact between Brown and the officer wasn't related to the robbery - Police Chief
Back to square one.
Has this video been posted? Not sure if I need a warning, but strong language is used.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfy5FiqzWHI&sns=em
This would appear to be a third witness, aside from the already known Dorian Johnson and Tiffany Mitchell. I found it through Antonio French's twitter feed (he is the alderman in Ferguson that was arrested). Someone in the comments does give a name (Jack Larson), but they may be talking about who posted the video or something else, not clear. These comments are really sickening and not informative so I don't have the hear to go through them all. I haven't seen this video anywhere else.
"He is a gentle, quiet officer."
Well, apparently the "press asked for it"...So again, the point of releasing the video is....? Seems to be to dehumanize the victim.
Great fucking question. Props to that reporter.
So why the FUCK did they even release that detail anyway?
Can I get an abridged version as to all that's happened. This thread is 160 pages long
"Initial contact between the Officer and Mr. Brown was not related to the robbery"
So pretty much confirms this is a smear campaign
So why the FUCK did they even release that detail anyway?
The police chief looks nervous as hell. He is fucking up.